« Older posts
Newer posts »

Libertarian settler indigenism: Andy Lamey, ‘Libertarian Support for Indigenous Rights’, Southern Journal of Philosophy, 2025

01Oct25

Abstract: The most prominent philosophical defenders of indigenous rights have been egalitarian liberals such as Will Kymlicka and Alan Patten. Libertarians, on the other hand, are often critical of such arrangements. Given the prevalence of this view, it is natural to think that no form of libertarianism is compatible with a distinct set of legal rights for native people. But the work of one of libertarianism’s most distinguished defenders is striking in the degree to which it ratifies the liberal case for indigenous rights. In support of this claim, I offer a reconstruction of arguments drawn from the work of Robert Nozick. I start with his libertarian framework for utopia and the many ways in which it legitimizes separate and distinct native communities. I then note how any state, even a minimal one, inevitably places indigenous minorities at a disadvantage. Given this, Nozick’s libertarianism lends support to the liberal conception of native rights as a form of compensation for state-imposed disadvantage. I justify this claim by noting how a libertarian principle of compensation overlaps with and validates the understanding of compensation that features in the liberal rationale for native rights. While my primary motivation is to bolster the legitimacy of indigenous rights, I also hope to show how the aspects of libertarianism that vindicate such rights have bearing on broader debates about Nozick’s work. Charles Mills, for example, has argued that Nozick’s libertarianism displays a colonialist mindset, one that Mills takes to be representative of Anglo-American political philosophy as a whole. That fact that libertarianism lends support to a theory of indigenous rights suggests that it does not suffer from this and other charges.


Filed under: Uncategorized   |  Closed

The disasters of settler colonialism: Ranjan Datta, ‘Settler Colonialism and Human-Created Disaster in Indigenous Communities in Bangladesh’, in Ranjan Datta, Decolonizing Climate Adaptation, Springer, 2025, pp. 23-33

01Oct25

Abstract: This chapter highlights the intensified impacts of settler colonialism and human-induced environmental crises on Indigenous communities in Bangladesh, with a focus on the Chittagong Hill Tracts (CHT), coastal regions, and wetland areas. It examines the multifaceted challenges these communities face, including land disputes, deforestation, large-scale development projects, and biodiversity loss, all of which are exacerbated by inequities in policy-making and governance frameworks. The chapter highlights how these issues are deeply rooted in historical and ongoing colonial practices that marginalize Indigenous populations, disrupt traditional land-based knowledge, and undermine sustainable practices. The chapter aims to achieve several key objectives. First, it explores the primary human-created factors, such as land encroachment, deforestation, and industrial development, that heighten climate vulnerabilities for Indigenous communities. Second, it centers the voices of Indigenous Elders and Knowledge-keepers to document their perspectives on these crises and the solutions they envision. Third, it emphasizes the importance of traditional land-based knowledge and cultural practices as critical strategies for climate adaptation and resilience. Finally, the chapter advocates for transformative policy changes, including the recognition of Indigenous land rights, support for self-determination, and the integration of community-led approaches into climate policies. By addressing these objectives, the chapter underscores the urgent need to decolonize climate governance and adopt collaborative approaches that amplify Indigenous voices and knowledge.


Filed under: Uncategorized   |  Closed

Parking settlers: Miho Trudeau, ‘Problematizing the sociocultural production of nature: Considering settler colonialism in Confederation Park’, Canadian Geographies, 2025

01Oct25

Abstract: This manuscript provides a viewpoint on issues of settler colonialism in relation to natural playground contexts. Reflections emerged while conducting a multi‐site study on natural playground development and usage in Calgary, Canada. One site was situated in a large urban green space, Confederation Park, and illustrated the materialization of green spaces as a settler‐colonial project.


