Description: This book examines Nazi Germany’s expansion, population management and establishment of a racially stratified society within the Reichsgaue (Reich Districts) of Wartheland and Danzig-West Prussia in annexed Poland (1939-1945) through a colonial lens. The topic of the Holocaust has thus far dominated the scholarly debate on the relevance of colonialism for our understanding of the Nazi regime. However, as opposed to solely concentrating on violence to investigate whether the Holocaust can be located within wider colonial frameworks, Rachel O’Sullivan utilizes a broader approach by investigating other aspects, such as discourses and fantasies related to expansion, settlement, ‘civilising missions’ and Germanisation, which were also intrinsic to Nazi Germany’s rule in Poland. The resettlement of the ethnic Germans-individuals of German descent who lived in Eastern Europe until the outbreak of the Second World War-forms a main focal point for this study’s analysis and investigation of colonial comparisons. The ethnic German resettlement in the Reichsgaue laid the foundations for the establishment and enforcement of German society and culture, while simultaneously intensifying the efforts to control Poles and remove Jews. Through this case study, O’Sullivan explores Nazi Germany’s dual usage of inclusionary policies, which attempted to culturally and linguistically integrate ethnic Germans and certain Poles into German society, and the contrasting exclusionary policies, which sought to rid annexed Poland of ‘undesirable’ population groups through segregation, deportation and murder. The book compares these policies – and the tactics used to implement them – to colonial and settler colonial methods of assimilation, subjugation and violence.





Excerpt: Read together or alone, these three valuable contributions to nineteenth-century studies provide us with insights into how Victorian journalism in particular influenced imperial narratives and shaped public opinion on war, race, and empire. Settlers, War, and Empire in the PressUnsettling News in Australia and Britain, 1863–1901 examines Australian colonist conflicts in New Zealand (1863–64), the Sudan (1885), and South Africa (1899–1902) via their representation in newspapers. In his opening remarks Sam Hutchinson makes the claim that the ‘Anzac legend’, or ‘Anzac spirit’ (the set of courageous characteristics said to be demonstrated by Australian and New Zealanders during the First World War), as articulated by the newspaper press, can be pieced together from different elements in the reporting of each of the aforementioned conflicts. The Anzac spirit is, as such, one example of the main preoccupation of Hutchinson’s thesis: the formation of a settler character, forged out of the negotiation between representations of Australia as colony and an increasingly independent set of states, moving towards federation and commonwealth. This negotiation, as indicated by the title of Hutchinson’s book, emerges via close readings of the periodical press in Britain and Australia. Indeed, one of the key revelations of Settlers is the interpretative interplay — the dynamic, reciprocal relationship — between newspapers in Australia and Britain revealed by Hutchinson’s analysis. This analysis uncovers how the news reported in one location shaped the perspective and content of the news in the other.


Abstract: Indigenous-settler reconciliation in Australia and Canada seeks to reset relationships deeply harmed by generations of legal discrimination and cultural genocide. Prime ministerial apologies in both countries in 2008, alongside sustained Indigenous, civil society, and legal advocacy, appeared to reinvigorate reconciliation efforts. However, progress has since stalled. While existing research has examined various social and political factors shaping reconciliation, few studies have simultaneously examined the roles of societal narratives and individual attitudes. This thesis therefore asks: what are the societal-level and individuallevel barriers to Indigenous-settler reconciliation in Australia and Canada? To answer this question, the thesis presents five empirical studies using qualitative and quantitative methods within a comparative framework informed by settler colonial theory. The studies analyse the influence of history education, collective memory, media discourse, and public opinion on support for reconciliation. Across these domains, the findings demonstrate the recursive nature of societal narratives and individual attitudes toward reconciliation. The analysis identifies three societal-level barriers operating across contexts: the continued use of, or belief in, collective memories challenged by the 2008 apologies, settler paternalism, and deficit framing of Indigenous Peoples. These narratives are reproduced through formal education and media discourse, shaping public understandings of reconciliation and influencing individual-level support for reconciliation initiatives. Taken together, the findings provide a comparative, multi-level explanation of how societal narratives and individual attitudes interact recursively to sustain barriers to reconciliation in settler colonial societies. The thesis concludes by discussing the implications of these findings for advancing reconciliation and identifying avenues for future research.








top posts today

Archives

stats for wordpress