Abstract: This paper argues that North America’s emerging digital economies are materially and politically grounded in ongoing regimes of settler-colonial extraction. While scholarship on “digital colonialism” has illuminated new forms of data appropriation, corporate concentration, epistemic domination, and frontier discourse, it has often underemphasized the extent to which digital infrastructures remain tethered to fossil capitalism and Indigenous dispossession. We contend that digitization is not post-extractive. Rather, it amplifies extractive relations, relying on energy-intensive infrastructures powered by fossil fuels from Indigenous lands. Focusing on Calgary, a Prairie petropolis that has rebranded itself as a “smart city,” we examine how urban digital transformation is embedded in, and extends, settler-colonial fossil regimes. We develop four interrelated claims: (1) the appropriation of resources from Indigenous lands remains foundational to digital economies; (2) corporate power in both fossil and tech sectors is mutually reinforcing within the political order of the petro-state; (3) the digitization and automation of extraction reconfigure labor geographies, undermining Indigenous employment while distancing work from land-based lifeways; and (4) these dynamics intensify colonial violence, with profound consequences. By situating digital capitalism within the historical and ongoing logics of settler colonialism, the paper reframes debates on digital colonialism in grounded, place-based terms.


Abstract: For generations, prison population rates in colonial carceral systems have reported breathtakingly high levels of Indigenous incarceration. While Canada, Australia, Aotearoa New Zealand and the United States of America (CANZUS) are most often cited in this regard, Indigenous hyperincarceration manifests in colonial carceral jurisdictions across the globe. Positioning Indigenous incarceration as an integral part of a colonial project which is both lived and ongoing, this chapter scrutinises the imperialist logics driving historical and contemporary exercises of colonial carceral control over Indigenous nations. This chapter draws on two colonial carceral case studies: Kanaky (New Caledonia) and Australia. Building on the observations and reflections of those with lived experience of prisons in these jurisdictions, as well as on both critical scholarship and Indigenous advocacy work in Australia and Kanaky, this chapter examines the structural relations between colonisation and incarceration, and between decolonisation and decarceration. Analysing the ways colonialism and Indigenous incarceration are fundamentally entwined in these jurisdictions, this chapter demonstrates the purposeful and continued deployment of carceral control over Indigenous nations as a tool of the modern-day colonial project to subdue, subjugate, dispossess and eliminate Indigenous peoples. Drawing on illustrations from Kanaky and Australia, this chapter concludes that the inherently colonial nature of Indigenous incarceration necessitates the fundamental fracture of the contemporary structures of colonial invasion—including the prison. Only then can Indigenous decarceration become a reality.





Abstract: This paper explores the origins and early years of the Flying Doctors of Australia and what I call counter circuits or infrastructures of settler-colonial-evacuative mobilities—an important but overlooked modality of settler-colonial mobility and infrastructural development. While drawing an important distinction between the service today and its origins, I argue that the service’s early provision of medical care constituted not only a particular form of settler-colonialism but a particular infrastructural technique that made possible its pursuit. Circuits of evacuative mobility under the logics of supporting the settler-state promised the hope of both projection and an assurance of return—often supported by numerous affective and emotional constructions such as relief, consolation, and reassurance. The Flying Doctors evolved not just as a symptom of colonialism but as a supporting practice, driven by a colonial, administrative and cultural logic that has imagined Australia’s inland, and especially its north, as semi-vacant, natural, and problematic. The article is not intended to make any broader application to the services of the present-day, but to rather understand the incredible and difficult origins of the service. It considers what this might tell us about the emergence and evolution of settler-colonial extractive formations through aerial medical infrastructures and mobilities, and how “evacuative” logics of mobility may persist, and complicate and coincide with other more projective or reparative ones.







top posts today

Archives

stats for wordpress