Filed under: Uncategorized   |  Closed

Epistemic reparations anyone? Yann Allard-Tremblay ‘A great ox stands in your mind: decolonial caution about epistemic reparations and the right to be known’, Philosophical Studies, 2025

29Sep25

Abstract: Jennifer Lackey has recently argued that victims of gross injustices and epistemic harms not only have a right to know, but also a right to be known, i.e., to share and have their experiences heard. This right is associated with a duty to provide epistemic reparations, notably in bearing witness to victims. The epistemic harms with which Lackey is concerned are features of settler colonialism that call for such epistemic reparations. I seek to raise caution about the pursuit of epistemic reparations, however, especially through bearing witness and testimony, in settler colonial contexts. I argue that settler colonial epistemic environments constitute morasses of unknowing, where settlers are subjectified in ways that severely burden their capacity to properly understand and know victims of epistemic harms. In settler colonial contexts, I argue, epistemic reparations through bearing witness and testimonies risk being both unproductive and pernicious. They risk being unproductive precisely because victims are at risk of not being properly understood without transforming the material and subjective features of the settler colonial epistemic environment. They further risk being pernicious given settler colonial dynamics that tend to defuse the critical potential of testimonies. To ensure a more thorough pursuit of the right to be known, we must therefore also consider the required decolonial transformation of the structures and subjectivities that make epistemic harm possible.


Filed under: Uncategorized   |  Closed

Food for anticolonial thought: Salena Fay Tramel, Annelien Groten, ‘Resisting forced starvation and territory grabs through food sovereignty efforts in Gaza’, The Journal of Peasant Studies, 2025

29Sep25

Abstract: Undermining the ability of Palestinians to feed themselves is central to the genocide underway in the Gaza Strip, resulting in mass famine and forced starvation. Israel is achieving this aim through territory grabbing across Gaza’s farmlands and fisheries on one side, and through control and weaponization of humanitarian aid on the other. Food sovereignty could not be more relevant here – to save lives, and as a political project to resist land and water grabs. This article highlights food sovereignty efforts in Gaza from the perspectives of Palestinian grassroots organizers working in unfathomable conditions to resist the erasure of their people.


Filed under: Uncategorized   |  Closed

Settler no-go zones: Felicity Collins, ‘Seven Versions of an Australian Badland and two films: Jindabyne and The Drover’s Wife: The Legend of Molly Johnson’, Continuum, 2025

29Sep25

Abstract: As a debt of remembrance, I begin by extracting seven versions of Ross Gibson (1956–2023) from my heavily annotated copy of Seven Versions of an Australian Badland. I then draw on Seven Versions to illuminate a no-go zone film, Jindabyne and a badland film, The Drover’s Wife: The Legend of Molly Johnson. Both films were shot on Ngarigo, Ngambri and Walgalu Country, transformed in recent decades by the Snowy Mountains Hydro-Electric Scheme (1945–74), a nation-building project that I viewed from the back seat of the family car in the 1960s. In my discussion of settler-colonial blind spots in Ray Lawrence’s Jindabyne, I draw on Gibson’s concept of no-go zones and Deborah Bird Rose’s concept of ethical violence. Turning to the rabid sexual and racial violence unleashed on the body of Molly Johnson in Purcell’s badland film (2022), I deploy Gibson’s concept of ethical murk with reference to Jonathan Lear’s concept of radical hope.


Filed under: Uncategorized   |  Closed

Settlers riding off into the sunset: Melissa Beattie, ‘”This is where the cowboy rides away?” The Magnificent Seven and settler colonialism’, CST Online, 25/10/24

29Sep25

Excerpt: For those unfamiliar with the series (or the film it is loosely adapted from), it features seven gunslingers from various backgrounds who are, in the pilot episode, hired by an Indigenous village to protect them against former Confederate soldiers who are threatening them. They eventually settle in a local town, employed as law enforcement officials with extremely limited judicial oversight. The Seven consist of the taciturn ‘man in black,’ Chris Larabee (Michael Biehn), quiet bounty hunter wrongfully accused of murder Vin Tanner (Eric Close), ladies’ man Buck Wilmington (Dale Midkiff), defrocked priest and (intermittently) recovering alcoholic Josiah Sanchez (Ron Perlman), young, adventure-seeking JD Dunne (Andrew Kavovit), escaped slave turned doctor Nathan Jackson (Rick Worthy) and Southern gambler, grifter and money-addict Ezra Standish (Anthony Starke). Rounding out the cast is journalist, niece of the local circuit judge and love interest for Chris, Mary Travis (Laurie Holden). The series does a number of things differently to the usual portrayals of gunslingers due to its regular setting, most notably through leveraging the homosociality of the seven leads to allow their characters to develop and discuss their feelings, relationships and traumas with each other. But the setting also allows for discourses related to settler colonialism which is what this blog will focus upon.


