Abstract: The conception of this article came to us at the end of a land-based healing program informed by Indigenous approaches to wellness. In this article, we dismantle psychiatric diagnosis, particularly the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM). Drawing on Frantz Fanon’s notion of sociodiagnosics, we put DSM diagnostic categories under a sociogenic microscope. We assert that the DSM and psychologizing discourses are cultural products born out of coloniality, which continue to serve as tools for the subjugation of iyiniwak (Indigenous peoples), a phenomenon termed psycholonization. After setting our intentions and describing Fanon’s sociodiagnostics, we will examine various disorders and symptomatology from a decolonial lens. By using the very language of the DSM, we make visible and “diagnose” the colonial logics and ideologies inherent in these categories. This includes addiction to, and obsessions with, excessive material wealth and power that has justified the dispossession of iyiniwak land and now is causing a climate crisis that threatens humanity and all our relations. We assert that these colonial logics and ideologies are pathogenic not only for iyiniwak but also for settlers and all people. In the second section, we recenter vastly different worldviews that underpin Indigenous approaches to “assessment” and “diagnosis,” including a nonlinear understanding of time, listening to and engaging wisdoms, and the acknowledgment of diversity and divergence as a given that is celebrated and honored. We end this article by addressing the importance of conceptual humility to rectify epistemic violence that is at the core of jagged diagnostic worldviews colliding.


Abstract: It is now widely acknowledged in the scholarship that Israel maintains a settler colonial regime, which has resulted in pervasive human rights abuses. However, the relation between ecology and settler colonialism in Palestine-Israel has only recently been subject to significant scholarly theorisation, despite the growing field of environmental colonialism and the present ecological crisis. This article adds to the limited field of eco-social and ecological settler colonial study of Palestine-Israel through the case study of Al-Walaja, a village in the illegally occupied West Bank, bordering the suburbs of East Jerusalem. Al-Walaja, a village known for its natural beauty and rich agricultural heritage, particularly its ancient terraced agriculture, has been transformed by Israeli settler colonial dispossession, which has claimed 89 per cent of the village’s land since 1947. This paper explores how settler colonialism and ecology intersect in Al-Walaja. First, by arguing that Al-Walaja is an example of the greenwashing and green grabbing practices that Israel uses to normalise the dispossession of Palestinians and obscure colonisation and environmental harms. Second, it examines how environmental harms, in particular restrictions on building in the village, cause the perpetuation of a settler colonial declensionist narrative and settler-native binary. Lastly, the decline of agriculture in Al-Walaja is contextualised in terms of the normalisation and erasure inherent to settler colonial projects.



Abstract: Several Coast Salish First Nations are actively involved in land reclamation and redevelopment in the greater Vancouver region (Canada). Through their for-profit development corporations, entities like Nch’ḵay̓ Development Corporation (Squamish Nation) and the joint-venture Musqueam, Squamish and Tsleil Waututh Development Corporation have become key players in the lucrative Vancouver property market in partnership with other public and private land developers. Situating multibillion-dollar holdings like the Jericho and Sen̓áḵw projects that further highest-and-best-use appraisal within the context of the area’s settler colonial history, we argue that land repossession and its associated development was made possible through settler colonial forms like corporate decisions, legal judgements and political frameworks that rendered land ready for disposal. Repossession thus created options for new types of reintegration into capitalist spheres, primarily as residential real estate projects, independent from specific configurations of land tenure as fee simple or reserve land. Advancing the concept of ‘accumulation by repossession,’ a recursive moment associated with dispossession, we describe how First Nations peoples are regaining land title and political-economic control at the same time as their development corporations are promoting urban capital accumulation through privatized profit making. Land ‘improvement’, speculation, and the creation of private real property have driven Indigenous dispossession in Coast Salish territory just as they now shape repossession.


