Excerpt: Sidney Xu Lu’s Collaborative Settler Colonialism: Japanese Migration to Brazil in the Age of Empires (University of California Press, 2025) makes a significant contribution to settler colonial studies by expanding the cast and by making settler colonialism to be of connections and collaborations, oftentimes fragile, imperfect, and contested. In Lu’s analysis we get to read of settler colonialism that is multilateral, produced through cooperation among multiple imperial and national actors. This book shows how networks matter, how Japanese on the move became settlers not through direct Japanese territorial conquest, but through collaboration between the Brazilian state, Japanese imperial institutions, private companies, and global racial-capitalist logics. Thus Lu moves beyond the Anglo-phone emphasis of settler colonial histories while showing that settlers did not have to originate from the same imperial power that governed the territory, but how settler colonialism could be enacted through trans-imperial cooperation. In this Book Forum we asked scholars whose expertise blended Japanese, Asian, and Latin America, ranging from literature to local and global histories of diasporas and imperial mobilities to take a look and voice their views on Lu’s book. They were to raise what they perceived as important points in the book, to evaluate its premise, execution, and contribution. As a result, we have a lively set of views and arguments, multiplicity of voices, but also coherence and praise on the value and significance of Lu’s study. Pedro Iacobelli raises the question of colonial ownership by emphasizing how Lu unsettles linear narratives of Japanese history in Brazil, locating them instead within a dense web of inter-state collaboration, intersecting Japanese and Brazilian settler-colonial projects, and enduring ties between Japanese emigrants and Japan’s own settler ambitions. From a literary and methodological standpoint, Shannon Welch highlights how Lu provides a strikingly effective framework for tracing the interactive and overlapping workings of settler colonial power in the modern world. Building on this, John Hennessey underscores Lu’s careful reconstruction of the personal, institutional, and ideological linkages connecting Japanese settler colonialism in Asia to emigration to Brazil, demonstrating with rich empirical detail just how contingent and internally fractured Japanese settler positions were. Mariko Iijima similarly stresses that Lu repositions Japanese settler experiences within expansive global regimes of colonial expansion, land seizure, and racial governance, reframing them as integral – rather than peripheral – to the history of settler colonialism writ large. The Book Forum ends with Sidney Xu Lu’s self-reflective response, in which he elaborates on his views on the book’s purpose, the commentaries, and the broader connotations involved. This marks the third Settler Colonial Studies Book Forum, which we plan to continue as a sustained feature of the journal. The Forum aims to spotlight timely, innovative, and consequential new work in the field, and to place it in generous yet rigorous conversation with a diverse group of experts, in dialogue with the author. As with the previous iterations, we believe this Forum succeeds in bringing cutting-edge settler colonial scholarship into focused, energetic discussion.



Excerpt: A new interdisciplinary field, which I am calling “Oaxacan studies,” has emerged and is offering important conceptual tools for thinking about Latinidad in local, transborder, and hemispheric contexts. While most of the Anglophone scholarship on Oaxaca has been produced by historians and anthropologists who are not native to the pueblos they write about, a generation of scholars that is Indigenous to Oaxaca’s pueblos is now writing about Oaxaca from the vantage point of migrants and children of migrants who were forced to grow up in diaspora. While these scholars have been trained in various disciplines, their work builds on the community-engaged scholarship produced by scholars such as Michael Kearney, one of the leading anthropologists in this field, who is credited with coining the term “Oaxacalifornia” (Kearney, 1995), the transborder political, cultural, and economic space where Indigenous Oaxacans live. When Kearney passed away in 2009, I was a new member of the Indigenous Binational Front (FIOB), a primarily Oaxacan transborder organization, and was asked to take three scholars (Devra Weber, Lynn Stephen, and Laura Velasco) from Los Angeles to Kearney’s house in Riverside County. Once there, we joined his family, FIOB activists, friends, and colleagues to mourn his passing. Those attending recounted how they had met him, the things he had done for Oaxacan migrants, and then we all sang “Canción Mixteca,” a song that expresses the deep sadness and longing of being away from one’s homeland. At the time, I was unaware of Kearney’s contributions to the field of anthropology and the study of transnationalism, but the regard that the Oaxacan paisanos had for him and the stories they shared of when he helped them in their organizing efforts taught me about the importance of establishing long and committed relationships with the community. In a recent publication, Leisy Ábrego (2024) noted that scholars who center the experiences and well-being of the people they conduct research with “aim to be in accompaniment,” meaning that there is an ethical and political responsibility to those people who serve as research subjects. While each individual Oaxacan scholar has their own relationship with their pueblo of origin and the communities they conduct research with, at the core of Oaxacan studies is this ethic of accompaniment that is anchored in the various social organizations created by the Indigenous Oaxacan community: hometown associations, cultural organizations, religious organizations, student organizations, autonomous political organizations, and nonprofit organizations. Building on Kearney’s legacy, this new generation of Oaxacan scholars is shaping the future of Latinx studies by offering not only new conceptual tools for thinking about Indigeneity within a larger conversation about Latinx heterogeneity but also providing a model of accompaniment that is responsive to the individuals they conduct research with, their pueblos, and their descendants, both here and there.




Abstract: This dissertation examines the history of a small colonization reserve to ask how prairie land becomes known and accepted primarily as settler agricultural space even if vaguely understood, at some level, as Indigenous land. The land in question – designated for Mennonite migrants to Manitoba from Imperial Russia in 1875 and often referred to as the ‘West Reserve’ – was one of two block settlements provided to Mennonites in the 1870s. In this micro-historical context, I focus on the interactions between settler history-making, land, and geography, to explore the relationships between material and discursive forms of Indigenous land dispossession, and to consider the roles of water and landscape in the formation of settler identity. As West Reserve settlers became more established, they began to historicize and commemorate their presence there, establishing a corpus of historical understandings of this place that grew stronger and more solidified into the late twentieth century. In many ways this body of knowledge established parameters that defined the region as Mennonite, agricultural, settler space. Yet an analysis of state, settler, archival, and oral history sources reveals that this discursive unmaking of Indigenous space was never totalizing, nor were narratives of agricultural ascendancy the only stories of the region’s environment and geography. Indigenous Peoples continued to utilize, live in, and travel through the region throughout the timeframe of this study (roughly from the time of Mennonite arrival well into the twentieth century). Though the reserve was noted for not having any major water bodies within it, its many small creeks and low areas remained intrinsic, if less-emphasized, features of both the environment and people’s experiences of it.








top posts today

Archives

stats for wordpress