Abstract: This thesis explores how the embodied everyday experience of living in a militarised, settler-colonial context can be understood through exercise practices, and how the effects of living in such a context may be navigated through exercise. It explores this objective through interviews with six Palestinians who exercise and participate in the Right to Movement community in Bethlehem, to understand their lived, everyday experiences. Using a Feminist Peace Research methodology and applying reflexive thematic analysis to the interview data, this research finds that exercising as an everyday practice gains value beyond the ordinary when carried out in this extraordinary setting. Furthermore, this thesis engages with decolonial feminist ideas to argue why lived, everyday experiences of war and violence matter and proposes ways to challenge and transform the existing Western-dominated systems and structures that sustain violence and suppression. The analysis concludes that exercising in this setting is a complex, multilayered, powerful practice of agency and control. Their experiences reveal that exercising operates between the everyday and the extraordinary, highlighting its flexibility and how its significance and symbolic value vary according to the socio-political and specific spatio-temporal settings in which it is practised. As the participants insist on preserving and caring for their bodies, as well as displaying Palestinian identity through their exercise practices, it is used as a creative mode of expression and transformation. Despite the occupation, exercising helps them achieve a sense of freedom, altering feelings of worry and anger into joy and empowerment. This demonstrates the powerful role of exercise as a means of taking control of one’s body and agency regarding how they encounter the militarised, settler-colonial context they live in. Furthermore, the Right to Movement community utilises exercise to take control of and change the narrative, to tell a different story. This thesis argues that we need such stories to understand war and violence as corporeal, lived experiences, and that these experiences should be at the centre of how we analyse, discuss, and formulate foreign policy on war and conflicts. However, this fundamental change requires not just a change of approach but a shift in paradigm and a radical change in how we understand our interconnectedness and responsibility toward one another. I argue that decolonial feminist ideas of collective responsibility, ethics of care, and solidarity are needed to make this shift and break the ongoing cycle of violence.




Excerpt: The traditional story of the Adventus Saxonum, or the arrival of the Germanic-speaking populations in Britain, is one of invasion, genocidal violence and conquest. Following the withdrawal of the Roman troops in the fifth century, Germanic tribes washed up on the southern and eastern shores of the island and proceeded to plunder their way inland, forcing the native Britons to the northern and western frontiers, into areas which were to become Wales, Cornwall, Cumbria, and Southern Scotland. This characterization of the events is heavily influenced by De Excidio et Conquestu Britanniae, a sermon written by the sixth-century British monk Gildas, who depicted the coming of the Germanic-speakers as a harrowing time in which any Britons who remained in the occupied regions were massacred or reduced to servitude. Archaeologists, however, came to doubt this view, partly as a result of an anti-migrationist trend in the field that sought to decouple material culture from tribal identities, and instead emphasized that artifacts could be spread through peaceful or semi-peaceful diffusion, rather than violent invasions and migrations. Through this lens, it was argued that a relatively small elite of male Germanic warriors had arrived in Britain, and their cultural and political dominance resulted in the bulk of the pre-existing population, which remained in place, adopting Anglo-Saxon culture until they began to conceive of themselves as English, rather than British. Though it originated in archaeological circles, this “elite dominance” model eventually came to be endorsed by historians such as Wood (2010). English historical linguists have tended to have difficulties accepting the viewpoint that the spread of Germanic languages in Britain was merely the result of an elite dominance scenario. Old English, which emerged by the seventh century from contact between the various Germanic dialects brought to Britain, contains very little obvious influence from the Celtic languages, and toponymic evidence suggests an almost total replacement of Celtic and Latin place names with Germanic ones during the transition between late antiquity and the early medieval period. Celticists, on the other hand, have seized upon the acculturation model, and have pushed back against the notion that Old English is devoid of Celtic influence. While the number of English words derived from British Celtic is widely accepted to be extremely small, it has been suggested that various English grammatical features bear the mark of a Celtic substrate, but only manifested themselves in writing once the Norman Conquest had extinguished the dominance of the West Saxon literary form, which had supposedly preserved a conservative and more purely Germanic structure than the Celtic-influenced dialects spoken by the commoners. This idea has become known as the “Celtic hypothesis.” In this paper, I will begin by deconstructing the Celtic hypothesis on linguistic grounds. I will then investigate the Adventus Saxonum utilizing archaeological, toponymic, and above all recently-published archaeogenetic data, in order to argue that the evidence in favor of a model of settler colonization via mass migration, rather than elite dominance, is insurmountable in the south and east of Britain. Following this, using theories of language contact and creolization, and analyzing analogous scenarios for which there is more historical evidence, I will explain why Celtic was unable to strongly affect early insular Germanic, despite the fact that some Britons did in fact live alongside the settlers and even started families with them. To conclude, I will examine the reasons for why the linguistic fates of Britain and Gaul differed from one another so drastically, despite the fact that both places experienced colonization by Latin-speakers and Germanic-speakers.


