reblog: africa at its best
One of the most telling passages in that interview is when she singles out the Maasai and Somali as her favorite natives; not, for example, the Gikuyu who she had most contact with (because they did all the labor on her farm), but the natives who could be described using “noble savage” tropes and analogies to “Red Indians.” The laboring natives she prefers not to think too much about; the ones that exercise her imagination with their beautiful nobility are the ones.
[…]
Someone like Dinesen, in other words, is likely to regard the natives on whose labor she’s dependent differently than how she regards the people on whose land she’s dependent. One of the things that’s complicated about colonial Kenya was that while the Maasai were categorically displaced from their land and romanticized as “the Cherokee of East Africa” — precisely because they could be imagined as being utterly unwilling to be assimilated (and therefore safely and happily doomed to tragic extinction) — the Gikuyu were a laboring population on which the white settlers were parasitically dependent. To analogize to the American context — as the founders of the Kenyan settler state explicitly did — the Maasai were like the Plains Indians (who were imagined to sort of magically disappear as soon white people rolled up), while the Gikuyu were more like the way African-Americans looked to post-civil war white Americans: good to have around for working on plantations, but kind of creepy when they started wearing suits, getting educated, and getting anywhere near “our women.”
People like Dinesen loved the Masai; if you imagine them as a doomed pastoralist people who are intrinsically unable to adapt to modernity, then you don’t need to feel bad about taking their land. It’s just Darwin and stuff, right? They’re just too different than you and I. Pity they’ll have to go, but that’s the Law Of Nature. But while the Maasai supposedly had no desire to modernize, the Gikuyu were quite keen to take up education, progress, modernity, and all that stuff, which bugged the shit out of people like Dinesen and had to be suppressed and forgotten. […] Read More
via zunguzungu
Filed under: Africa, Scholarship and insights, Website | Closed
- If you're a scholar, and you find some of your work featured on the blog, then chances are that we want it for our journal.
-
what’s new
- The assumptions of settler colonialism need Mickey Mouse numbers: Joseph Francis, ‘How to Win a Nobel Prize Using Mickey Mouse Numbers: We Need to Talk about Acemoglu, Johnson, and Robinson’, The Poor Rich World, 27/05/26
- Placemaking in the Indigenous new place: Kevin Pierce Wright, An Archaeological Study of Choctaw Placemaking in Nineteenth-Century Indian Territory, PhD dissertation, University of Oklahoma, 2026
- The problem and its resistance: Zahi Zalloua, To Exist as a Problem: Being Black, Being Palestinian, Bloomsbury, 2026
- Colonisation, financialisation, violence: Hannah Forsyth, ‘Settler capitalism: new histories of colonisation, financialisation and violence’, Settler Colonial Studies, 2026
- Family therapy and settler colonialism: Olga Smoliak, Carmen Knudson-Martin, ‘The Enduring Logics of Settler Colonialism in Family Therapy: A Case Analysis of Sociocultural Attunement’, Family Process, 2026
- Settler colonialism and genocide: Jacob Blau, Legal frameworks, intent, and the reality of its victims: examining process of genocide in Palestine through settler-colonialism, MA dissertation, Northeastern University, 2026
- The exogeneity of Indigeneity: Olivia C. Harrison, ‘Éric Zemmour and the Ambiguities of Indigeneity Available to Purchase’, boundary 2, 53, 2, 2026, pp. 67-93
- Reconciliation must ‘truly benefit Indigenous peoples’: Niiyokamigaabaw Deondre Smiles, ‘”We’re Going to Reconciliation the Shit Out of You”: Canadian Liberal Settler Violence and the Possibilities for True Reconciliation’, in Marcos S. Scauso (ed.), Indomitable Others and Liberal Violences: Critique, Contestation, and Resistance in World Politics, Bristol University Press, 2026, pp. 101-118
- Settler technification: Sulagna Basu, ‘Settler militarism and technification: the case of the Navajo Code Talkers’, Australian Journal of Political Science, 2026
- Eugenics and the settler crisis: Heidi Nicholls, ‘Settler Sociology: Eugenic Responses to Imperial Crises in the 20th Century’, Sociology Lens, 2026
- Genocide and settler colonial violence: Jon Douglas Solomon, ‘Genocide, Settler Colonialism, and Imperial Causality’, in Jon Douglas Solomon, Foucault and Genocide: International Political Theory, Palgrave, 2026
- Settlement is sovereignty: Hüseyin Sevinç, Mert Mahir Göz, ‘Settlement Policies and the Sovereignty Regime in Palestine: Demographic Engineering, Settler Colonialism, and Spatial Politics’, Journal of Humanity, Peace and Justice, 3, 1, 2026, pp. 57-78
- The settler’s house: Marisa da Silva Martins, ‘Writing Back to the Canon: The Birchbark House as Counter-Narrative to Little House on the Prairie’, Via Panoramica, 14, 1, 2025
- Russian settler colonialism today: Rusana Novikova, ‘”The land needs a master”: agrarian ideals and settler realities in the Russian Far East’, The Journal of Peasant Studies, 2026
- Political settler colonial theory: David Myer Temin, Morgan Mowatt, Max Ajl, Phil Henderson, ‘Settler colonialism and political theory’, Contemporary Political Theory, 25, 2026, #38
contribute
