Access the volume here.

Cover Image: “Fuck you colonial Fucks you murdered our children at the residential concentration schools. Everyday is a orange day With no justice (2022)” by Lawrence Paul Yuxweluptun





Abstract: The Canadian Truth and Reconciliation Commission’s primary “call to action” is to reduce the number of Indigenous children in out-of-home care in this country. Yet, Indigenous children continue to be apprehended into the child welfare system at rates three times higher than at the peak of the Indian Residential School period (1831-1996). Though there is increasing research on the negative impacts of child removal on Indigenous children, families, and communities there is less research that records and analyzes existing community-based and institutional strategies that prevent, resist, or refuse child welfare interventions broadly and child removal specifically. In partnership with Indigenous caregivers on Vancouver Island, and using a combination of ethnographic and participatory action research methodologies, my dissertation aims to answer one key question: In the context of ongoing and disproportionate colonial child removal, how do Indigenous peoples make and maintain kin? This dissertation foregrounds Indigenous scholarship on refusal, resistance, and resurgence, as well as anthropological analyses of kinship and relationality to answer this question, demonstrating how Indigenous communities reconstitute ancestral care roles, resist colonial extraction, build relational solidarities, and affirm their self-determination despite ongoing colonial interference into the realm of the family. By focusing on Indigenous peoples’ resistance and resilience within the system, this research talks back to a problematic narrative of Indigenous victimhood, illuminating the creative and strategic ways Indigenous caregivers and providers sustain kin both within and on the margins of the settler state.



Abstract: From the early twentieth century to the present day, health professionals have commented on the exceptional nature of Inuit cancer patterns. Over the past hundred years, Inuit have been thought to possess a unique distribution of disease—characterized, at different points, by higherthan average rates of lung, cervical and salivary gland cancer, lower than average rates of breast cancer, and substantial and growing rates of the disease overall. This thesis explores why Inuit cancer patterns have been characterized in this way and discusses their contemporary implications for Inuit health. This project argues that past and current representations of Inuit cancer incidence evolved in tandem with geographic pathology—a branch of cancer research (and predecessor of cancer epidemiology) that posited that examining the cancer rates of colonial populations could help shed light on the disease’s underlying causes. I examine how rising scientific internationalism, increased Arctic militarization, hierarchical discourses of civilization and human development, and settler policies of protectionism, segregation, assimilation, and experimentation not only allowed geographic pathology to take hold in Canada, but also transformed Inuit Nunangat into an important site in the national fight against the disease. Over the course of six-case studies, I show how Inuit served as central nodes and excluded margins of cancer knowledge production. Canadian researchers used Inuit as resources for generating etiological hypotheses and developing new diagnostic imaging devices and screening techniques. However, most of these medical insights and interventions were exported to southern Canadian urban centres—leaving Inuit to contend with the still-unfolding aftermaths of geographic pathology and its relationship to colonial rule’s historical construction, and attempted elimination, of otherness. To assess the evolution and ramifications of Arctic cancer epidemiology, this thesis adopts an interdisciplinary approach, juxtaposing archival materials with contemporary accounts centered on Indigenous social actors. Oscillating between different methods, sources, and temporalities reveals how historical events resurface within contemporary conditions. It also contributes to growing scholarly interest in how cancer is understood and managed in the context of colonial and post-colonial relations of power and allows us to reflect on how settler-colonial structures produce and continue to pervade cancer service delivery in northern settings.