« Older posts
Newer posts »

‘Fourth’ (indigenous) cinema is not ‘first’ (settler) cinema: Joanna Hearne, ‘Native to the Device: Thoughts on Digital Indigenous Studies’, Studies in American Indian Literatures, 29, 1, 2017, pp. 3-26

30May17

Excerpt: In studies of Indigenous film and video, the camera has been a powerful metaphor for Indigenous struggles over control of the image. This is articulated most vividly in Māori filmmaker Barry Barclay’s invocation of the camera’s contrapuntal position, embedded in the mechanics of shot / reverse shot, to characterize Indigenous and settler filmmaking in his seminal essay “Celebrating Fourth Cinema.” He imagines the settler perspective—“First Cinema”—represented by “the camera of the ship’s deck,” while an Indigenous perspective—“Fourth Cinema”—arises from the “camera ashore” (8–9). Barclay visualizes this staged encounter, from ship to shore, in terms of lines of sight—the eyeline match edit—and the politics of conquest. It is a metaphor with geographic specificity (in Aotearoa) that is also global, connecting lands, peoples, and representation through the articulated positionalities of encounter. Barclay applies it broadly, asserting that Fourth Cinema exists “outside the national orthodoxy” altogether while tracing the transnational heritage of dominant film storytelling to the originary scene of settler colonialism (9). He illustrates the camera of the ship’s deck with examples from the film Mutiny on the Bounty. To show the global relevance of his vision of the camera ashore, we might take up the example of Abenaki director Alanis Obomsawin’s 2002 documentary Is the Crown at War with Us?, in which we see home videos of Mi’gmaq tribal members’ confrontation with the Canadian federal fishery office over fishing rights in Miramichi Bay. From the shore, Mi’gmaq cameras capture evidence of Department of Fisheries and Oceans’ boats violently running over the much smaller boats of the Mi’gmaq fishers of Burnt Church, New Brunswick.


Filed under: Uncategorized   |  Closed

Indefinite detention is settler colonialism: Harry Blagg, Tamara Tulich, Zoe Bush, ‘Indefinite Detention Meets Colonial Dispossession Indigenous Youths With Foetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders in a White Settler Justice System’, Social & Legal Studies, 2017

30May17

Abstract: Foetal alcohol spectrum disorder (FASD) is a non-diagnostic umbrella term encompassing a spectrum of disorders caused by prenatal alcohol exposure. This article reports on a qualitative research project undertaken in three Indigenous communities in the West Kimberley region of Western Australia, intended to develop diversionary pathways for Indigenous young people with FASD at risk of enmeshment in the justice system. Rates of FASD in some parts of the West Kimberley are comparable to the highest identified internationally. A diagnosis of FASD amplifies the chances of Indigenous youth being caught up in the justice system in Western Australia, including indefinite detention in prison if found unfit to stand trial. A fresh diversionary paradigm is required. Employing a postcolonial perspective, we explore issues surrounding law and justice intervention – and non-intervention – in the lives of Indigenous children and their families. The FASD problem cannot be uncoupled from the history of colonial settlement and the multiple traumas resulting from dispossession, nor can solving the problem be isolated from the broader task of decolonizing relationships between Indigenous people and the settler mainstream. The decolonizing process involves expanding the role of Indigenous owned and place-based processes and services embedded in Indigenous knowledge.


Filed under: Uncategorized   |  Closed

Numbers as a settler colonial story: Pekka Pitkänen, A Commentary on Numbers Narrative, Ritual, and Colonialism, Routledge, 2017

30May17

Description: This book provides a new reading of the biblical book of Numbers in a commentary form. Mainstream readings have tended to see the book as a haphazard junkyard of material that connects Genesis–Leviticus with Deuteronomy (and Joshua), composed at a late stage in the history of ancient Israel. By contrast, this book reads Numbers as part of a wider work of Genesis–Joshua, a carefully crafted programmatic settler colonial document for a new society in Canaanite highlands in the late second millennium BCE that seeks to replace pre-existing indigenous societies. In the context of the tremendous influence that the biblical documents have had on the world in the last 2,000–3,000 years, the book also offers pointers towards reading these texts today. This volume is a fascinating study of this text, and will be of interest not only to biblical scholars, but to anyone with an interest in the history of the ancient Levant, and colonisation and colonialism in the ancient world more broadly.


Filed under: Uncategorized   |  Closed

Lorenzo Veracini in Conversation with Magid Shihade: ‘The Settler Colonial Present’, Monday, June 5th, 5:00 – 7:00 (hosted by the Centre for Palestine Studies and the London Middle East Institute)

27May17

Location: SWLT (Senate House, Paul Webley Wing), SOAS, University of London


Filed under: Uncategorized   |  Closed

Indigenous law is law: Stephen Muecke, ‘Earthbound Law: The Force of an Indigenous Australian Institution’, Law and Critique, 2017

27May17

Abstract: Australian Native Title law is critiqued in three moves: 1. Analysing the kinds of knowledge used in Australian Native Title law to make cases for Indigenous land tenure; 2. Analysing how a Nyikina elder narrates a legal matter of concern from his point of view; 3. Speculating about how an Indigenous ‘legal’ institution called the bugarrigarra was mobilised to resist extraction colonialism. These are all experimental moves in that they are partially composed around matters of concern, rather than displaying matters of fact. They are experiments that stage a learning process as they describe (that is, write about in order to add reality to) a number of different events.