Abstract: In this project, I turn to Chadwick Allen’s (Chickasaw ancestry) trans-Indigenous methodology to consider how two Indigenous North American authors move within Euro-Western genre, or move beyond it altogether, in making fictive texts that advance decoloniality and Indigenous artistic sovereignty. First, I read Stephen Graham Jones’s The Only Good Indians as a novel that adopts the exterior form of the mainstream slasher genre only to destabilize and indigenize the genre’s interior logic—its standard characters, narrative arcs, and tropes. By indigenizing this literary form, Jones not only undermines its conventions but also shows how it is founded on and perpetuates settler violence, how it serves as an optics for reading settler expansionism in the U.S. as slasher horror, and how it resonates with narratives that authorized the killing of Indigenous peoples as part of the settler project. Next, I turn to Tanya Tagaq’s written text Split Tooth and the music video for her track “Colonizer.” In the ways these texts portray kinship between Indigenous peoples and the other-than-human world, they function as what Daniel Heath Justice (Cherokee) calls Indigenous wonderworks. Read together, as what I call a trans-media Indigenous wonderwork, they support one another in bolstering Tagaq’s message of decoloniality and Indigenous artistic sovereignty. Allen’s trans-Indigenous methodology shows that, when juxtaposed—or read close together—Jones’s and Tagaq’s texts ultimately act as lenses or tools for interpreting Indigenous cultural production that works within and beyond mainstream Euro-Western genres.


Abstract: The COVID-19 pandemic was experienced by nearly every person around the world. However, while the pandemic was borne by everyone, the weight of everyone’s burden was not equal and was heavily influenced by preexisting inequalities and harmful social structures. As they have in the past, Indigenous peoples in Canada, as well as around the world, experienced disproportionate impacts and losses from this most recent crisis. This may be largely connected to the ongoing presence of settler colonial ideologies and structures which, among other issues, resulted in a lack of necessary infrastructure needed to manage the pandemic within First Nations, as well as a patronizing disregard for Indigenous pandemic decision-making. In conjunction, disaster capitalism ensued throughout the pandemic, a practice defined by Naomi Klein as the exploitation of crises by the powerful to further their own agendas, which worked to further compound and hinder Indigenous efforts to ensure community safety and well-being. However, First Nations nonetheless determinedly asserted their self-determination, challenging harmful decision-making and prioritizing community well-being. This project utilizes two cases (Case Study 1: Keeyask Lockdown, Manitoba and Case Study 2: Ring of Fire, Ontario) to examine how the pervasive ideologies of settler colonialism interacted and influenced disaster capitalism during the pandemic, as well as how Indigenous Environmental Justice (IEJ) was then enacted by communities. An analysis of these cases demonstrate that, while disaster capitalism and IEJ were prevalent during COVID-19, the specific circumstances were nonetheless shaped by distinct, place-based histories and relationships among settlers and Indigenous peoples. Moreover, this project explores the narratives surrounding these cases, including how they were presented to the public by various Mainstream, Alternative/Advocacy and Indigenous news outlets by utilizing a media analysis. This analysis notably observed the considerable inclusion of settler narratives/biases by Mainstream sources, while Alternative/Advocacy, and Indigenous sources specifically, highlighted Indigenous voices/experiences and the context of sovereignty. Lastly, and being mindful of the general disregard and absence of Indigenous voices within academia and news media, the inclusion of a community experience chapter highlights placebased Indigenous experiences and ways of knowing regarding the Keeyask case study; Demonstrating the complexity of Indigenous relationships with industry and settler government, these experiences moreover spoke to a dedication to continue to take action, heal and move forward in a good way. By exploring these subjects of settler colonialism, disaster capitalism and Indigenous Environmental Justice through various lens’ (case studies, media analysis and community experiences) and by utilizing a two-eyed seeing approach which borrowed from qualitative and Indigenous methodologies, this project demonstrates the value of employing multiple perspectives and storytelling when striving to formulate contextualized, respectful and meaningful research.