Abstract: Although attention to continuing and continuous structural elements of settler colonialism remains central to understanding the harms inflicted on Indigenous communities, there is always a risk that overfocusing on ‘a structure, not an event’ can leave little air for Indigenous actions and dynamism amid colonial systems of elimination and appropriation. Settler colonialism is not a monolith but a set of overlapping structures. Even with broad shared goals of appropriation, settlers have seldom agreed on the means or extent of elimination to be used in pursuit of those goals. In the late 1800s American Pacific Northwest (and elsewhere), Euro-Americans unwilling to face the extent of the genocidal violence their community used to seize land sometimes attempted to isolate the atrocities they could not ignore to a few fringe actors – turning them into what I call ‘settler colonial sin-eaters,’ and thus absolving the broader settler society of crimes in which nearly all were complicit. But in a context where many other Euro-Americans wanted their acts of genocide foregrounded and celebrated, some Indigenous people used these disavowals as a wedge to push against ongoing physical genocide and continued land theft. Disavowal of genocide is dangerous, but avowal of genocide is even more so.


Abstract: When the Society of Jesus returned to Turtle Island in the 1840s after the suppression of their order in 1773, searching for and consolidating the records they had been forced to leave behind was of utmost importance. The first Jesuit archivists set out to copy legal documents from Jesuits in Europe, records of their travels, and of correspondence between Jesuits in France, to build a coherent narrative of their order that foregrounded a sense of continuity with their forebears. The consolidation of these records led to the creation of the Collection des archives du Collège Sainte-Marie (CACSM). This article puts forward a case study that explores the description of records in the CACSM catalogue and the persistence and normalization of the catalogue descriptions into its later forms such as the index and internal database. It builds on recent scholarly examination of cataloguing systems and archival descriptions that have defined these as systems of knowledge, infrastructures of power, and tools of colonialism. We begin by arguing that the descriptive indicators of both original records and copies emphasized land as a means to assert Jesuit presence and influence, revealing the profound connection between the archive and settler colonialism. Then, we show that these descriptions were crucial actors that mobilized knowledge production by naming, framing or erasing information to meet the settler-colonial worldview. Finally, we demonstrate that the persistence of these catalogue descriptions, through the creation of other indexes and finding aids in the 1950s and beyond, signify their structural impact and functions.