Abstract: Jennifer Lackey has recently argued that victims of gross injustices and epistemic harms not only have a right to know, but also a right to be known, i.e., to share and have their experiences heard. This right is associated with a duty to provide epistemic reparations, notably in bearing witness to victims. The epistemic harms with which Lackey is concerned are features of settler colonialism that call for such epistemic reparations. I seek to raise caution about the pursuit of epistemic reparations, however, especially through bearing witness and testimony, in settler colonial contexts. I argue that settler colonial epistemic environments constitute morasses of unknowing, where settlers are subjectified in ways that severely burden their capacity to properly understand and know victims of epistemic harms. In settler colonial contexts, I argue, epistemic reparations through bearing witness and testimonies risk being both unproductive and pernicious. They risk being unproductive precisely because victims are at risk of not being properly understood without transforming the material and subjective features of the settler colonial epistemic environment. They further risk being pernicious given settler colonial dynamics that tend to defuse the critical potential of testimonies. To ensure a more thorough pursuit of the right to be known, we must therefore also consider the required decolonial transformation of the structures and subjectivities that make epistemic harm possible.






Access the chapter here.



Abstract: This study critically examines transportation planning in the West Bank, revealing how it serves as a colonial mechanism of control and segregation, rather than a facilitator of urban growth and connectivity. Unlike cities that thrive as “living organisms” through integrated networks of roads and services, Palestinian territories are subjected to a meticulously crafted spatiotemporal colonialism through fragmentation, where movement is restricted, resources are unevenly distributed, and communities are deliberately isolated. Through an analysis of historical context, policies, zoning, and infrastructure prioritization, this study exposes the use of transportation planning as a tool to entrench colonial power, limit Palestinian self-determination, and erode the socioeconomic foundations of urban life. The findings underscore that transportation planning in the West Bank is not merely a logistical concern but a deliberate colonial strategy to reconfigure urban landscapes, control populations, and restrict Palestinian access to their own land. The study shows that the Israeli colonial power systematically strips away the quality of Palestinian life through relentless control over time and movement, turning checkpoints into sites where not only freedom but lives themselves are taken. Palestinian identity, however, extends beyond the human realm, woven into the land, water, and ecology—an enduring presence that resists erasure through its deep connection to place.


Abstract: The ongoing Israeli genocide in Gaza has resulted in the widespread killing of innocent civilians, along with the destruction of homes, universities, and critical infrastructure—deepening a humanitarian catastrophe that reflects a broader settler colonial agenda. This study investigates the deliberate strategies of forced displacement engineered by Israel in Gaza, and the corresponding practices of Palestinian sumūd (steadfastness) as forms of resistance. Situated within Settler Colonial Theory by (Patrick Wolfe, 1999), the research critically examines how Israeli military, legal, political, and media tactics function as mechanisms of population transfer and ethnic cleansing aimed at permanent demographic transformation. Drawing on thematic analysis of official Israeli government and military statements, reports from international organizations and media related to Forced Displacement, alongside thirty semi-structured interviews with Palestinians from diverse backgrounds, the study reveals the systematic nature of displacement and the resilience it engenders. Findings demonstrate that forced displacement in Gaza is not merely a wartime consequence but a central strategy of settler-colonial domination, with repeated displacements fracturing Palestinian social fabric and exhausting resistance. Palestinians’ refusal to comply with Israeli evacuation orders and their persistent rebuilding efforts embody sumūd, a powerful grassroots counter-strategy that transforms survival into political resistance. This steadfastness challenges settler-colonial attempts at erasure and asserts an enduring claim to land, identity, and futurity. The study underscores that while sumūd represents essential resilience, it must be supported by international legal accountability and global solidarity to effectively counter the machinery of ethnic cleansing. This research contributes critical insights to settler colonial studies, human rights discourse, and Palestinian resistance narratives, illuminating the urgent need for integrated approaches to halt ongoing displacement and uphold Palestinian rights.