Abstract: The figure of the “Indian” upholds and perpetuates U.S. settler colonialism in ways not confined within U.S. borders. Instead, fascination with “Indians” has been a global phenomenon that can help us better understand the movement of settler colonial ideologies. Regarding the specific relationship between the “Indian” and Germany, scholars have argued that the fascination and love for all things “Indian”, or German Indianthusiasm, allows Germans to situate themselves alongside the victims of history rather than perpetrators specifically in regard to the Holocaust (Hartmut Lutz 2006). However, little attention has been given to how German Indianthusiasm connects with German settler colonialism in German South West Africa (DSWA). “German Indianthusiasm and Settler Colonialism: Pernicious Continuities” situates U.S. settler colonialism and German settler colonialism in DSWA as constitutive of a transnational settler colonial project, rather than distinct nationalist endeavors. Whereas representations of “Indians” in Wild West shows, Völkerschauen, and colonial exhibitions enabled Germany to position itself as a colonial power alongside other European nations during the German colonial period, contemporary iterations of Indianthusiasm allow German audiences to ignore their history of settler colonialism in DSWA and deflect responsibility for addressing this history. Exposing the simultaneity of “Indian” and “African” displays with the German colonial project in DSWA, and contemporary Wild West spaces juxtaposed by efforts to address Germany’s colonial legacy, this project tracks the pernicious continuities of colonial logics across geographic space and time. I suggest that Indianthusiasm allows a guilt-free realm to talk about decolonization, solidarity, and cross-cultural sharing with “Indians” without foundationally challenging the settler colonial ideologies inherent in the figure. For Germans to truly address their colonial heritage, and to make concerted efforts to address the representation of “Indians” in Germany, there must be an acknowledgement of how such ideologies are connected and persist over time.


Abstract: While significant scholarly attention has focused on the Israeli state’s efforts to control Palestinian intimate lives, a notable gap remains regarding the legal mechanisms, particularly the fragmented legal systems impacting Palestinian women in marriages involving holders of different identity cards in East Jerusalem and the broader political and ideological objectives of Israeli settler-colonialism. Accordingly, this study bridges the gap by investigating the enforcement of Sharia court judgements in these marriages, highlighting how such legal processes expose Palestinian women to the Israeli settler colonial project. It argues that mechanisms for executing Sharia court rulings – primarily concerning alimony and custody – establish five distinct relationships: (1) between J1 Jerusalemite women and Israeli authorities; (2) between J1 Jerusalemite women and the Palestinian Authority; (3) between J2 Jerusalemite/West Bank women and the Palestinian Authority; (4) between J2 Jerusalemite/West Bank women and Israeli authorities; and (5) between J1 and J2 Jerusalemite/West Bank women. The study asserts that these relationships regulate Palestinian women’s intimate lives and gendered roles, contributing to patterns of Israelization and Judaization, undermining Palestinian statehood, and fostering apartheid-like conditions among Palestinians of similar racial and cultural backgrounds. These dynamics fragment the Palestinian social fabric, advancing the elimination of Palestinians and the dominance of Jews.


Abstract: The history of South Africa is publicly commemorated as a process of dispossession of people from the land, massacres and cultural and linguistic attempted erasures. This public commemoration hardly recognises intimate geographies of settler colonialism in which Black women’s wombs were subjected to violent reproductive health technologies which had the intention of reducing Black fertility. This chapter asks how did the ontology of the ‘swart gevaar’, which is the fear of White people being swamped by Black people, institutionalised by settler colonial administrators and the apartheid government managed to wage war on Black women’s wombs. Inequalities of reproductive healthcare system in this post-apartheid moment are examined, and how they continue to send Black women to shallow graves. This chapter also reflects on ways in which Black women resisted settler colonial reproductive violence and developed their own reproductive health agencies, intimate freedoms and maintained indigenous reproductive health systems. It proposes that decolonial feminist project in South Africa should begin by exhuming Black women’s bodies from shallow of settler colonial reproductive violence and publicly commemorate them as radical sites of liberties, desires, names, songs, resistance, community and human dignity. Decolonising women’s wombs in South Africa will also require birthing new cultures of intimacy, building new homes of agency, reproductive liberties and dignified reproductive health services.