Abstract: ‘New worlds’ and new beginnings populate the dreams of both innovation and settler colonialism. In this dissertation I examine how innovation economy is made in entanglement with settler colonial expansions and struggles. The thesis takes place in ‘Silicon Palestine’: the shifting frontiers of technological innovation and risk capital that bring Israel, the occupied Palestinian territories, and spaces like San Francisco and Dubai into interplay. ‘Innovation’ appears in this dissertation not as a universal economic form but as a site of political struggle and creativity. Innovation is a gathering of heterogenous and contradictory forces, actors and imaginaries in which the purity of settler colonialism and capitalism is lost. The conceptual framework of the thesis bridges settler colonial and relational theory. Through the perspective of ‘entanglements’ — a relation that is not determined but inherently dynamic and heterogenous — I examine the relations between settler colonialism and innovation economy through four analytical lenses: political myth, temporality, spatiality, and embodiments. The research material is collected through an explorative and ethnographic research design between 2019 and 2023, during a total of 13 months of fieldwork in the urban spaces of innovation. Most data come from the Palestinian occupied territories: Ramallah, Rawabi, and East Jerusalem – but also from places such as Tel Aviv/Jaffa and San Francisco. Key materials include 140 interviews with Israeli and Palestinian innovation elites, photographs and fieldnotes from innovation hubs, and popular innovation literature. The empirical chapters interrogate the entanglements of innovation and settler colonialism in their various constellations ranging from histories to political myths, from urbanities to practices of tech-outsourcing, and from peace- to genocidal war-making. The work contributes to discussions on the relationships between settler colonialism and global capitalism, the critical analyses of innovation, and the global approaches on Palestine/Israel. Two key arguments are central to the work. First, Silicon Palestine shows that the settler colonial state plays a defining role in the global constitution of innovation economy. The study decenters both the neoliberal and the techno-universalist notions of violence to make space for a more colonially informed reading. Second, Silicon Palestine productively destabilises both the categories of ‘innovation’ and ‘settler colonialism’ by departing from the unidirectional dramas of capitalist expansion and the contained geographies and binaries of settler colonialism. Rather than a periphery or a passive object of capitalist and settler colonial expansion, Palestine emerges as a crucial site of global theory. Silicon Palestine shows power in its violence and in its irresolvable heterogeneity and fragility.


Excerpt: Late in the summer of 2024, one of the authors of this introduction (EM) boarded a bus from the neighborhood of Bat Galim to Hadar HaCarmel in Haifa. Sitting across from her was an elderly Jewish woman who, clearly seeking conversation, began complaining about changes to the bus’s schedule, her neighborhood, and the city in general. “It’s all Arabs here now,” she said without reservation, “we always lived with them. I grew up with the Arabs who live by Saint George’s church, but now . . . now they are everywhere.” She linked Palestinian growing presence to the loss of the city’s Jewish character, pointing to loud music played on Shabbat and disregard for Yom Kippur observances. It was nighttime. The bus climbed through old Stanton Road, now called Shivat Tsion (literally: Zion’s Return). The road was built during the British Mandate to connect Palestinian downtown with the Jewish settlement up the mountain. “Look!” the woman gestured out the window, “Here was the mayor’s house, and we lived down there.” The mayor’s house belonged to Abed Al-Rahman Al Haj, Palestinian mayor of Haifa between 1920 and 1929. Today, it is one of the only remaining structures of Palestinian Wadi Salib and was recently sold to Jewish speculators. “You know, Arabs bought all the houses up here, and even in the Carmel,” the woman continued. “This is dangerous since, you know, Haifa used to be Arab”. This brief encounter, mundane as it is unsettling, highlights significant changes unfolding in Haifa over recent decades. A historically diverse city, from which almost all of the Palestinian population was expelled in 1948 (Manna 2022; Morris 2004), Haifa is slowly regaining a prominent Palestinian presence. This is evident in the growing number of Palestinian residents in many of the city’s neighborhoods, in the growing power of Palestinian capital in processes of urban development, and, perhaps most importantly, in growing Palestinian claims on urban space, history, and identity. For the Jewish woman cited earlier, these changes appear threatening, as they upend longstanding power dynamics between ethnonational collectives. What worries her, it seems, is less the mere fact of having Palestinian neighbors, and more the changing relations between rulers and ruled, “homeowners” and “guests,” or, indeed, between settlers and natives. Hence, her assessment that “Arabs bought all the houses here,” which, if not entirely false, is certainly exaggerated, and hence her concerns about the growing influence of Palestinians over the city’s public character. Yet, what is particularly troubling to her is how contemporary changes conjure up historical specters, as they recover a city that “used to be Arab” before the ethnic cleansing of 1948. She clearly identifies Palestinian life in Haifa with a kind of collective return, a prospect she views as dangerous and tangible. Perhaps this is because she, like many others raised on colonial dread, fears that the Palestinians will do to the Zionists what they did to them.



