Abstract: Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are deeply connected to the lands, seas and skies across the settler-colonial state of Australia. They take strength from ongoing connection to culture, spirituality and community. Colonisation impacts these life-giving connections through the dispossession of peoples from Country and disconnection from community and culture. These ongoing colonial processes negatively impact Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people’s access to quality housing and are the source of housing precarity. Housing research often portrays Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people’s housing experiences within deficit discourse. Deficit discourse causes harm in its problematisation of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people who are reduced to characterisations such as ‘the Indigenous housing problem’. Strengths-based discourse, now regularly applied in health, can address this harm by centring Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people’s cultures, knowledges and priorities, and appropriately contextualising experiences within settler colonialism. Aboriginal health researchers have for two decades pushed for strengths-based discourse, leading to shifts in health policy, such as the call to eradicate systemic racism. There is an opportunity to similarly flip the script in housing research to centre Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people’s existing strengths, capabilities and community-led housing solutions and positively influence housing policy.




Abstract: Major actors within the United Nations and academia have suggested that the Svalbard Global Seed Vault (SGSV), a ‘backup’ facility for the world’s crop diversity, could facilitate reconciliation between Indigenous and ex situ conservation approaches. This paper examines the collaboration between the SGSV and their Indigenous depositor, Parque de la Papa (Parque), to assess this proposition. Although the SGSV promises to ‘secure’ crop diversity ‘for the benefit of everyone’, work in decolonial and Indigenous studies has shown that neoliberal capitalist and colonial structures underpin and hinder reconciliation and conservation efforts. By critically analyzing literature from various fields and content from institutional websites, I demonstrate how the SGSV’s methods, while intended to safeguard crop diversity, may inadvertently perpetuate colonial dynamics by integrating Indigenous seeds into a system that prioritizes Western/settler colonial, neoliberal capitalist values. Reading the two conservation approaches vis-à-vis, I highlight the asymmetrical exchange that the Parque must navigate to preserve Indigenous knowledge and resources amid climate change challenges in the Andean highlands. Based on the analysis, I assert that despite the collaboration’s benefits, it risks transforming Indigenous communities along Western lines, potentially undermining biodiversity. Understanding these challenges is crucial for improving biodiversity protection and supporting the communities involved.


Abstract: This doctoral thesis interrogates the colonial and juridical foundations of Israel through a new conceptual framework: the inceptional state of exception-a condition of permanent emergency inscribed at the very origin of Zionist settler-colonial sovereignty. Rather than viewing Israel as a democracy in decay or degeneration, the study reframes it as a state constituted through the routinisation of legalised violence, racialised exclusion, and bureaucratic domination. In this account, the state of emergency is not an aberration but the baseline structure of legal and political order-embedded from the outset and sustained through the colonial logic of exception. The analysis proceeds through critical engagements with Hannah Arendt, Edward Said, and Giorgio Agamben, reread through the prism of Palestine. From Arendt’s account of imperialism and bureaucracy, the thesis develops the concept of subaltarianism: a mode of domination that governs silently through legal-administrative routine, embedding violence in ordinary governance. From Said’s confrontation with Orientalism and exile, it advances the claim of dehumanisation as the founding logic of empire, tracing how Palestinians are produced as illegible, expendable, and structurally unknowable-and how narration emerges as a form of resistance against erasure. At its conceptual keystone, the thesis builds on and extends Agamben’s framework, elaborating Israel as a paradigmatic state of inceptional exception: a wholly unprecedented formation where emergency is foundational to sovereignty. In its culminating gesture, the study turns to Dante Alighieri’s The Divine Comedy, neither peripherally nor incidentally, but as the poetic horizon in which these conceptual trajectories converge. Dante’s poetics of exile and redemption provide the necessary counterpoint to juridical foreclosure, reframing the waste land as a site of resistance and renewal. By bridging settler-colonial studies, Palestine studies, political theory, socio-legal analysis, and the historiography of empire, this dissertation forges an integrated frame that makes visible what each field alone cannot: how juridical suspension, bureaucratic domination, and erasure form the structural core of colonial sovereignty. This interdisciplinary intervention reframes sovereignty, law, personhood, and hope through the colonial crucible-pressing beyond description toward conceptual innovation, confronting the evasions of canonical theory, and generating the conceptual resources necessary to name Israel’s singular condition.








Archives

stats for wordpress