Treaty, principled: Hemopereki Simon, ‘Are the Treaty Principles Needed in The Bay of Plenty?: A Critical Reexamination of the Fedarb (Bay of Plenty) Sheet of Te Tiriti o Waitangi’, International Indigenous Policy Journal, 15, 3, 2024 | settler colonial studies blog

Treaty, principled: Hemopereki Simon, ‘Are the Treaty Principles Needed in The Bay of Plenty?: A Critical Reexamination of the Fedarb (Bay of Plenty) Sheet of Te Tiriti o Waitangi’, International Indigenous Policy Journal, 15, 3, 2024

05Feb25

Abstract: This study explores the nature of the Fedarb sheet of the Treaty of Waitangi. The author argues that it conflicts with the conventional argument for the necessity of Treaty principles. She argues that the Treaty principles are a device of settler/invader colonialism. The study is a type of Kaupapa Māori writing inquiry. In the case of the Fedarb sheet, if there was no English treaty sheet provided, then most traditional Treaty scholarship arguments become invalid.Rather than interpret Te Tiriti in light of the English Treaty, we must recognize that all the Fedarb signatories provided to the government was the ability to regulate land-use.Mataatua waka should not have been made a part of the settler colonial construction that was the results of settlers’ inaccurate interpretations of the document..All this highlights the need to view the various sheets of The Treaty of Waitangi and/or Te Tiriti o Waitangi as not a single monolithic and homogenous document, but differentiated international treaties between sovereign hapū and the Crown of England. Each sheet should be seen as separate and different on a regional and whakapapa basis, in its own context.

Filed under: Uncategorized | Closed