Excerpt: John Mulgan’s Man Alone (1939) is a classic of New Zealand literature. Guido Morselli’s Il comunista (published posthumously in 1976 but written in 1964-65) was recently translated into English as The Communist and released as part of the NYRB Classics Series. Man Alone tells the story of an English World War One veteran’s migration to New Zealand, his ordeals during the Depression and in New Zealand’s wilderness, and eventually his decision, after his return to Europe, to volunteer in the international brigades supporting the Republic in the Spanish Civil War. The Communist tells the story of an Italian communist organiser and member of parliament who had fought in the Spanish Civil War, who had subsequently emigrated to the US after defeat, and had returned to Italy after the end of World War Two. The novel also narrates its protagonist’s ordeal, as his unorthodox militancy leads to a serious political crisis precipitated by dissent on a point of Marxist interpretation. Both novels focus on the politically formative experiences that a new life elsewhere has for their protagonists, even if both displacements are provisional. Even though they were written a generation apart and contributed to completely different literary traditions, the two novels can be productively read together because they both tease out the interaction between political militancy and displacement.




Access the article here.


Access the article here.



Abstract: The management of wildland fire in North America is premised on fire suppression, as has been the case for much of the last century. As the roles of wildland fire in ecosystem functions are better understood and the adverse impacts of fire suppression are made clear, wildland fire suppression approaches are being re-evaluated. In protected areas such as Canadian national parks, this realization has led to the reintroduction of fire to park landscapes to achieve ecological and risk reduction goals. Through a multi-sited institutional analysis of Parks Canada, this research explores the complex relationship between conservation, fire management, and the maintenance of value in Canadian national parks. In this study I position Parks Canada within the context of Canadian settler colonialism and Canadian national parks as an ongoing component of the relationship between settlers and Canadian territory. I analyze how fire management has developed and is enacted in Canadian national parks and pay particular attention to the practice of prescribed burning as an alternative to full suppression. I argue that the political-economic context of national parks along with the logics of species conservation and so-called ‘ecological
integrity’ narrate contemporary fire management practices in Canada’s national parks. I also show how a set of more-than-human actors, and the process of fire itself, are enlisted to carry out these mandates while also functioning as important companions in identifying the limits of these
contemporary policies. I argue that Parks Canada’s dominion over fire and landscapes that burn is not absolute and that this is a productive context to think-with in the so-called Anthropocene.