Abstract: This dissertation examines the political, rhetorical, and affective dimensions of wildfire governance in the western United States through three interrelated studies that together constitute a critical account of what I call “apparatuses of fire”: the discursive, institutional, and logistical structures immanent to the material existence of landscape fire which have shaped relationships to landscape fire in the U.S. over the past century. Chapter One analyzes the visual rhetoric of the Smokey Bear fire prevention campaign, the longest-running public service advertising campaign in U.S. history, as a site where human-animal difference is systematically constructed and naturalized. Drawing on Heidegger’s distinction between human “world-forming” and animal “captivation,” the chapter argues that Smokey Bear posters position fire prevention not merely as a civic duty but as an ontological imperative grounded in the exclusive agential capacity of humans over captivated nonhuman animals. Through close visual analysis of nonhuman animals in Smokey Bear posters, the chapter traces how representations of animality evolve in response to shifting environmental policy while consistently maintaining the foundational structure of human exceptionalism that underwrites the campaign’s central message: “Only You Can Prevent Forest Fires” because non-human animals cannot. Chapter Two offers a political-theoretical account of modern state fire governance as a biophysical state of exception constituted through the inclusive-exclusion of what I call “proscribed fire.” Adapting Giorgio Agamben’s theory of exception (1998) to the domain of environmental governance, and combining it with Paul Virilio’s (2006) dromological analysis of speed and logistics, the chapter argues that the U.S. Forest Service has governed fire-prone landscapes since the Great Fires of 1910 by simultaneously including fire as an exogenous limit-figure and deploying ever-greater logistical speeds to maintain territorial control. This framework illuminates both the fire exclusion era (1910–1970) and the subsequent turn toward ecosystem-based management as continuous expressions of settler continuance (Whyte, 2018) rather than genuine paradigm shifts. The chapter concludes by examining the emergence of AI-driven fire surveillance and autonomous management technologies as the latest iteration of a dromocratic logic that threatens to further marginalize Indigenous and community-based approaches to fire stewardship. Chapter Three turns from state institutions to ordinary people as decision-makers, drawing on twenty-three long-form narrative interviews with rural Inland Northwest residents personally affected by wildfire. Drawing on Lazarus’s principle (2016) of “people think,” the chapter argues that the emotions rural residents feel in response to wildfire — frustration, compassion, and gratitude — are not merely affective reactions to adverse circumstances but autonomous forms of pyropolitical thought capable of exposing, and operating beyond, the structural limits of normative governance and its forms of knowledge. Taken together, the three chapters advance a critical pyropolitics attentive to the ontological assumptions, logistical imperatives, and affective dimensions of U.S. wildfire governance, and call for alternative relationships to fire grounded in ecological reciprocity, Indigenous sovereignty, and genuine community autonomy.


Abstract: In this chapter, we examine how the Israeli military’s deployment of artificial intelligence (AI) systems—most notably the Lavender targeting program—operates as a contemporary extension of settler-colonial power that intentionally produces and conceals mass disablement. Situating these technologies within frameworks of racial capitalism, militarism, and ableism, we argue that algorithmic “precision-targeting” not only effectuates widespread impairment but also naturalizes this violence through the rhetoric of objectivity. Drawing on critical disability studies, crip theory, and settler-colonial critique, our analysis unfolds in three parts. First, we historicize the continuum from rubber-bullet maiming during the Great March of Return to AI-driven decision-support systems, showing how algorithmic thresholds of “tolerable error” encode political choices about whose bodies may be maimed rather than killed. Second, we unpack the epistemic logics of AI models; datasets, predictive heuristics, and minimal human oversight, to reveal how Palestinian lives are rendered killable and maimable data points. Third, we extend our critique globally, linking Palestine’s experience to analogous AI-enabled surveillance and debilitation in other regions. By foregrounding Palestinian disabled experience as a generative site for theorizing the co-constitution of disability, colonialism, and technology, this chapter contributes to peripheral crip critique and disability justice scholarship. We conclude by calling for a radical crip politics and transnational solidarity that rejects techno-colonial violence and reclaims AI futures centered on care, interdependence, and collective liberation.





Abstract: Beginning in 1831, the United States began to forcibly remove over 12,000 Choctaws from their homelands in the Southeast into Indian Territory. Despite the existing scholarship documenting the history of Indian Removal and the steps the Choctaw Nation took to form a new society, several broad questions exist within the Tribal community about the experiences Choctaws encountered during the initial decades of Removal. By examining the amptoba (pottery) from 19th-century homesteads in Oklahoma, this project examines the roles and ways in which Choctaw migrants used foodways to contend with the pressures of migration and settler colonialism. This project uses a mixed-methods approach to highlight migrant experiences and the relationships that families maintained with ancestral traditions. The results of archival, chemical, and morphological analysis reveal that while many families were prohibited from bringing cooking and serving wares with them along the Trail of Tears, many of these traditions were reconstructed in Indian Territory and used to form new relations. Furthermore, a comparison of archaeological contexts in which these objects were distributed in Mississippi and Oklahoma reveals that Indigenous placemaking efforts in Indian Territory relied heavily on the knowledge and actions of Choctaw women. Finally, this project argues that working in collaboration with descendant communities can lead to a more holistic anthropology and the production of knowledge that benefits living peoples.







top posts today

Archives

stats for wordpress