Abstract: Processes of Indigenization under way in Canada aim to bring more Indigenous students and faculty to mainstream colleges and universities. These Indigenization initiatives are critical components that work toward reconciling systemic and societal inequalities between Indigenous and non-Indigenous within higher education. Despite these important efforts, institutions of higher education were founded on and continue to reflect the goals and norms of a settler colonial society, and such contexts constitute a complicated and evolving environment for Indigenous people. Based on interviews with 23 Indigenous faculty, students, staff, and community members, this paper explores their experiences at an Indigenizing university. We outline how encounters with ongoing colonialism and contradictions at an Indigenizing university both generated new pain and echoed existing historical trauma. In many ways, explicit and publicized institutional efforts to incorporate Indigenous people and perspectives, while needed and valued, simultaneously magnified the cultural dissonance, biases, and power structures within the institution. Consequently, participants identified needs for healing that were insufficiently supported and also constrained by institutional logics. This study calls attention to the settler colonial dynamics that often persist within North American colleges and universities in their efforts to target and recruit Indigenous students and how such institutions should support robust and culturally appropriate healing practices and resources that depart from default institutional understandings and operative processes. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved)




Abstract: Despite contact with the Zionist movement by some cabinet members prior to the First World War, and efforts to advocate for the movement and gain support for its goals, the British did not fully begin to come to terms with the aims, intentions, and methods of Zionism in Palestine until after the Balfour Declaration. Despite a commitment to support Zionism it was only after 1917 that a serious discussion and analysis of what the Jewish National Home would entail, how it would be achieved, and what British support meant was undertaken. In order to better explore this development, the ideas and history of Settler Colonialism in the British Empire provide a framework within which the relationships that developed in Palestine can be explored. This approach will outline the encounter between the colonial administration on the ground and the settlers, and the efforts of each to influence the imperial governments perspective and policy on settlement. In doing so it will demonstrate the ways in which the practical development of Zionism in Palestine followed a similar pattern in the British relationship with its Setter Colonies. As the British government came into greater contact with, and gained greater experience of, the attitudes and demands of the settlers on the ground, their understanding of what was being facilitated in Palestine grew. Alongside this knowledge and understanding of the settler’s intentions for Palestine, was an awareness of the means by which they would be achieved. As with other cases of settlement the position of the indigenous population, and the autonomy granted to the settlers was a point of contention between the imperial/colonial governors and the local/settler populations. Building on this developing understanding, the thesis will address the emergence of population transfer in the context of radicalisation in Settler Colonies. The British awareness of this option, raised as it was at an early point of British support for the Jewish National Home, demonstrate the initial, explicit indications of the implicit structure, and outcomes, of the Settlement project Britain was bound to facilitate. Alongside this, the concerns of the colonial and imperial governments, their resistance, as well as complicity and enablement will be assessed in the context of their discourse on the Zionist movement and its activities. Furthermore, while the British made these observations and analyses of the Zionist movement and the likely consequences of colonisation, their awareness of prior cases of settlement, and the impact these cases had on British deliberations, will be noted.



Abstract: Background: The disproportionately high number of Aboriginal crossover children traversing child protection and youth justice systems is a longstanding concern across countries with historic legacies of settler-colonialism. Aims: This study explored what key stakeholders who directly work with Aboriginal crossover children perceive are the unique characteristics and service needs of this group, and explored their views of current service system responses for Aboriginal crossover children. Methods: Twenty-five semi-structured consultations were conducted with judicial officers (magistrates and judges), police prosecutors and officers, lawyers, child protection youth justice and education professionals, child and family mental health clinicians, and representatives from non-government agencies working with crossover children in South Eastern Australia. Three out of the sample of 82 participants identified as Aboriginal. Findings: Thematic analysis revealed that key stakeholders noted substantial social disadvantage, maltreatment, and household adversity among Aboriginal crossover children, alongside systemic barriers to cultural connection and cultural identity development, and the impact of intergenerational trauma for this group. Deficient child protection responses were often strongly emphasised, however findings demonstrated considerable disagreement among key stakeholders regarding the nature of Aboriginal crossover children’s service needs, and what might constitute effective responses to these. This study highlights the need for a common understanding and frameworks among service providers working collaboratively to support Aboriginal crossover children.