Filed under: Uncategorized   |  Closed

A settler colonial story, the settler colonial story: Dustin Michael Naegle, ‘Go Up (Again) to Jerusalem in Judah’: The Settler Colonial Mythology of ‘Return’ and ‘Restoration’ in Ezra 1-6, MA Dissertation, Brite Divinity School, 2017

27May17

Excerpt: Within Ezra 1–6 (E1-6) resides a story, a narrative of related events, ostensibly in historical sequence. While this may sound simple enough—so much so that many have assumed that the story/narrative in E1-6 is synonymous with the actual events of the past—postmodern scholarship has argued convincingly that narratives are far from simple. Rather than an objective account, the narrative in E1-6 reflects what Foucault described as “discourse,” a particular set of ideas, beliefs, practices, and biases—an ideology—that conditions how an author constructs the subjects and the world of the narrative. E1-6 is a story driven by a view of the world whose purpose is to draw the reader/hearer into this particular ideology. E1-6 is one particular representation of certain events told in hopes of persuading people that this “history” is real history, and that it is theirs. There is, in other words, a mythic quality to this historicizing discourse. 

This current study is an attempt to explain part of the discourse embedded in E1-6 by utilizing the theoretical framework found in settler colonial studies, a relatively new field that attempts to understand and explain how settler societies function differently than, but also within the context of a larger colonial enterprise.


Filed under: Uncategorized   |  Closed

Recognition is not sovereignty: Michael Gordon, ‘Indigenous summit rejects ‘minimalist’ recognition, pushes for treaty and voice in constitution’ Sydney Morning Herald, 26/05/17

27May17

Excerpt: In a stunning repudiation [of current proposals], the convention rejected acknowledging Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people in the constitution, instead backing the Indigenous voice. It also called for a road map to a treaty.

It has called for a “Makarrata Commission” to supervise agreements between Indigenous groups and government and a period of truth-telling about the treatment of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people.


Filed under: Uncategorized   |  Closed

Indians in the family makes indigenising settlers: Dawn Peterson, Indians in the Family: Adoption and the Politics of Antebellum Expansion, Harvard University Press, 2017

26May17

Description: During his invasion of Creek Indian territory in 1813, future U.S. president Andrew Jackson discovered a Creek infant orphaned by his troops. Moved by an “unusual sympathy,” Jackson sent the child to be adopted into his Tennessee plantation household. Through the stories of nearly a dozen white adopters, adopted Indian children, and their Native parents, Dawn Peterson opens a window onto the forgotten history of adoption in early nineteenth-century America. Indians in the Family shows the important role that adoption played in efforts to subdue Native peoples in the name of nation-building.

As the United States aggressively expanded into Indian territories between 1790 and 1830, government officials stressed the importance of assimilating Native peoples into what they styled the United States’ “national family.” White households who adopted Indians—especially slaveholding Southern planters influenced by leaders such as Jackson—saw themselves as part of this expansionist project. They hoped to inculcate in their young charges U.S. attitudes toward private property, patriarchal family, and racial hierarchy.

U.S. whites were not the only ones driving this process. Choctaw, Creek, and Chickasaw families sought to place their sons in white households, to be educated in the ways of U.S. governance and political economy. But there were unintended consequences for all concerned. As adults, these adopted Indians used their educations to thwart U.S. federal claims to their homelands, setting the stage for the political struggles that would culminate in the Indian Removal Act of 1830.


Filed under: Uncategorized   |  Closed

Black and settler or black and indigenous? George J. Sefa Dei, ‘Blackness and Colonial Settlerhood: A Purposeful Provocation’, in George J. Sefa Dei, Reframing Blackness and Black Solidarities through Anti-colonial and Decolonial Prisms, Springer, 2017, pp. 81-117

26May17

Abstract: This chapter seeks to clarify and simultaneously trouble several key concepts that inform or have been assumed through the popular call to “decolonize anti-racism.” For example, Lawrence and Dua’s (2005) thought-provoking article Decolonizing Antiracism. These concepts include Euro-colonialism and settler colonialism; settlerhood and settler White colonial discourse and settler colonialism; complicity and implication; and responsibility. My argument is that neither I, nor any other Black/African residing on Turtle Island, can be referred as a settler, and charged with complicity as Lawrence and Dua (2005) long ago claimed. Instead, the chapter provides new coordinates for collective and global mobilization by troubling the politics of “decolonizing solidarity” as the intellectual flavor of the moment. This is done by offering Indigeneity as an international category and as a coordinate for decolonizing (and) antiracist work. Ideas put forward in the chapter are aided by many who add complexity and nuance to decolonizing (and) anti-racist scholarship and praxis. It is opined that theorizing the Indigenous as an international category allows us to mobilize as an international category and as an international collective of multiple anti-racist communities that can build solidarities with Indigenous Peoples and their decolonizing work. Indigeneity provides a category, and a collective, that can mobilize support for decolonizing work that reaches Indigenous Peoples across the world.


Filed under: Uncategorized   |  Closed

Trumpism as settler colonialism? Leigh Patel, ‘Trump and Settler Colonialism’, CTheory, 2017

23May17

Excerpt: Trump’s popularity can be apprehended through the lens of settler colonialism, which relies on various technologies, including racism and heteropatriarchy, to accomplish its aims.


Filed under: Uncategorized   |  Closed
« Older posts
Newer posts »