Abstract: This Viewpoint considers the implications of incorporating two interdisciplinary and burgeoning fields of study, settler colonialism and racial capitalism, as prominent frameworks within academic global health. We describe these two modes of domination and their historical and ongoing roles in creating accumulated advantage for some groups and disadvantage for others, highlighting their relevance for decolonial health approaches. We argue that widespread epistemic and material injustice, long noted by marginalised communities, is more apparent and challengeable with the consistent application of these two frameworks. With examples from the USA, Brazil, and Zimbabwe, we describe the health effects of settler colonial erasure and racial capitalist exploitation, also revealing the rich legacies of resistance that highlight potential paths towards health equity. Because much of the global health knowledge production is constructed from unregenerate contexts of settler colonialism and racial capitalism and yet focused transnationally, we offer instead an approach of bidirectional decoloniality. Recognising the broader colonial world system at work, bidirectional decoloniality entails a truly global health community that confronts Global North settler colonialism and racial injustice as forcefully as the various colonialisms perpetrated in the Global South.




Abstract: Purpose –This article argues that truth recovery practices that take place against the backdrop of ongoing settler colonial erasure, as is the case when considering Zionist colonial violence in Palestine, must focus on combating state-sponsored attempts at erasure, rather than solely providing a platform for the expression of settler guilt. Design/methodology/approach – The article analyses existing literature on truth recovery practices that take place in Palestine, including the work of a variety of local NGOs engaged in such praxis, with a view to considering how this form of transitional justice has germinated incrementally in the space. Critical reflection on the work of a variety of grassroots NGOs is situated alongside other forms of transitional justice intervention. Findings – The article argues that in the context of enduring settler colonialism, the truth regarding past Zionist atrocities in historic Palestine must avoid being curated in the present day in such a way as to allow for damage limitation rather than the platforming of conversations around meaningful repair. Truth recovery for recovery’s sake serves only to reinforce the settler colonial status quo rather than properly agitate for a full decolonisation, one that demands and facilitates indigenous Palestinian return. Originality/value – The article challenges prevailing notions of the role of truth recovery practices in spaces of enduring settler colonial value. It makes clear that the role of truth recovery interventions in sites where colonial violence endures must be to actively and meaningfully support activities that reinforce native identity, history and presence on the land. Moreover, by reference to existing grassroots attempts at truth recovery in Palestine, the article provides an original and clear argument that states it is simply not enough to platform the revelation of uncomfortable truths or to provide opportunities for settler violence of the past to be “confessed” in public if it is disassociated from challenging the present-day structures of ongoing oppression. Keywords Palestine, Israel, Transitional justice, Truth recovery, Settler colonialism.



Abstract: SpaceX’s rocket launch site, Starbase, lies at the bottom tip of Texas on Boca Chica Beach, where the Rio Grande meets the Gulf of Mexico. With SpaceX maintaining a presence in the region since 2014, Starbase is seen as a bridge between Earth and Mars that will generate economic development in the area by SpaceX and government officials. In recent years, increased road closures, gentrification, and explosive rocket tests in proximity to Boca Chica beach, sacred Esto’k Gna sites, local wildlife refuges, the U.S.-Mexico Border, and the cities of Brownsville and Matamoros have been a cause of distress for environmental scientists, activists, the Carrizo-Comecrudo Tribe, and local residents. Brownsville, previously named the poorest city in the United States, sits twenty miles from Starbase with a ninety-four percent Hispanic/Latinx population of mixed citizenship status. Local residents who contend with the region’s militarization and history of racially motivated violence are now faced with the fast-moving aerospace engineering industry, space tourism, and Mars colonization. This study seeks to understand how SpaceX’s presence and activities are politically legitimized within South Texas and what they mean for Indigenous and Latinx residents. This will be done through interviews and Participatory Action Research (PAR) conducted in Brownsville with activists, Carrizo-Comecrudo tribal members, and local residents of Brownsville. Data from fieldwork will be compared with online media and accounts taken by the Federal Aviation Administration’s (FAA) Town Hall meetings in October 2021. This research identifies sites of discursive incommensurability that arise between modern scientific rhetoric and the Esto’k Gna, Mexican, and Tejano cosmologies that define the identity of the Lower Rio Grande Valley. In seeing how technoscientific enterprises make universalizing claims of modern science to appeal to liberal notions of technological progress, we can see how space ventures coordinate with neoliberal policies to colonize and dispossess lands here on Earth and in outer space. I argue that SpaceX colonizes the Lower Rio Grande Valley using the same strategies as those used by settlers of the Western frontier. Similar to how Texas public history and education curate an image of Texan mythologies, SpaceX propagates an image of Starbase online through aesthetic images of the technological sublime, devoid of any trace of local ethnic Mexican people and sanitized of any harm done to the area. Theorizing alongside my interlocutors, I illustrate how these conditions in turn create the phenomenon that I call Martian Borderlands, diffuse regions marked by entry-points between Earth and Mars that alienate land for the sake of rocket launches and effectively render local inhabitants alien in the process.


Access the article here.



Abstract: “Settler Colonial Fatherhood in New South Wales and Ontario During the Long Nineteenth Century” is a comparative study of Indigenous, white, and mixed-race fathers in the British Empire as they navigated, and in turn, shaped cultural ideas of fatherhood. Using child custody cases, popular medical guides, newspaper articles, correspondence, memoirs, and wills, this project analyzes men’s lived experiences against the backdrop of colonial institutions and imperial ideologies. Examining race, respectability, and reproduction, it uses fatherhood as an entry point into the broader theme of settler colonialism, including the formation of settler states and the reach of their authority. To interpret constructions of colonizer fatherhood, I examine legal and medical institutions. In addition, I analyze the effects of settler colonization on nonwhite fathers and the strategies they used to counter dispossession. In existing narratives of nineteenth-century colonial power relations, white male colonizers were at the top of the gendered, racialized hierarchy. They are assumed to have benefited from privileges withheld from non-white men and white women. In the arenas of medicine, law, and lives, I argue that settler colonialism put fathers under pressure. While the typical agents of colonial power—government officials, judges, missionaries, and medical professionals—make their appearance in this project, informal political actors also materialize. When confronted with families who blurred racial lines, white relatives and neighbors policed colonial boundaries. In addition, my dissertation argues that, in many instances, white men were unwilling or unable to meet normative fatherhood expectations. They placed pressure on settler colonial structures and justifications for rule.