Excerpt: Indigenous historians engage with and understand resilience through both an interdisciplinary lens and specific community attitudes toward the concept. Scholars of developmental psychology, psychiatry, social work, and education have drawn on resilience to analyze how Indigenous peoples have dealt with the trauma of colonialism, especially settler colonialism, while maintaining distinct beliefs, practices, and identities. Moving beyond the “bounce back” understanding of the concept, Native social work researcher Hilary Weaver defines resilience as “an ability to resist, persevere, survive, and grow despite significant challenges” and broadens those expressing resilience to include communities and the natural world. She and others posit that resilience is central to being Indigenous; Stephanie Rotarangi and Darryn Russell, for example, connect it explicitly to indigeneity, arguing that “to be indigenous is to be resilient.” These scholars and practitioners showcase resilience to illustrate that there is more to Indigenous peoples than damage and trauma even as they acknowledge that the catastrophic consequences of colonialism and capitalism on Native nations, communities, and environments. Much of their scholarship highlights how Indigenous identities, beliefs, and practices continue and are expressed, reclaimed, and transformed today. They argue that Indigenous expressions of resilience often connect past, present, and future. For example, some point to ways that ancestors who first encountered colonial expansion planned for the continuity of their peoples; additionally, they urge Native peoples today to carry forward ancestral responsibilities for subsequent generations. Drawing on the idea of intergenerational trauma or Historical Trauma Theory as proposed by Maria Yellow Horse Brave Heart, others explore how the trauma of ancestors remains relevant for Indigenous peoples today. Countering developmental psychology’s tendency to pathologize the individual through resilience analysis, these scholars shift the focus of trauma onto the structures and systems responsible for causing the damage, i.e., colonialism and capitalism.






Abstract: Indigenous people in settler colonies such as Australia, the United States, and Canada are currently engaged in a range of projects to revitalize their languages: to reclaim and restore them in the wake of colonial destruction. Such language revitalization is frequently met with fierce backlash. This article examines the relationship between language revitalization backlash and genocide. I argue that language revitalization is part of broader efforts by Indigenous people to reconstitute themselves as distinct groups in reaction to colonial genocides. Backlash against language revitalization can therefore be seen as one element of ongoing efforts to prevent this, leading to a set of social and political relations I call perpetual genocide. I explore the dynamics of language revitalization backlash and perpetual genocide through an analysis of more than 600 social media comments collected from Australia over 2022 and 2023—the opening years of the International Decade of Indigenous Languages—and identify three key themes in these comments: civilizational racism, English and white supremacy, and linguistic diversity as a threat. Based on this analysis, I argue that this backlash, and the perpetual genocide of Indigenous peoples more broadly, is driven by a structural arrangement I call reactionary settler colonialism, which is led by a right-wing vanguard but involves all settlers as implicated subjects. I conclude by discussing counter-genocidal praxis in relation to this formation.