Abstract: This thesis examines how “return” operates as a grammar of moral formation in the digital TradWife movement. Across Instagram, TikTok, conferences, influencer accounts, and land-based communities, calls to return to tradition, femininity, the home, God, the body, and the land organize a moral world in which recently assembled practices come to feel inherited, coherent, and true. This thesis asks how performances that often appear hypocritical, nostalgic, or overly staged become persuasive, how audiences participate in sustaining them, and how their affective appeal becomes tied to broader projects of gender hierarchy, Christian nationalism, racial belonging, and settler attachment to land. Methodologically, the thesis draws on digital ethnography, close reading, platform analysis, and performance theory. Its archive includes TradWife and homesteading content collected from Instagram and TikTok between 2024 and 2026; the online persona and comment sections of Christ With Cali; the platformed gender discourse of Savanna Faith Stone; Turning Point USA’s 2025 Young Women’s Leadership Summit; and Return To The Land, a white identitarian settlement project in Arkansas. The analysis brings these materials into conversation with scholarship on religion and media, affect, ethical formation, invented tradition, professional wrestling, Christian nationalism, settler colonialism, and Indigenous sovereignty. The thesis argues that return becomes powerful through repetition, participation, and scale. In digital TradWife media, tradition is staged through kayfabe: a performed reality sustained by creators, audiences, critics, and platforms. Viewers may believe, expose, mock, defend, or parody the performance, and each form of engagement helps keep the world of return available. As these scenes circulate, fabricated heritage becomes a lived orientation. Practices such as modest dress, submission, raw milk consumption, fertility preparation, sourdough baking, and domestic labor come to function as signs of ethical alignment. Under platform conditions, this process becomes algorithmic traditionalism: the circulation of traditionalist signs through affective intensity, ambiguity, ragebait, and engagement-driven visibility. The argument culminates in the claim that digital TradWife domesticity translates larger political and theological imaginaries into intimate form. Blood names lineage, fertility, and reproductive futurity; soil names stewardship, sacred inheritance, and land made morally available; sourdough names the repetitive domestic labor through which continuity is maintained and passed forward. In the case of Return To The Land, the grammar of return becomes territorial, organizing ancestry, membership, education, reproduction, and settlement into a project of white ecological belonging. Placed alongside Indigenous accounts of return, revitalization, refusal, and sacred land protection, this settler return appears politically uneven. Return can authorize possession and sustain obligation. It can make longing feel like belonging while also binding people to responsibilities already present in land, ceremony, sovereignty, and ancestors. Ultimately, this thesis shows that return functions as a formative grammar within digital TradWife culture. Through return, subjects learn how to feel, desire, inhabit, and defend a world that appears old precisely because it is being continually remade.


Abstract: This article investigates how contemporary documentary films construct political, visual, and narrative understandings of the Israeli settler project, which is an ongoing settler-colonial project that is sustained by territorial expansion, displacement, and the structural domination of Palestinians. While scholarship has examined settler colonialism in Palestine/Israel, less attention has been given to how contemporary documentaries narrate and visualize this evolving project. The research question is: how do the documentaries No Other Land (2024) and The Settlers (2025) narrate and visualize the expansion of the Israeli settler project, and what do they reveal about the broader political, ideological, and colonial structures that sustain and normalize settlement expansions? Analyzing No Other Land (2024) and The Settlers (2025), the study analyzes how first-person, collaborative, and long-form documentary practices challenge dominant narratives, expose settler violence, and highlight human security concerns such as personal, economic, and community insecurity. Analysis of No Other Land, directed by Basel Adra, Yuval Abraham, Hamdan Ballal, and Rachel Szor, showed that the film visualizes settler colonialism as an ongoing structure rather than an isolated event. Scenes of home demolitions, filmed with handheld cameras, created emotion and gave the film a sense of authenticity. The documentary foregrounds Palestinian sumud (steadfastness) through the portrayals of families who refuse to leave their homes, while exposing the collaboration between Israeli settlers and soldiers during attacks on Palestinian homes. In contrast, The Settlers, directed by Louis Theroux, interrogates the ideological and political forces driving settlement expansion in the Occupied Palestinian Territories (OPT). The study concludes that contemporary documentaries serve as powerful tools of political critique and public understanding of the Israeli settler project. Together, they demonstrate how documentary film can shed light on the mechanism of settler colonialism, challenge dominant Israeli and Western framing of this conflict, and contribute to broader debates on occupation, settler violence and resistance.




Description: A devastating, meticulous account of the history of Israel’s destruction of Gaza from an acclaimed architect and investigator. Eyal Weizman is one of the world’s leading experts on the relationship between violence, conflict and the environment, both built and natural. As director of the organisation Forensic Architecture, he and his team of interdisciplinary researchers document acts of state crimes and human rights violations around the world. Since 2023, the group has worked to produce evidence for the International Court of Justice’s genocide case against Israel. In this revelatory new project, Weizman draws on that research to bring us on an eye-opening journey across time and into the ‘deep cartography’ of the area extending from Gaza’s subterranean tunnels through to its militarised topography, its unique soil, settlements and barriers. He catalogues, in unflinching and forensic detail, the Israeli campaigns of violence and displacement that have reshaped the region in an effort to make Gaza and its surrounding areas unliveable. Taking us through the broader geographic and historical context, from the Nakba in 1948 to the present day, Ungrounding establishes that architectural and territorial analysis is key to understanding the relationship between coloniser and colonised – and how Israel’s actions after 7 October escalated into violence so extreme and so far-reaching as to, Weizman argues, meet the definition of genocide. Deeply informative and profoundly affecting in its scope and precision, and illustrated with dozens of original images, maps and diagrams, Ungrounding is an essential document of atrocity in our time.








top posts today

Archives

stats for wordpress