Abstract: Feral, pest, savage, invaders: cats have long been painted as the villains in Australian histories, continuing to wreak havoc on biodiversity and the welfare of prized ‘native’ species. But where do these ideas come from? Could it be that selective ecological narratives have presented a simplistic account of feline pasts and presents, obfuscating the complex human–animal–environment entanglements that actually exist? This chapter critically explores human–cat relations in Australia, drawing a multidisciplinary approach to explore themes of anthroparchy, dis/utility, settler colonialism, and extinction. Existing narratives from scientific, popular cultural, and governance discourses will be analysed using a social constructivist lens, with key themes brought to life in feline-centric vignettes to demonstrate alternative constructions of cats as minded, emotional, oppressed, and capable of coexistence with humans and other animals. This unique methodological approach effectively foregrounds non-human animals in the narratives that often cause them to become invisible them, offering a rich and multifaceted contribution to the representation of non-human animals. This multidisciplinary method allows us to imagine a future where cats have been freed from the narratives which trap and cast them as villains, and present socio-scientifically supported possibilities through which this might be achieved.


Abstract: This article offers a critical Indigenous analysis of the Te Awa Tupua (Whanganui River Claims Settlement) Act 2017, celebrated as an innovative fusion of Māori cosmology and Western law through the legal personhood of the river. While positioned as a hallmark of bicultural partnership, the Act exemplifies bicultural containment – a state strategy that symbolically includes Māori worldviews while preserving the juridical supremacy of the settler state. Drawing on Aileen Moreton-Robinson’s theory of the white possessive, Unger and Henderson’s contextuality, and critiques of biculturalism as a ‘zombie’ concept, the paper shows how Te Awa Tupua functions as a ‘settler move to innocence’, reframing whakapapamana and kaitiakitanga within government regimes. Rather than advancing mana motuhake, the settlement embeds Māori relational ontologies into governance structures accountable to ″the Crown″. Legal personhood, while symbolically powerful, is constrained by co-governance mechanisms, racial capitalism and biopolitical control, ensuring sovereignty over ‘resources’ remains with the state. Situating Te Awa Tupua within the trajectory of Crown–Māori relations, the article argues that biculturalism has shifted from responding to Māori demands for justice to regulating them within narrow confines. Genuine decolonisation requires the return of land, water and decision-making authority grounded in tikanga and Indigenous governance, not symbolic recognition.





Abstract: Social science scholarship has long explored the spatial, political and embodied dimensions of contamination, attending to the ways pollutants are unevenly distributed and unreliably contained. In this framing, waste is relegated elsewhere, to people and places deemed expendable. However, while exposures to waste and other forms of contamination remain deeply uneven, we are also witnessing a shift into a new era in which toxic exposures are increasingly inescapable for everybody on this planet. In this paper we ask: If waste is a relation that relies on othering, what happens when it begins to overflow its neat containment, seeping into spaces previously protected by wealth and privilege? We situate this enquiry in the context of recent pollutant events in settler-colonial Australia, examining three case studies that emerged across 2024 and 2025: 1) “Tar balls” comprised of faeces, drugs, and oil; 2) cases of melioidosis caused by a bacteria referred to as the “mud bug”, and 3) PFAS, so called “forever chemicals”. Though differing in form and scale, each of these contamination events emerges in or through water, and travels across bodies, ecologies, and infrastructures. Drawing from approaches in critical discourse analysis (CDA), environmental humanities, toxic geographies, and feminist science and technology studies (STS), we analyse media reporting on these particular pollutant events as representative of our shifting relationship to toxicity in a chemically saturated world. We argue for a hydrological approach, informed by hydrosocial scholarship, that thinks with water’s relational qualities to challenge the settler-colonial logics of purity and containment that underpin contemporary understandings of toxicity, pollution, and waste. The emergence of contaminants in the privileged spaces of Australia’s waterways may signal the breakdown of containment logics but also an opening: a chance to reconfigure our relationship to toxicity and toxic living.