Excerpt: Cowboy takes up the entirety of this small museum and is divided into three sections, each on a full floor: on the main floor, “Mythmaking” prompts us to reflect on the cowboy as myth; on the second floor, “From Fantasy to Lived Experience” shifts the focus from the myth of the cowboy to the cowboy as worker and rodeo performer; and in the basement, “Reimagining the Past, Present, and Future” presents artists speculating on the futures made possible through creative engagement with the cowboy and its associated histories. By foregrounding the cowboy as a site of myth and meaning-making—for example, through the placement of “Mythmaking” on the main floor—the curators suggest that the primary problem plaguing the cowboy imaginary is its narrow scope, which makes particular representations more prominent than others. The exhibit expands or opens up these narrow/short-sighted/stereotypical perceptions by offering more authentic representations of the cowboy. Yet its design and organization—which emphasizes the cowboy as a multifaceted and multicultural figure—has the simultaneous effect of downplaying the historical and material conditions of settler colonialism and imperialism that make the cowboy so ubiquitous. The exhibit thus exemplifies the disjunct between frameworks of multiculturalism and decolonization. However, if we consider the exhibit from the vantage point of Indigenous and settler colonial studies, it becomes clear that even if a variety of actors engage with the cowboy, they do so precisely because it is embedded in the US settler colonial project.





Abstract: In the Winter 2020, Canada witnessed an extraordinary number of blockades and solidarity
protests in support of the Wet’suwet’en First Nation. The Wet’suwet’en had for years been fighting
against the construction of an oil pipeline across their traditional territories. After a police raid
dismantled their blockade, the traditional chiefs of the Wet’suwet’en issued a call for solidarity and
support. The response was overwhelming with an enormous number of solidarity actions, including
blockades of critical infrastructure, organized across Canada and internationally. This paper
critically examines how settler-citizens engaged in acts of solidarity with Indigenous people, with a
particular focus on how these acts of solidarity can contribute to the decolonization of Canadian
citizenship. Since the Wet’suwet’en struggle involved the assertion of Indigenous sovereignty, the
solidarity actions of Canadians raise important questions about the meaning of settler forms of
citizenship. This paper takes a relational and decolonial perspective on solidarity blockades. Such an
approach allows us to ask questions that are outside the scope of assessments concerned with the
efficacy of a particular blockading action. The paper investigates the forms of solidarity found at the
blockades, noting that a wide range of antagonistic, agonistic, and spatio-temporal relations were
enacted at the various blockading actions. These relations allowed for a contentious production of
new political subjectivities, collectivities, and citizenships
.




Abstract: Frederick Jackson Turner, premier historian of the frontier and American exceptionalism, wondered late in his career how sectional identities had formed in the United States. Out of all the American sections, the Midwest seemed to have no distinct character, serving instead as a miniature model of the entire nation. Turner’s professional descendants in the Midwestern History Association have interrogated the region’s typicality, noting that it became in the twentieth century a generator of progressive reform movements and a new homeland for diverse groups. Looking back at the region’s eighteenth- and nineteenth-century past, particularly within the conceptual framework of Indiana University Press’s Trans-Appalachian Frontier series (1996–2018), lets historians determine when the Midwest separated from its parent region, the “old” West, which included the Deep South. The territories between the Appalachians and the Missouri River initially shared many features: a large and adaptive Native American population, a commitment among white settlers to commercial agriculture and land speculation, and attractiveness to utopian experimenters. The Midwest separated from this larger region after 1865, when formerly enslaved Black people moved to the midwestern states from the white-supremacist South, immigrants reshaped the social landscape of midwestern cities, and regional authors and artists began constructing a midwestern stereotype in order to critique and demystify it.



Description: A gripping account of the violence and turmoil that engulfed England’s fledgling colonies and the crucial role played by Native Americans in determining the future of North America. In 1675, eastern North America descended into chaos. Virginia exploded into civil war, as rebel colonists decried the corruption of planter oligarchs and massacred allied Indians. Maryland colonists, gripped by fears that Catholics were conspiring with enemy Indians, rose up against their rulers. Separatist movements and ethnic riots swept through New York and New Jersey. Dissidents in northern Carolina launched a revolution, proclaiming themselves independent of any authority but their own. English America teetered on the edge of anarchy. Though seemingly distinct, these conflicts were in fact connected through the Susquehannock Indians, a once-mighty nation reduced to a small remnant. Forced to scatter by colonial militia, Susquehannock bands called upon connections with Indigenous nations from the Great Lakes to the Deep South, mobilizing sources of power that colonists could barely perceive, much less understand. Although the Susquehannock nation seemed weak and divided, it exercised influence wildly disproportionate to its size, often tipping settler societies into chaos. Colonial anarchy was intertwined with Indigenous power. Piecing together Susquehannock strategies from a wide range of archival documents and material evidence, Matthew Kruer shows how one people’s struggle for survival and renewal changed the shape of eastern North America. Susquehannock actions rocked the foundations of the fledging English territories, forcing colonial societies and governments to respond. Time of Anarchy recasts our understanding of the late seventeenth century and places Indigenous power at the heart of the story.