Abstract: Indigenous communities have long identified settler colonialism as foundational in conditioning health and wellbeing, and its role as a structuring force is increasingly recognized within population health. Yet analytic frameworks in the health sciences have limitations in representing its causal dynamics, with dominant epidemiologic approaches relying on causal assumptions—linearity, discrete exposures, and stable pathways—that are misaligned with its theorized properties as a dynamic, transtemporal, and adaptive social process. To investigate settler colonialism, we argue for epistemic fit across three interdependent layers: teleological clarity regarding the purposes orienting inquiry and the competing social visions at stake, including commitments to relationality rather than domination; ontological precision in mapping settler colonialism’s functions to their context-specific manifestations; and methodological approaches capable of representing feedback, emergence, conditioning, and historical dependence. Drawing on theory construction methodology, we develop a provisional framework for the settler colonial determination of health. Within this framework, settler colonialism is conceptualized not as a discrete determinant among others, but as a conditioning and transtemporal social formation that shapes institutions, processes of racialization and gendered power, and ultimately health outcomes. We outline implications for empirical research, highlighting configurational, dynamic, and systems-oriented approaches as strategies for representing settler colonialism’s multi-causal and adaptive impacts on health. By extending existing population health frameworks, this approach provides a foundation for developing empirically tractable models that more adequately represent settler colonialism’s relational, historical, and adaptive dynamics. Advancing such approaches is essential for generating explanations—and ultimately interventions—commensurate with health inequities in settler colonial contexts.


Abstract: The South African National Gallery in Cape Town, South Africa, was founded and functioned as a British colonial institution, designed to encourage cultural imperialism within the Cape Colony. It was forced to shift this founding focus as British influence in South Africa waned and the nation defined its own identity. This dissertation examines SANG’s proximity to the British settler colonial project and investigates how this proximity reveals the limitations of the latter in South Africa, from 1871 to 1961. It relies on records from SANG’s colonial archive, the National Library of South Africa and the Iziko Art Collections Library in Cape Town, as well as from the Tate Gallery, City of Westminster Archives and the National Archives, Kew in London. In reading archival sources through the framework of Anne Stoler’s “reading along and against the grain,” what is shown is how the gallery’s reliance on British visual culture and British arts institutions created tensions which mirror those in British settler colonialism. This dissertation is situated within the intersection of colonial museology, South African-British colonial history, and South African art history. It analyzes SANG’s founding and its imbrication with colonial land dispossession. It investigates the materiality and impact of gifts made by British industrialists including Alfred Beit and Alfred de Pass. It reveals the gallery’s shifting relationship with the Empire Art Loan Collections Society and the Tate Gallery. It examines SANG’s engagement with indigenous African art and its constructions of the “primitive,” supported by John Paris and Irma Stern. The artifice, fragility and hypocrisy of the British settler colonial project reverberating through South African constructions of white supremacy and nation-building is revealed. This dissertation reframes museums including SANG and their colonial archives as institutions which reveal the particulars of the construction and vulnerabilities of systems of colonization and white supremacy.









Archives

stats for wordpress