Filed under: Uncategorized   |  Closed

The gendered makers of settlers: Sarah Stegeman, Becoming Americo-Liberian: African American Women, Culture, and the Creation of Liberia, 1840-1912, PhD dissertation, Syracuse University, 2025

29Sep25

Abstract: This dissertation highlights the role of early Black American women settlers in creating a distinct Americo-Liberian identity that served as the centerpiece of Liberian independence. Most histories of colonization focus on male settlers and consider settlement a transplanting of American culture in Liberia. The women of the Waring, Lewis, and Roberts family established new homes in Liberia, and their homemaking efforts sustained the colony and the nation. This examination of elite Americo -Liberian women’s efforts to present their domestic skills, educational attainment, and proper behavior to a global audience was essential to nation-building in Liberia. Women’s cultivation of kinship and familial structures was also central to this unique Americo-Liberian identity, which was dedicated to maintaining the respectability of their elite social status in Liberia and establishing their difference from indigenous Liberians. Rather than looking inward to indigenous Liberians to help build the nation, these women looked outward to the U.S. and Great Britain for support. This project brings women and domesticity into the history of Americo-Liberians through print, material culture, and manuscript sources from the United States, Britain, and West Africa, and offers a new focus on the women settlers who created and represented Liberia in the nineteenth century.


Filed under: Uncategorized   |  Closed

The hauntology of settler domesticity: Lize van Robbroeck, ‘A Hauntology of Colonial and Settler Domesticity: The Material Semiotics of Leora Farber’s Still Life Installation, Disquieting Domesticities/Vestiges of Violence’, in Dawn Woolley, Paula Chambers (eds), Going Feral: Speculative Approaches to Animism in the Arts, Vernon Press, 2025

27Sep25

Access the chapter here.


Filed under: Uncategorized   |  Closed

Settlers on Mars (as in ‘Fascisti su Marte’ [2006])! Andrew Targowski, ‘Beyond Earth: Strategic Pathways to a Multiplanet Civilization and the Case for Mars Settlement’, Comparative Civilizations Review, 93, 1, 2025, #12

27Sep25

Abstract: This research provides a comprehensive and interdisciplinary exploration of the transition toward a multiplanet civilization, with a special focus on Mars as humanity’s first major step beyond Earth. By addressing technological, political, economic, and ethical dimensions, it aims to inform policymakers, scientists, and the public about the feasibility, challenges, and philosophical implications of interplanetary expansion. As humanity approaches the threshold of becoming a multiplanet civilization, it faces unprecedented scientific, technological, economic, and ethical challenges. This paper explores the rationale, methodologies, and critical considerations for establishing sustainable human settlements beyond Earth, with a particular focus on Mars. By analyzing advances in propulsion, habitat design, planetary terraforming, governance structures, and economic viability, this research outlines a roadmap for interplanetary expansion. The discussion integrates multidisciplinary perspectives from astrophysics, bioengineering, space law, and environmental ethics, providing an actionable framework for the transition toward a multiplanet species. Keywords: astrobiology, Blue Origin, CNSA, Earth, ESA, interplanetary age, Mars colonization, Mars City, Moon, Musk Elon, Musk City, multiplanet civilization, multiplanet species, NASA, space economics, space governance, space philosophy, space technology, SpaceX.


Filed under: Uncategorized   |  Closed
« Older posts
Newer posts »