Access the chapter here.






Description: The volume Global Indigenous Horror is meant to elicit discussion. Contributions herein are an exploration of what Indigenous Horror is and to whom. Beginning with a preface by Cheyenne and Arapaho Horror writer Shane Hawk, the book is structured into four parts, and grounded in an Indigenous journey/ing approach to knowledge acquisition, as advocated by various Indigenous scholars. Part 1 focuses on Indigenous ways of knowing and theorizing. Part 2 offers further examples of Indigenous Horror in the context of cultural and literary practices, while further extending discourses discussed in the book to the literal level. Part 3 continues the exploratory ‘journey’ with examples of Indigenizing Horror and Gothic from various global perspectives. Part 4 contains illustrative interviews with speculative writers of Indigenous descent—including Shane Hawk (Cheyenne and Arapaho), Dan Rabarts (Ngāti Porou), Stephen Graham Jones (Blackfoot), Gregory C. Loui (Kānaka Maoli), and Gina Cole (Pasifika). Part 4 offers actualizations of hypothetical concepts in the pages of Horror and other speculative fiction. The Epilogue chapter is an act of “Dis/insp/secting Global Indigenous Horror”—as a field of study, a hybrid genre, and a volume. This epilogue is comprised of an academic conversation or dialogue between settler and Indigenous scholars, and as metacommentary is a counterpoint to interviews with Indigenous writers in Part 4. By extending the dialogue about what Global Indigenous Horror is, the epilogue furthers the synoptic praxis of the volume. In the process (or journey/ing) towards an understanding of Global Indigenous Horror, contributions offer a methodological toolbox to investigate cultural practices and literary (and supra-literary) approaches to Indigenous Horror, ways of theorizing, and ways of knowing.



Abstract: This article investigates the connections between emancipation in Britain’s slave colonies and settler colonisation through the policies of Henry George Grey, 3rd Earl Grey (styled Viscount Howick 1807–1845). When Grey became Under- Secretary for the Colonies in his father’s administration in late 1830, he turned his attention to emigration, colonial land administration, and slavery. As an adherent of the new principles of colonisation – promoted over the previous eighteen months by Edward Gibbon Wakefield – Grey furthered policies to commodify and appropriate colonial land, compelling the landless to labour for them. Notably, between 1831–1833, in dialogue with Colonial Office staff, Grey applied these principles to a radical slavery amelioration Order in Council, and subsequently to a scheme for abolishing slavery in the Caribbean, aiming to compel emancipated slaves to continue to work. Disappointingly for Grey, this plan was dropped at the last minute in favour of a compromise with the West Indies interest. However as Grey later pointed out, its principles remained a blueprint for colonial policy over following decades, including issues of free labour, imperial land policy, colonisation, and labour emigration. This article re-examines the shared principles within Grey’s vision for the amelioration, abolition and aftermath of slavery and their application to numerous post- emancipation contexts beyond the new settler colonies of Australasia, to demonstrate the ways in which achieving the abolition of slavery and expanding territory through conquest were interrelated, not separate, processes. These principles map the emergence of new forms of labour coercion within the development of a global free labour market, and reveal the ways in which the process of privatising Indigenous Country was foundational to racial capitalism.