Abstract: The ethics of consuming meat, especially when viewed through the lens of Indigenous knowledge systems, presents a unique framework for understanding human-animal relationships and ecological sustainability. Through their traditional ecological knowledge (TEK), Indigenous cultures emphasize a holistic and reciprocal approach to animal husbandry and hunting, viewing these practices as sacred and essential to maintaining balance with the natural world. These practices, rooted in respect and a deep understanding of the environment, contrast sharply with the industrialized meat production systems that dominate contemporary agriculture, particularly in the production of beef, pork, and chicken. Industrial meat production, driven by profit and efficiency, has led to environmental degradation, animal suffering, and a growing disconnect between people and the animals they consume. This thesis explores these ethical concerns, advocating for a reconsideration of meat production through an Indigenous perspective that stresses sustainability, respect, and interconnectedness. Through case studies of the Cherokee Nation, Makah Indian Tribe, and Inuit Nunangat, and an exploration of their relationships with buffalo and orca whales, this study seeks to address the gaps in current literature, particularly the underrepresentation of Indigenous voices in discussions of animal rights and the meat industry. By examining Indigenous narratives, oral traditions, and animal stories, the thesis underscores the importance of these cultural practices in fostering respect for nature and ethical stewardship. Ultimately, this work challenges the current trajectory of industrial meat production and highlights the potential for Indigenous knowledge and practices to shape a more ethical, sustainable, and culturally respectful future for food systems and human-animal relations.





Description: A renowned historian debunks current distortion and myths about European colonialism in the New World and restores much needed balance to our understanding of the past. Was America really “stolen” from the Indians? Was Columbus a racist? Were Indians really peace-loving, communistic environmentalists? Did Europeans commit “genocide” in the New World? It seems that almost everyone—from CNN to the New York Times to angry students pulling down statues of our founders—believes that America’s history is a shameful tale of racism, exploitation, and cruelty. In Not Stolen, renowned historian Jeff Fynn-Paul systematically dismantles this relentlessly negative view of U.S. history, arguing that it is based on shoddy methods, misinformation, and outright lies about the past. America was not “stolen” from the Indians but fairly purchased piece by piece in a thriving land market. Nor did European settlers cheat, steal, murder, rape or purposely infect them with smallpox to the extent that most people believe. No genocide occurred—either literal or cultural—and the decline of Native populations over time is not due to violence but to assimilation and natural demographic processes. Fynn Paul not only debunks these toxic myths, but provides a balanced portrait of this complex historical process over 500 years. The real history of Native and European relations will surprise you. Not only is this not a tale of shameful sins and crimes against humanity—it is more inspiring than you ever dared to imagine.


Abstract: The situation of Indigenous peoples in Brazil is marked by persistent historical and structural inequalities that hinder the full realization of their fundamental rights—particularly those related to land, cultural integrity, and self-determination. Although constitutional provisions and international agreements, such as International Labour Organization (ILO) Convention No. 169, formally safeguard these rights, their implementation is undermined by institutional inertia, delays in land demarcation procedures, and regressive legal measures—notably the “time frame” thesis. These dynamics exacerbate territorial disputes and expose Indigenous populations to structural violence, criminalization, and environmental degradation. This study offers a critical analysis of the key challenges facing Indigenous peoples in contemporary Brazil, with particular emphasis on land-related conflicts, ethnopolitical resistance, and the limitations of current public policy frameworks. Drawing on a qualitative methodology grounded in recent academic and institutional literature, the research employs content and thematic analysis to explore analytical categories such as legal coloniality, environmental racism, and Indigenous self-determination.The findings suggest that Indigenous territorial struggles transcend demands for land recognition, constituting broader assertions of collective rights, alternative epistemologies, and ways of life that challenge an exclusionary and extractivist development model. Strengthening Indigenous political agency, ensuring effective land demarcation, and implementing intercultural and participatory public policies are essential steps toward dismantling colonial structures and promoting socio-environmental justice. Recognizing Indigenous peoples as political subjects is a prerequisite for building a truly pluralistic, democratic, and equitable society.


Description: The histories of Europe and Africa are closely intertwined. At times, this closeness has been emphasized, at other times, suppressed and denied. Since the nineteenth century, European imperial powers have carved up the continent of Africa among themselves, drawing borders and charting shorelines; in the process, inventing Africa. This was a project anchored in ancient Greek and Roman representations of Africa. For Italy, colonialism in Africa was a matter of consolidating its project of national unification, nominally completed in 1870 with the capture of Rome. By asserting its position as an imperial power, the young nation of Italy hoped to join the club of European nation-states and, in so doing, be rid of the perception that it was a country somewhere in between Europe and Africa. Yet, Italy’s colonial endeavour in Africa was also a project with deep historical meaning. Italy posed its imperial project in Africa as a national return to territory which was rightfully Italian. Italian ideologues of imperialism based this claim on the history of Roman history on the continent. When Italian soldiers disembarked on the beaches of Libya during Italy’s invasion of 1911-1912, and came across the ruins of Roman imperialism, they were, according to prominent cultural and political figures in Italy, rediscovering the traces of their ancestors. Yet, when Italian imperial ambitions set their sights on East Africa, regions that had not been conquered by Rome, how could Italy nevertheless shape its imperial project in the image of ancient Rome? This book charts this story. Beginning with Italy’s first imperial endeavours on the African continent in the last decades of the nineteenth century and continuing right through to Italy’s current attitudes towards Africa, this book argues that empire in Africa was a central aspect of Italian nation-building, and that this was a project which anchored itself in memories of ancient Rome in Africa. Although Fascism’s invasion of Ethiopia (1935-1936) is the best-known moment of Italian imperialism in Africa, this book shows that Italian imperialism, modelled on ancient Rome, has a history which long predates Mussolini’s movement, and has a legacy which continues to be acutely felt.


Abstract: This paper interrogates the contemporary transformation of the Kashmir conflict through the theoretical lenses of settler colonialism, Gramscian hegemony, and David Harvey’s concept of accumulation by dispossession. In the aftermath of the revocation of Article 370, the Bhartiya Janata Party-led Indian government has intensified its Hindutva-oriented policies in Indian Administered Jammu and Kashmir, employing coercive legal frameworks, demographic reengineering, and cultural repression. The study situates these developments within a settler colonial framework, wherein state-led infrastructural expansion and legal manipulation facilitate the displacement of indigenous populations and the restructuring of territorial control. Simultaneously, the BJP’s invocation of development and normalcy operates as a hegemonic project, relying not solely on coercion but on the cultural and institutional internalization of Hindu nationalist ideology to legitimize domination and suppress dissent. These processes are further examined through the prism of accumulation by dispossession, as land acquisition, ecological degradation, and the restructuring of the region’s agrarian economy disproportionately benefit state and corporate interests at the expense of Kashmir’s local population. The paper argues that the BJP’s policies represent an intertwined project of ideological, territorial, and economic domination, reshaping the identity, demography, and political landscape of the region under the guise of development.