Abstract: This paper examines Israel’s systematic deployment of disinformation during its war on Gaza since October 2023, introducing the concept of ‘alethocide’ – the systemic destruction of truth. Using a mixed-methods approach combining cross-media ethnography and open-source intelligence, this study analyzes key disinformation campaigns across digital platforms, including the widely circulated “40 beheaded babies” narrative, state-sponsored influence operations targeting African Americans, and coordinated attacks on UNRWA. The research proposes a novel framework for assessing disinformation campaigns based on dimensions including intensity, reach, depth, penetration, recidivism, hierarchy, harm, and longevity. Findings reveal Israel’s production of atrocity propaganda, systematic efforts to dehumanize Palestinians, and organized campaigns to undermine humanitarian organizations. The study demonstrates how disinformation is modulated by geopolitical actors, media outlets, and tech platforms, which act as selective amplifiers within the broader technopolitical landscape. The research situates this alethocide within the context of settler colonialism and epistemic violence, arguing that disinformation serves not just to mask violence but to actively construct alternative realities that legitimize genocide. By examining the intersection of disinformation with power structures and technology, this study advances beyond traditional episodic definitions of disinformation to demonstrate how it functions as a component of symbolic power that reinforces existing geopolitical hierarchies.




Abstract: This article explores how settler self-government and written constitutions provoked questions about the responsibilities towards Indigenous peoples and the role of British parliament in the imperial constitution. It traces how British and settler commentators drew connections between colonies in their responses to Indigenous and humanitarian critiques of imperial policy, contributing to changing ideas about constitutions, self-government, and the future of empire. In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, self-government was a central component of British political thinking.Debates over self-government raised important questions with moral and ethical implications that politicians and public commentators grappled with throughout the empire. British politicians used self-government as a justification for empire and to distance themselves from responsibility for the injustices of settler colonialism. Constitutions were a flexible political technology that were used to justify imperial inaction and to manage the imperial conscience while facilitating a belief among British politicians that a legal empire could also be a moral one. Such visions never materialised. This article revisits the historic and continuing relationship between democracy, constitutions, and settler colonialism. It argues that as Britons debated the importance of self-government and colonial constitutions, seemingly settled constitutional ideas were deeply contested and remade through intercolonial debates.