Description: How the rhetoric of monogamy was weaponized against Indigenous and queer lives by colonial powers in the nineteenth century. While marital monogamy is often posited as inevitable and essential, it was in fact a negotiated practice inflicted onto occupied lands to enforce social control and white settler reproduction. Conjugal States makes an ambitious and far-reaching investigation of how colonizers used monogamy to symbolize modernity, weaponized against Indigenous communities in South Africa, New Zealand, and British Columbia—and how this process was complicated by the emergence of the Mormon Church. In Conjugal States, T.J. Tallie reveals how the queer destabilizing potential of Mormon polygamy in the nineteenth century clashed with the broader aims of colonization, resulting in legal action against plural marriages and fears of Mormon “contamination” in other settler spaces. As colonial powers attempted to delineate and justify their occupation, monogamous marriage became a key method of performative civilization. By analyzing the fraught debates concerning gender, marriage, belonging, and race that arose between British settlers, Christian missionaries, South Asian migrants, and Indigenous peoples in contested territories around the world, Tallie reveals how marital practices and prohibitions shaped the contours of colonial life. A deeply archival work, Conjugal States illuminates how both monogamous marriage and colonial power were predicated on the precarity of their own control. Tallie tells the story of the enormous repercussions of this global phenomenon, providing a history of sexuality, settler colonialism, and Indigenous peoples that charts varied forms of native resistance to settler incursions.




Abstract: This investigation examines how settler colonialism obscures Indigeneity behind the settler Indian caricature. Making Indigenous presence visible, legible, and accessible within the settler colonial landscape of South Florida when attributed within settler colonial Indian representations around tourism. To analyse how settler colonial structures create these Indian representations, this thesis explores the ancestral land of the Seminole and Miccosukee peoples. In this, the field of study does not analyse Indigenous representations but rather settler Indian representations. To perform this, I draw on settler colonial theory, decolonial thought, and Indigenous scholarship. This introspection allows the research to situate and understand colonialism as an enduring structure that continues to organise space, memory, and visual culture in the present. While also being grounded in a decolonial methodological orientation, the thesis engages with urban and rural environments, tourist infrastructures, and public-facing cultural sites across South Florida to examine how representations are colonially manipulated. Through attention to visual, spatial, and textual forms, I examine and display how Indigenous representations circulate within everyday settler spaces, not as contemporaneous political subjects, but as aestheticised symbols that appear detached from land, history, and futurity. Thus, by situating South Florida as a site where spectacle and colonial power intersect, this research contributes to wider conversations in decolonial geography, visual culture, and Indigenous studies. Overall, this work highlights the need to reconsider the unfettered display and consumption of Indigenous representations. This remains central to the reproduction of the settler colonial order of assimilation and erasure. Thus, an active acknowledgement and engagement with the coloniality of representation is needed that frames Indigenous peoples within their own economic, social, and representational sovereignty.



Abstract: The British and the Aotearoa New Zealand governments in the mid-1880s proposed a trial colonisation of Scottish Hebridean crofter fishing families in the southernmost Otago province. These settlers were envisioned as more than mere labour; they were intended to develop a nascent export fishing industry while rehabilitating themselves from a perceived state of poverty and malaise. In doing so, the project sought to restore faith in the vaunted images of British and Scottish imperial ‘might’ that had come under unprecedented stress. Yet, the scheme imploded within a year without a single crofter settled. Using under-examined archival records, newspaper accounts, and parliamentary debates, this article brings this forgotten attempt at state-sponsored social engineering to light. It argues that the project’s fall was driven by growing doubts that the Hebrideans could indeed return themselves, Otago, and New Zealand to a reified past, or whether this was something the colony even desired. Both grew ascendant, causing the ‘Othering’ of the Hebrideans. This affords a broader investigation into how Scottishness, Britishness, and whiteness were not automatic entries to privilege, but conditional performances. The Hebrideans ‘muddied’ multiple binaries – settler-indigenous, Anglo-Saxon-Celt, Pākehā-Māori, traditional-modern, metropole-periphery, core-borderland – a confuson necessitating their exclusion, not just in 1885 New Zealand, but continuing into contemporary narratives surrounding settler colonialism, imperialism, nationalism, and identity formation.







Archives

stats for wordpress