Abstract: The Australian settler government has repeatedly promised indigenous peoples (Anangu) of Uluru-Kata Tjuta National Park that they will benefit from settler government’s use of their lands as a significant tourism destination, yet the anangu community of Uluru remains one of the poorest communities in Australia. this article utilises historical analysis and qualitative interviews with Anangu, Parks staff, and tourism staff to chart key dynamics in the relationship between the tourism industry and anangu over 39 years of Joint Management in the Park. We show how the prioritisation of settler logics of tourism and work over Anangu benefit is not just an arbitrary cultural decision meted out in day-to-day interpersonal relations but is built into the geographies and temporalities of work in the Park. highlighting how anangu benefit is deferred through settler logics of work draws attention to the possibility for alternatives that are founded on indigenous lifeworlds. this article’s analytic focus on quotidian, relational dynamics in intercultural contexts brings insights from indigenous and settler colonial studies into tourism research and demonstrates a new way of identifying opportunities for transformation in indigenous tourism industries in settler colonies. From a practical perspective, these insights underscore the importance of developing shared understandings of what meaningful and good “work” is in intercultural industries and highlights possible interventions into entrenched dynamics between indigenous and settler peoples in these contexts.



Abstract: Since the 1980s, Western academia began to thoroughly contend with anticolonialism and environmentalism, progressively connecting the two movements. At their crossroads, I make four major contributions as a Palestinian activist-scholar. Firstly, I theorize settler colonialism as an operation that is inherently genocidal, outlining ways in which it destroys human and nonhuman lives in my homeland. Secondly, I designate the absorption of environmentalism by Israel for expansionist purposes as “green colonialism.” I provide several examples of this manoeuvre, perceiving it to be a Western environmental, Orientalist, and Zionist concoction. They include Israeli construction of forests as border walls, rezoning of Palestinian localities as “protected areas,” recruitment of settlers into hiking and planting as exercises of Indigenization, and rendering of Palestinians as ecological enemies. Thirdly, I animate the stories of several demolished Palestinian localities, which have been smothered by the Zionist entity, sourcing them from oral archives. Fourthly, Indigenous rebellion in human and nonhuman forms is spotlighted. I also channel Palestinian, scientific, anticolonial, and Islamic knowledge to foster “holistic decolonization.” This notion prioritizes human rights, while attending to the abolition of White supremacy, capitalism, patriarchy, and anthropocentrism. The introduction of this dissertation is split into two parts: the first examines the four major foundations of green colonialism in Palestine, (Zionism, Orientalism, settler colonialism, and Western environmentalism), while the second expounds my contributions to literature on the topic. The first chapter of this thesis sketches out the colonial architecture of the Israeli park system, the second chapter largely consists of a case study, (which investigates the imposition of USA Independence Park over the remnants of 8 Jerusalemite villages by Israel), and the third chapter provides a glimpse into the paradoxical fusion of Zionist environmentalism and militarism. This dissertation closes with a summary and points to global openings for Indigenous healing, restoration, and return.





Abstract: This article offers a critical reassessment of francophone education in Canada through postcolonial and settler colonial theory. Francophone communities have long framed themselves as colonized minorities resisting linguistic and cultural assimilation. However, this identity often obscures their simultaneous participation in settler colonial structures, particularly regarding Indigenous lands and histories. Adopting a comparative, critical narrative methodology, the article analyzes curriculum frameworks from multiple Canadian provinces, historical documents such as the Parent Commission (1963–1966), and key texts on decolonization and Indigenous–settler relations. Literary and philosophical perspectives complement this analysis by exploring the affective and ethical dimensions of truth-telling in education. Findings reveal that while francophone education emphasizes cultural survival, it often marginalizes Indigenous perspectives or includes them in superficial ways. Curricula across Canada show persistent tensions between gestures of inclusion and deeper structural silences. Institutional and employment precarity among francophone teachers further complicates the adoption of critical pedagogies, especially when they challenge dominant national narratives. The article proposes a pedagogical ethics of truth built around three dimensions: epistemic accountability, affective engagement, and transformative praxis. It calls for curricula co-created with Indigenous partners, validation of emotional responses to injustice, and learning practices grounded in dialogue and land based inquiry. Ultimately, the article challenges the limits of multicultural inclusion and the myth of francophone innocence. Truth telling in education, it argues, must move beyond symbolic gestures to become a foundational commitment—one that embraces discomfort and reimagines historical responsibility as an ongoing and relational process.



Abstract: Growing demand from the British timber market led loggers to push deep into Algonquin territory in the first half of the nineteenth century, and tens of thousands of agricultural settlers followed suit. While the Algonquin faced unrelenting pressures from the timber industry and agricultural settlement, colonial governments representing the Crown failed to negotiate the acquisition of Indigenous land as required under the Royal Proclamation of 1763. Using expanded timber ship immigration data from 1817 to 1839, as well as agricultural census manuscripts, we reappraise how timber extractivism operated in conjunction with settler colonialism to dispossess the Algonquin in the Ottawa Valley. Our case study, which focuses on Westmeath Township, demonstrates the interconnected processes that prioritized and enabled thousands of settlers to transform remote, unceded land into a neo-European landscape, effectively “un-making” Algonquin space in a short period of time. Settlers followed the timber roads up the Ottawa Valley beyond the Rocher Fendu Rapids in the 1830s and 1840s, drawn in part by the high prices paid by timber camps for oats and hay. Farmers extended the ecological transformation of the regions begun by the loggers, clearing forests to establish permanent farms above the rapids. Timber extractivism and settler colonialism fed one into the other as the logging camps provided labour opportunities and a market for animal feed, timber ships provided cheap passage, and settlers provided food and labour.