Abstract: A key feature of the confluence of modern nation-state formation and colonization has been the marginalization and denigration of minoritized language varieties, particularly Indigenous languages, over time. Indigenous languages have been actively proscribed in public language domains, such as education, leading to their inevitable shift and loss, in settler-colonial contexts worldwide. This process of linguistic hierarchization has long been recognized in the sociology of language and the sociology of nationalism but the overt and covert linguistic racism attendant upon it had remained relatively underexplored. Recent discussions within sociolinguistics and linguistic anthropology, however, have addressed this lacuna, particularly through the development of raciolinguistics as a theoretical framework. Linguistic racism, a form of cultural racism, uses discursive constructions of language use and related linguistic hierarchies as a proxy for the racialized discrimination and subordination of Indigenous peoples and other minoritized ethnic groups. Here, I explore discourses of linguistic racism by Pakeha (White) New Zealanders in Aotearoa New Zealand toward te reo Maori, the Indigenous Maori language, in everyday discourses and the media. I focus particularly on the public contestation of the increasing normalization of te reo Maori in contemporary New Zealand society, the result of the successes of the last 40 years of Maori language revitalization, via both overt and covert forms of linguistic racism toward te reo Maori. These discourses act in defense of English monolingualism, the direct linguistic legacy of New Zealand’s settler-colonial history, along with the privileges this history has provided for White, monolingual English-speaking New Zealanders. Interestingly, the racialized opposition to te reo Maori is most evident among older, White New Zealanders. This suggests the
potential for change among younger New Zealanders and New Zealand’s increasingly diverse migrant population, both of whom appear more open to the ongoing development of societal bilingualism in English and te reo Maori
.


Abstract: Migration has been identified as a priority area for policy responses by both the federal and provincial/territorial governments yet, much of our knowledge about migration is not premised on addressing current xenophobic and racist narratives about migrants. The purpose of this research is an interrogation of Canada’s colonialism, imperialism, and racialization, which produce specific oppressive policies and practices that have impacted my family. This research is premised on the understanding that in the space between what is known about migration in Canada and what is not, a great deal of narrative and interpretive work is done that makes assumptions about migrants, specifically forcibly displaced people from the Global South. Through a critical autoethnography focused on my lived experiences as a descendant of forcibly displaced Chinese-Vietnamese people living in a settler colonial nation state, this study critiques to what extent these assumptions are founded, and to what extent they represent a socio-political climate in which migration is set out as particular problems requiring a legal and policing solution. In particular, my analysis centres anti-colonialism and anti-racism, shifting to resistance to systemic violence and liberation, while considering the discursive and on-the-ground effects of racist, colonial, and imperial policies and practice. Set against the backdrop of the rise of white nationalism, xenophobia, and racism across all levels of government and academia, and the general public, the results of this study produce a counter-narrative focused on the intersection of forced displacement and race in a settler colonial context, which is both timely and urgent.


Access the article here.



Abstract: Despite global and national calls and efforts to bring Indigenous knowledge and peoples into engineering and Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) education, these populations continue to struggle in these fields because their ways of knowing are not recognized or legitimized due to settler colonialism. Consequently, Indigenous peoples view Indigenous knowledge and STEM education as two separate entities. Decolonization research is in the beginning stages to develop culturally relevant STEM education for Indigenous populations to heal their identities and bring back their knowledge and its motivations. This narrative literature review focuses on analyzing these implementations of reconnecting STEM education and Indigenous knowledge in North America using the research question: How has Indigenous knowledge of North America been (re)incorporated into culturally relevant STEM education? Using review procedures including specified database search terms and inclusion and exclusion criteria, I identified 20 articles focused around incorporating Indigenous knowledge into STEM education as a form of culturally relevant pedagogy. Using inductive coding and thematic analysis, I identified three themes: centering Indigenous ways of knowing, ensuring Elder involvement, and recognizing all knowledge holders. By comparing exemplary implementations of Indigenous knowledge into STEM education for all three themes, I illustrated the meaning and benefits of each. Finding the common thread between the three themes provides one answer for the research question. I propose spiritual knowledge as the binding thread that connects the themes and (re)connects Indigenous knowledge and STEM education. Spirituality can become a theorizing space to help with the decolonizing of engineering education by challenging the dominant knowledge types and bringing in other ways of knowing.





Abstract: This article is part of the collaborative research project Populist Publics. Housed at Carleton University (www.carleton.ca/populistpublics), it applies a data-driven analysis of online hate networks to trace how false framings of the historical past, what we call historical misinformation, circulates across platforms, shaping the politics of the center alongside the fringes. We cull large datasets from social media platforms and run them through a variety of different programs to help visualize how harmful speech and civilizational rhetoric about race, ethnicity, immigration, multiculturalism, gender equality, and LGBTQ+ rights are circulated by far-right groups across borders, noting specifically when and how they are taken up in the mainstream as legitimate discourse. Our interest is in how the distortion of the historical record is used to build alternative collective memories of the past so as to undermine minority rights and cultures in the present. We began with a basic question: To what extent is this actually new? As much as the atomized publics of our current day create ideal conditions for radical ideas to fester and circulate, it was obvious to us that we needed to look for linkages across time, drawing on interdisciplinary methods from the fields of history, media and communication, and data science to identify the tactics, strategies, and repertoires among such groups and individuals. By analyzing German-Canadian relations in particular, what follows is a first attempt to piece together some of these connections, with a focus on far-right hate groups—homegrown and imported—in the settler colonial project that is today’s Canada.