Abstract: The topic of this academic review is settler slogans that mandate colonial school policy in North America. Also discussed is Indigenous futurity as a strategy for transforming education and countering the educational harm that comes from weaponized language. Beginning in 1887, the US federal government authorized colonial schooling, using the dangerous educational cliché “Kill the Indian in him, and save the man.” The purpose of this article was to illuminate this weaponizing rhetoric in education, which served as a guiding principle for imposing Indigenous assimilation that manifested as federal policy in the Americas. Research questions were, How did the kill-and-save slogan shape US and Canadian education and policy? How can the concept of Indigenous futurity improve Indigenous education? Colonial settler efforts to control tribal nations with weaponizing rhetoric leveled at education policy, public perception,and compulsory boarding/residential schools are exposed. Peer-reviewed studies were read, with analysis of 51 sources, many authored by Indigenous academics. Resultant cultural genocide, systemic discrimination, and educational disparity are described. Indigenous resistance to settler ideologies, policies, and settlements, as well as assertions of tribal rights, freedom, and sovereignty, reflect patterns in the material analyzed. Modern-day empowerment of society’s most vulnerable ethnic group requires a deep rethinking of schooling processes. Debunking settler futurity, the lesser-known Indigenous view of futurity looks to sustaining Indigenous communities and calls on society for amends.


Description: The German poet and mystic Novalis once identified philosophy as a form of homesickness. More than two centuries later, as modernity’s displacements continue to intensify, we feel Novalis’s homesickness more than ever. Yet nowhere has a longing for home flourished more than in contemporary environmental thinking, and particularly in eco-phenomenology. If only we can reestablish our sense of material enmeshment in nature, so the logic goes, we might reverse the degradation we humans have wrought—and in saving the earth we can once again dwell in the nearness of our own being. Unsettling Nature opens with a meditation on the trouble with such ecological homecoming narratives, which bear a close resemblance to narratives of settler colonial homemaking. Taylor Eggan demonstrates that the Heideggerian strain of eco-phenomenology—along with its well-trod categories of home, dwelling, and world—produces uncanny effects in settler colonial contexts. He reads instances of nature’s defamiliarization not merely as psychological phenomena but also as symptoms of the repressed consciousness of coloniality. The book at once critiques Heidegger’s phenomenology and brings it forward through chapters on Willa Cather, D. H. Lawrence, Olive Schreiner, Doris Lessing, and J. M. Coetzee. Suggesting that alienation may in fact be “natural” to the human condition and hence something worth embracing instead of repressing, Unsettling Nature concludes with a speculative proposal to transform eco-phenomenology into “exo-phenomenology”—an experiential mode that engages deeply with the alterity of others and with the self as its own Other.



Abstract: Despite today’s era of political and economic revitalization due in part to American Indian economic development, Oklahoma Choctaw people still contend with land dispossession facilitated by state and federal governments. Considered alongside the state of Oklahoma’s contentious relationship with tribal nations today, this dissertation examines how US settlers have utilized the collusive power of history and law to constitute settler sovereignty and facilitate Indigenous land dispossession. By ethnographically examining the legal life of settler historical production and how it continually reshapes the conditions for landownership among Choctaw people living in their post-removal homelands, it reveals how US and state laws – informed by anthropological and historical scholarship that proclaim the decline of Indigenous sovereignty and legitimate the settler regime of private property – have continually worked to dispossesses Choctaw people of their lands throughout time. Nevertheless, despite the relegation of Choctaw sovereignty to the past in scholarly publications and its minimization in the present by state actors, Choctaw people who maintain Choctaw ways of life consistently challenge such claims and efforts. Furthermore, the dissertation addresses the discrepancy between the massive, underutilized archival sources created by Oklahoma Choctaws and published scholarship. Consequently, it argues for the usage and development of tribal histories that are attentive to the work of settler colonialism and that draws upon overlooked and underutilized archival materials. By holding an ethnographic study of contemporary Choctaw economic development, a critical historiography of the Choctaws and Five Tribes, fieldwork on Choctaw archival materials and their repositories, and the wide breadth of tribal history informed by cultural knowledge within the same frame, the dissertation importantly highlights the interrelated relationship between the production of history, US law, and ongoing land dispossession in an era of resurgent American Indian political-economic power.


Access the chapter here.




Abstract: This thesis examines the relationship between lesbians, land, and settler colonialism through an analysis of several texts written about Antarctica by lesbians. In the introduction, this thesis identifies the three fields of study which it draws upon–rural queer studies, queer nature studies, and queer indigenous studies–and notes the absence of settler colonialism as a point of analysis in rural queer studies despite the field’s focus on the relationship between queer people and land. The following section, “Lesbians, Land, and Settler Homonationalism,” provides both historical background of lesbian land-based movements such as the landdykes and theoretical considerations important for the thesis, namely how non-Native queer people and identities often uphold settler colonialism. In the next chapter, “The Antarctica Question,” the thesis explores Antarctica’s colonial history and its current queer relationship to settler colonialism. This is followed by a discussion of three texts–Approaching Ice and Towards Antarctica by Elizabeth Bradfield and On the Ice by Gretchen Legler–which examines the ways these writers’ relationship with Antarctica resembles other lesbian land movements, their negotiations with settler colonialism and a masculine Antarctic explorer history, and the personal (queer) transformations enabled by lived experiences on land (or ice). The conclusion identifies how a settler colonial logic might lapse through a relationship with land and the transformations that such a relationship forges, but ultimately will heal over the lapse in its framework unless challenged directly.