Abstract: This essay elaborates how a Deleuzian mind conceives the becoming of history in terms of ‘end’ or ‘exit’. A novel focus on ‘exiting’ from histories of colonialism offers an important paradigm shift away from the prevailing models of ‘post-colonial reconciliation’ and ‘de-colonisation’ that provide the concepts and language most often used for thinking about transforming colonialism. Such models have a limited application in settler-colonial nations, where the colonial imposition on Indigenous peoples is not in any way ‘post’, but rather is ongoing. Here, I articulate the idea of a discontinuous process of ‘exit-from-colonisation’ – or ‘ex-colonialism’ – that builds from Deleuzian understandings of temporality, existence, politics and philosophical activity. I argue that ‘ex-colonialism’ addresses three key problems in settler-colonisation: the need to disrupt historical progression from a troubled origin; the issue of co-constitution in contexts where unhappy relationships prevail; and the systemic or structural nature of the reforms required to accommodate political and legal pluralism in jurisdictions characterised by a post-colonial imposition of legal, political and cultural uniformity in the form of the settler-colonial nation-state. We will see how Deleuzian concepts for ex-colonialism align with First Nations’ aspirations for self-determination and release a line of flight from colonial power formations, distinct from – and resistant to – continuous (post-)colonialism.



Description: Marketing the Wilderness analyzes the relationship between the outdoor recreation industry, public lands in the United States, and Indigenous sovereignty and representation in recreational spaces. Combining social media analysis, digital ethnography, and historical research, Joseph Whitson offers nuanced insights into more than a century of the outdoor recreation industry’s marketing strategies, unraveling its complicity in settler colonialism. Complicating the narrative of outdoor recreation as a universal good, Whitson introduces the concept of “wildernessing” to describe the physical, legal, and rhetorical production of pristine, empty lands that undergirds the outdoor recreation industry, a process that further disenfranchises Indigenous people from whom these lands were stolen. He demonstrates how companies such as Patagonia and REI align with the mining and drilling industries in their need to remove Indigenous peoples and histories from valuable lands. And he describes the ways Indigenous and decolonial activists are subverting and resisting corporate marketing strategies to introduce new narratives of place. Through the lens of environmental justice activism, Marketing the Wilderness reconsiders the ethics of recreational land use, advocating for engagement with issues of cultural representation and appropriation informed by Indigenous perspectives. As he discusses contemporary public land advocacy around places such as Bears Ears National Monument, Whitson focuses on the deeply fraught relationship between the outdoor recreation industry and Indigenous communities. Emphasizing the power of the corporate system and its treatment of land as a commodity under capitalism, he shows how these tensions shape the American idea of “wilderness” and what it means to fight for its preservation.





Abstract: Terraforming has long been one of the most popular concepts in SF and space colonization discourses to think about the necessary territorial changes on other planets to make them livable for human life. More recently, however, terraforming has made the journey from alien environments back to Earth to reflect on how colonialist-capitalist practices have already changed the planet. Anne Stewart conceptualizes the histories and futures of these practices with the term ‘colonial terraforming’ – a praxis which describes the transformation of places to make them habitable only for a particular set of people: European colonial settlers. Thus, terraforming not only changes the land but also can be read as an ontological practices that creates the “ecological genre of the human,” as Derek Woods puts it in conversation with Sylvia Wynter. When land provides the “ontological framework for understanding relationships,” as Glen Coulthard frames it in Red Skin, White Masks, what does it mean for Indigenous onto-epistemologies when the ground is shifting, dispossessed, terraformed? This essay critically engages with this question: translating Coulthard and Leanne Simpson’s concept of “place-based solidarity” to a “planet-based solidarity,” I read Indigenous futurist texts as decolonial practices of relating to the land, planets, and the cosmos. After a theoretical engagement with terraforming and its entanglements within current speculative projects of colonizing Mars and dominant narratives of astrocapitalism, I read three short stories that are set against and beyond the extractive logics of colonial modernity: Adam Garnet Jones’s “History of the New World,” jaye simpson’s “The Ark of the Turtle’s Back” (both published in Love After the End, ed. Joshua Whitehead) and Celu Amberstone’s “Refugees” (first published in So Long Been Dreaming, ed. Nalo Hopkinson). Each of these stories is set in a different moment of extraterrestrial exodus: while still on Earth, during the journey in space, and after arrival on an alien planet. Through their speculative interventions in discourses of climate disaster, colonialism, and the ongoing dispossession of Indigenous peoples, I argue that these Indigenous futurist narratives imagine a different cosmic order, marked by a generative refusal of the available scripts of relating to the galaxy.