Abstract: Emerging discussions on the “settler colonial city” present a new agenda for gentrification research in settler colonial contexts. Accordingly, this paper examines the extent to which the gentrification literature engages with settler colonial dynamics, identifying three overarching approaches. While a small but growing body of literature frames gentrification as a contemporary mechanism of Indigenous erasure, other approaches engage with concepts of settler colonialism in abstraction from contemporary Indigenous life and claims to urban space. The paper argues the persistence of these abstractions undermines the recognition of settler colonial gentrification as Indigenous erasure and limits the current potential for the gentrification literature to contribute to the disruption of settler colonial relations. In response, there is a need for further empirical and theoretical work that attends to the impulse for Indigenous elimination as a unique dimension of gentrification in settler colonial contexts. Insight from literature on the “settler colonial city” underlines the particular importance of extending conceptions of anti-gentrification resistance to emphasize Indigenous refusal of gentrified futures and examine how (settler-led) anti-gentrification responses disrupt or sustain settler colonial relations. These directions provide opportunities to (re)conceptualize gentrification and its responses in ways that address the reproduction of (dis)possessory settler colonial relations while recognizing “the flourishing of Indigenous life” 


Abstract: White feminist theorizations of rape privilege patriarchy as the main source of gender violence, ultimately centering white cisgender women. In doing so, white women are treated as subject in anti-rape discourse while the violence inflicted on women of color is rendered as secondary and insignificant. Conversely, Indigenous and Black feminist analytics center Indigenous and Black women’s experiences with sexual violence, ultimately pointing to the ways in which rape has been used as a tool to perpetuate heteropatriarchy, settler-colonialism, and anti- Black racism. For instance, Deer (2015) explains that Indigenous women experience disproportionately high rates of sexual violence that spans generations. She reasons that the systematic imposition of patriarchy is largely a European project (p. 18). Additionally, Crenshaw (1991) argues that anti- rape law and judicial reforms are not built to address and attend to the unique needs of Black women (p. 1270) because they relegate women of color to “a location that resists telling” (p. 1242). Thus, there is clear connection between the historical European imposition of patriarchy and rape to anti-rape law and judicial reforms that work to silence, violate, and work against women of color. It is for this reason that I argue that rape is an integral tool of settler colonialism and white supremacy. Additionally, in this project, I ask the following questions: How do settler-colonial and anti-Black systems determine what is as is not the truth of rape and why? In other words, when have settler colonial and anti-Black systems justified and rationalized rape and why? Who is implicated by these truths? How can we disassemble these truths despite their existence and implications? In order to answer these questions, I turn to Indigenous and Black feminism to inform my analysis of chosen sites of study. Specifically, I employ a performance approach to personal narrative to analyze legal testimonials and media projects that center Black and Indigenous women. Furthermore, the overall purpose of this project is to theorize rape as a central tool of settler colonialism and anti-Blackness.