Abstract: How does elimination work in Brazil? After a brief history of miscegenation as assimilation/elimination, this article addresses this question through the experiences of one urban indigenous group (Aldeia Maracanã) and one urban Afro-descendant quilombo (Sacopã) in Rio de Janeiro. Based on fieldwork conducted between 2014 and 2017, the article traces the continuities of settler colonialism in independent Brazil, including the multicultural turn of the 1988 Constitution. I centralise the lived experiences and struggles of the two groups, whose intersecting politics are caught within the inescapability of being ‘within Empire’ while having to imagine a politics outside of it (Simpson 2014). I then contribute to Settler Colonial Theory from this perspective, challenging its land-labour binary, for blacks and indígenas have both been affected by processes of elimination, dispossession, labour exploitation, and exclusion (racism). Moreover, miscegenation/assimilation has not been merely ‘a kind of death’, as Patrick Wolfe has portrayed it (Wolfe, 2006). Miscegenation has also functioned as the space from which indigenous and black peoples have resurged, survived, and thrived. When we engage critically with the political options available to these groups within settler colonialism, we are forced to ask: What does it mean to talk about de-colonisation in Brazil?



Abstract: From the fifteenth century to the nineteenth century, European colonizers worked to eliminate bison and Indigenous peoples in the territory known today as “North America.” In this dissertation, I argue that today’s American settler institutions, or facilities established on
dispossessed lands, continue to invoke the symbol of the bison in their efforts to maintain their control of said lands. As I explain, the US federal government, media, and scholars have problematized how nineteenth century settler institutions exterminated bison to starve select
Indigenous peoples into submission, thus clearing a path to settle the American West. Notably, the logic behind this act of white settler supremacy was synecdochal in that American settlers communicated about the bison’s health, taken as an integral part of Native America, as indicative
of the health of Native America writ large. Yet, scholars have not questioned whether settler institutions have engaged in comparable patterns of communication after this tragedy. Accordingly, I employ mixed methods, including participant-observation and textual analysis of social, print, and digital media, to outline how today’s settler institutions more recently have
invoked the symbol of the bison as a figure of rhetorical colonialism when forming community, selling products, and building the nation’s symbolic profile. Ultimately, I will show how even though today’s invocations of the synecdochal bison may look harmless, the symbol of the bison has never ceased to function as the rhetorical means for settler institutions to facilitate and justify their control of dispossessed lands, including the Indigenous peoples and bison who reside on it.


Abstract: Plant-based diets are often perceived as being antithetical to Indigenous interests in what is today colonially known as Canada. This perceived antithesis hinges on veganism’s rejection of the consumption of animals. This apparent antithesis, however, is a misperception that a reframing of ethical veganism can help correct. This article argues that veganism’s objection to dairy should be underscored as a central concern of ethical veganism. Such emphasis not only brings into view the substantial alignment between plant-based diets and Indigenous worldviews, but also highlights the related goals of decolonization and reconciliation in Canada. Veganism, in reality, rejects a practice (dairy farming) that was constitutive of settler colonialism in North America and which still promotes colonial familial ideologies while constructing Indigenous peoples and other non-Europeans (who disproportionately cannot tolerate lactose) as abnormal. Veganism – along with vegetarianism – shares the general respect for animals and interspecies relations (along with a concomitant disavowal of human exceptionalism) that many Indigenous legal orders in Canada promote. Yet, despite this shared disavowal of a principal colonial ideology, the tight correlation between hunting and Indigeneity on the one hand, and veganism and vegetarianism and an objection to killing animals on the other, makes veganism’s contributions to decolonization and reconciliation difficult to see. By framing veganism as a critique of the dairy industry, however, the associations that veganism has with decolonizing ends are not clouded by these overpowering correlations, helping to bring into view even vegetarianism’s contributions toward these ends.