Access the special issue here.


Abstract: This article explores the involvement of the Australian railways in the forcible removal of Aboriginal children. Focusing on the visions and voices of Aboriginal peoples who were taken away from their families by train, the article considers how railways were used in the attempted assimilation of First Nations peoples into White society. The last train ride, an artwork by South Australian Yankunytjatjara artist and Stolen Generations survivor Kunyi McInerney, serves as a point of departure to study how the settler colonial infrastructure of rail operationalised the Australian government policies of assimilation. I ask how railway infrastructures have affected Aboriginal peoples and how Aboriginal peoples have responded to railway infrastructures. In centring the artworks and narratives of Aboriginal people taken away by train, I extend an invitation to readers to rethink geography through the visual expressions and stories of First Nations peoples. Close attention to the perspectives of affected peoples opens possibilities to view infrastructures in a different light. The visions and voices of Aboriginal families impacted by assimilation policies show that the railways played a pivotal role in the separation of Aboriginal children from families and that railway infrastructures have also been sites of resistance to and subversion of assimilation and child removal. Paying careful attention to First Nations voices and visions, the article informs how the Australian railways have been complicit in assimilation policies and how Aboriginal peoples have used the railways to resist and survive such settler colonial projects.


Excerpt: Access to land and property ownership has been racialized since the inception of the US settler colonial state, with the relocation, resettlement, and genocide of Indigenous peoples through the dispossession of their traditional homelands serving as a key origin point. Today, Alaska Natives are facing a similar process, having lost around 80% of their traditional lands to colonization via the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act of 1971, and losing more land each day with upwards of 70 of their 200 communities facing imminent threats from the colonially created climate crisis. With climate change and the associated increase in frequency and intensity of natural hazards putting millions of people at risk around the world, especially Indigenous Peoples, the cycle of dispossession and forced relocation could start all over again if the US government fails to address the colonial past and present. Yet, despite increasing climate impacts globally, no single set of policies or strategies exists to determine if or when communities can no longer be protected in-place in the face of climate impacts. So, while the federal government has a duty to assist Alaska Native communities in proactive, preventive community relocation in the face of rising sea levels and eroding coastlines, the current legal and funding structures have thus far limited federal and state response to piecemeal, reactive projects, and left ANVs with little recourse to address climate change. However, investing in Indigenous land return, often referred to as “Land Back,” could provide a way forward. Land Back, rematriation, or land return—defined sometimes as the return of Indigenous lands to Indigenous hands—is a process that “addresses the root of colonization—the theft of Indigenous lands (including their destruction through resource extraction), the violence committed against Indigenous peoples to build capitalism across the country, and the effects that [Indigenous] communities still experience today”. As an Indigenous-led movement and a decolonial set of actions, the structure and strategy of Land Back are built with the tacit understanding that existing systems are what is causing climate change, not what will solve the climate crisis. Looking to a tool such as Land Back to address the urgent needs of Alaska Native communities, and recognizing the difficulty faced by these communities in accessing their rights in existing legal and policy frameworks, it is essential to reassess existing (and inadequate) disaster recovery and climate adaptation systems. Recent legal research on the duty of the federal government—via the Federal Trust Doctrine and international Indigenous human rights law—combined with the social pressure for reparations and climate justice, could create an environment that is ripe for systemic change, which could leave the door open for the beginning of Indigenous land return and just climate adaptation via existing but underused legal tools.




Abstract: The ‘white replacement’ (sometimes called ‘white genocide’) conspiracy theory has become a key element of contemporary far-right racist ideology. The white supremacist terrorist who committed mass murder at two Christchurch mosques in March 2019 brought his Islamophobia with him from Australia to New Zealand. His online ‘manifesto’, posted just prior to the massacre, was entitled The Great Replacement, and began with the sentence, ‘It’s the birth rates’ repeated three times. Both Australia and New Zealand are former British white-settler colonies where whiteness remains hegemonic. Both have small Muslim minorities, but have a history of everyday Islamophobia since 9/11, including violence directed against Muslims and their places of worship. Much of this violence has been directed against Muslim women, often more ‘visible’ because of the hijab, itself targeted in Islamophobic ideology as a supposed manifestation of Muslim misogyny and backwardness. Islamophobic vilification has also been explicitly directed at Muslim women, whose dangerous fecundity is portrayed (with wild misrepresentation of demographic reality) as threatening to overwhelm the predominant white, Western national culture. The racist far right calls ritually for drastic counter-measures, with ‘ethnic cleansing’ ranging from violent racist metaphors to actual terrorist murders. In the current global circulation of Islamophobic propaganda, the local articulation of the ‘replacement’ myth in Australia integrates elements of anti-Muslim racism from Eastern Europe and white-supremacist ideology from North America (from Charlottesville 2017 to the Capitol siege in 2021), always in complex intersection with gender relations.