Abstract: Urban environments worldwide are dynamic spaces symbolising progress and innovation. However, these sites of human significance are also commonly steeped in rich histories of genocide, displacement, and dispossession of Indigenous populations. Contemporary settler-colonial cities not only occupy Indigenous lands but effectively alienate the notion of Indigeneity that inherently exists within them. Aotearoa New Zealand cities are no exception. In Aotearoa, cities continue to reinforce colonial narratives through the fragmentation, dilution, and exclusion of Indigenous Māori geographies and identities (Puketapu-Dentice et al., 2017). Colonialism and urbanisation in Aotearoa have engendered the atrophy of everyday Māori traditions, practices, and social structures, resulting in disproportionately negative health, education, and economic impacts (Ryks et al., 2014). Urban spaces profoundly impact the identity and experiences of the people occupying them. In Aotearoa, New Zealand, our urban milieu might reasonably be expected to reflect the Treaty-based biculturalism shared between New Zealand Māori and non-Māori cultures. However, urban spaces, alongside policy and decision-making, continue to deliver a one-sided Western narrative that does not reflect the diversity in the nation (Akena, 2012). This research critiques such Western oversight within settler-colonial cities. It does so by exploring the experiences of New Zealand Māori young people, both those living within and beyond their tribal territories, in two urban locations: Ōtepoti (Dunedin) and Tūranga (Gisborne). These small cities offer unique case studies distinct from larger urban areas. Focusing on the smaller urban centres, the research articulates potential opportunities and insights to inform more inclusive and equitable approaches to urban planning in a settler-colonial context on the periphery. In addition, exploring how Māori young people perceive and encounter their respective urban environments provides insights into identity and sense of belonging for Indigenous citizens. This investigation contributes to a nuanced understanding of Indigenous experiences within place and how place attributes can be conducive to facilitating aspects of identity and contemporary placemaking. A Kaupapa Māori methodology (Smith, 2012) has been used to ensure that the research, from its inception to its dissemination, is firmly grounded in Māori philosophy, epistemology, and ontology. Upholding a Kaupapa Māori perspective provides an avenue to mainstream Indigenous knowledge and aspirations alongside Western-based research while also ensuring that the study is conducted by Māori, with Māori, and for the potential benefit of Māori.




Abstract: The figure of the “Indian” upholds and perpetuates U.S. settler colonialism in ways not confined within U.S. borders. Instead, fascination with “Indians” has been a global phenomenon that can help us better understand the movement of settler colonial ideologies. Regarding the specific relationship between the “Indian” and Germany, scholars have argued that the fascination and love for all things “Indian”, or German Indianthusiasm, allows Germans to situate themselves alongside the victims of history rather than perpetrators specifically in regard to the Holocaust (Hartmut Lutz 2006). However, little attention has been given to how German Indianthusiasm connects with German settler colonialism in German South West Africa (DSWA). “German Indianthusiasm and Settler Colonialism: Pernicious Continuities” situates U.S. settler colonialism and German settler colonialism in DSWA as constitutive of a transnational settler colonial project, rather than distinct nationalist endeavors. Whereas representations of “Indians” in Wild West shows, Völkerschauen, and colonial exhibitions enabled Germany to position itself as a colonial power alongside other European nations during the German colonial period, contemporary iterations of Indianthusiasm allow German audiences to ignore their history of settler colonialism in DSWA and deflect responsibility for addressing this history. Exposing the simultaneity of “Indian” and “African” displays with the German colonial project in DSWA, and contemporary Wild West spaces juxtaposed by efforts to address Germany’s colonial legacy, this project tracks the pernicious continuities of colonial logics across geographic space and time. I suggest that Indianthusiasm allows a guilt-free realm to talk about decolonization, solidarity, and cross-cultural sharing with “Indians” without foundationally challenging the settler colonial ideologies inherent in the figure. For Germans to truly address their colonial heritage, and to make concerted efforts to address the representation of “Indians” in Germany, there must be an acknowledgement of how such ideologies are connected and persist over time.


Abstract: While significant scholarly attention has focused on the Israeli state’s efforts to control Palestinian intimate lives, a notable gap remains regarding the legal mechanisms, particularly the fragmented legal systems impacting Palestinian women in marriages involving holders of different identity cards in East Jerusalem and the broader political and ideological objectives of Israeli settler-colonialism. Accordingly, this study bridges the gap by investigating the enforcement of Sharia court judgements in these marriages, highlighting how such legal processes expose Palestinian women to the Israeli settler colonial project. It argues that mechanisms for executing Sharia court rulings – primarily concerning alimony and custody – establish five distinct relationships: (1) between J1 Jerusalemite women and Israeli authorities; (2) between J1 Jerusalemite women and the Palestinian Authority; (3) between J2 Jerusalemite/West Bank women and the Palestinian Authority; (4) between J2 Jerusalemite/West Bank women and Israeli authorities; and (5) between J1 and J2 Jerusalemite/West Bank women. The study asserts that these relationships regulate Palestinian women’s intimate lives and gendered roles, contributing to patterns of Israelization and Judaization, undermining Palestinian statehood, and fostering apartheid-like conditions among Palestinians of similar racial and cultural backgrounds. These dynamics fragment the Palestinian social fabric, advancing the elimination of Palestinians and the dominance of Jews.


Abstract: The history of South Africa is publicly commemorated as a process of dispossession of people from the land, massacres and cultural and linguistic attempted erasures. This public commemoration hardly recognises intimate geographies of settler colonialism in which Black women’s wombs were subjected to violent reproductive health technologies which had the intention of reducing Black fertility. This chapter asks how did the ontology of the ‘swart gevaar’, which is the fear of White people being swamped by Black people, institutionalised by settler colonial administrators and the apartheid government managed to wage war on Black women’s wombs. Inequalities of reproductive healthcare system in this post-apartheid moment are examined, and how they continue to send Black women to shallow graves. This chapter also reflects on ways in which Black women resisted settler colonial reproductive violence and developed their own reproductive health agencies, intimate freedoms and maintained indigenous reproductive health systems. It proposes that decolonial feminist project in South Africa should begin by exhuming Black women’s bodies from shallow of settler colonial reproductive violence and publicly commemorate them as radical sites of liberties, desires, names, songs, resistance, community and human dignity. Decolonising women’s wombs in South Africa will also require birthing new cultures of intimacy, building new homes of agency, reproductive liberties and dignified reproductive health services.