Abstract: This research addresses how societies use heritage and the commemoration of past violence to the ruination and domination of Others. It examines cultural memory as integral to the settler-colonial desire for land and logic of elimination, and its findings offer a corrective to scholarship that views memory and destruction as ontologically distinct. They lead me to argue that commemorating loss imagines a past that is recoverable in the present and provides the administrative tools of heritage-making to construct sites of memory by displacing and dispossessing present-day communities—a process I term heritage colonialism. The research involved nearly five years of photo-ethnographic fieldwork at the City of David National Park, located in the heart of the Palestinian neighborhood of Silwan in East Jerusalem. Using data gathered over dozens of tours, over fifty interviews, photography, and endless hours of observation, I trace two key transformations. The transformation of the archaeological excavation of the city’s multicultural origins into a highly popular tourist attraction centered exclusively on cycles of destruction, exile, and triumphant return to Jerusalem by its Jewish inhabitants. At the same time, I trace how Jewish settlers have utilized the development of tourism, heritage, and archaeology at the City of David to capture a substantial portion of the lands and homes in Silwan, resulting in the ruination of its Palestinian community. Examining these twin destructions, I demonstrate that the construction of Jewish heritage is not merely a guise for a colonial project, nor a form of erasure or denial of its violence. Rather, I find that constructing the memory of the ancient past at the national park is integral to territorial expansion and colonial domination in several ways. Cultural memory envisions and produces an affective and intimate attachment to the ancient Jewish past while devaluing Palestinian life in the present. Israeli authorities have also utilized heritage development as a bureaucratic tool to slowly clear Silwan of its Palestinian houses and residents and to unearth the ancient City of David from beneath the surface. Yet, the valorization of the Jewish past does not conceal or obscure the violence. Instead, it has provided a way to live with it comfortably and has framed it as necessary to protect the past. Building on these findings, I argue that the ethnonationalist and territorial relationship between memory and destruction observed in the City of David has profoundly shaped Israeli memory culture and created the conditions for the increase in land seizure and settler violence we observe today across East Jerusalem and the West Bank, as well as the upstream precondition for ethnic cleansing.






Abstract: Accurate diagnosis is essential for accessing emerging gene-targeted treatments for inherited retinal diseases (IRDs), but many minoritised communities face additional barriers to diagnosis. This scoping review synthesised clinical studies on the prevalence and diagnosis of IRDs among Indigenous Peoples worldwide. Medline, Embase, Global Health, Informit and CINAHL were searched on December 4, 2023. We included articles reporting Indigenous Peoples with IRDs from all global regions. Published between 1974 and 2023, 73 studies (581 cases) of IRDs in Indigenous Peoples from 24 countries were included, mostly reporting participants Indigenous to the Middle East (34%), Oceania (27%) and North America (23%). Studies of specific IRD cases showed geographical or cultural group associations, such as rod-cone dystrophy among the Diné (Navajo Nation) or Bardet-Biedl syndrome in Bedouin populations of the Middle East. With dedicated programs, population-specific IRD gene variants in the Middle Eastern Bedouin populations, New Zealand Māori and other Pacific peoples are the most well-characterised, and this has enabled improved diagnostic approaches. There is limited knowledge of the relative prevalence and support needs for IRDs among most other global Indigenous groups. Engagement, co-designed approaches and collective efforts, including raising awareness, may address challenges limiting equitable access to IRD diagnosis for Indigenous Peoples, facilitating access to emerging treatments.