Abstract: This graduate thesis involves a retelling of the history of the now defunct Canton Insane Asylum, built in the early 20th century located in Canton, South Dakota. It was America’s first federal psychiatric facility dedicated exclusively for American Indians. The Canton Insane Asylum for American Indians is a touchstone whose microhistory reflects larger political and economic sentiments in both the state of South Dakota and in the United States writ large. Conceiving South Dakota, as first and foremost a white settler society erected on land forcibly wrested from American Indian people, the asylum played an important economic development role and helped transform Canton, South Dakota. All of this was accomplished through physical and medical violence and exploitation of vulnerable American Indians. The Canton Insane Asylum for American Indians was aided and abetted by cheerleading state officials and callously managed by various colonial superintendents of whom one is particularly noteworthy—Dr. Harry Reid Hummer. Methodologically, this thesis leverages archival records (housed and littered across three national archives: Kansas City, Dallas, Texas, and Washington, D.C. as well as state archives) consisting of governmental reports, the insane asylum’s financial records, oral testimonies, and patient case files. Where primary sources are lacking, secondary sources are used. More specifically, the thesis highlights the brutal scientific management and medical practices as carried out by the insane asylum executives and staff members; the inherent capitalistic ethos propelling the insane asylum, the business of confinement, and the manner in which pseudoscience and epidemiology data were contorted to justify the confinement of American Indians. The first patient arrived in 1902, and the facility permanently closed in 1934 due to dehumanizing conditions. Over its lifetime, it warehoused more than three-hundred and seventy American Indians.


Excerpt: The transmission of food culture is a long, slow, organic process, an immersive experiential learning communicated across generations and across frontiers, with ruptures due to emigration, war, and displacement. The contributions to this second special edition of the Jerusalem Quarterly devoted to Palestinian food and foodways draw attention to the role of women, men, and children in securing this transmission, and the deliberate interference in this transmission to serve political agendas. From traditional wedding celebrations in early twentieth-century Palestine to contemporary cookery books and vlogs, transmission is examined through the lenses of Palestinian and diasporic identities, settler colonialism, commodification, resistance, survival, and “gastro-diplomacy.” Lifestyles become an embodiment of food practices interwoven with relationships and identities, with the Gaza Food Kitchen as a poignant example of community mobilization and documenting “the heartbreaking [current] realities on the ground.” Social media posts and reels show the preparation of traditional dishes while bombs are being dropped on Gaza, familiar existential images as the war enters its second year, confirming how sheer survival is a form of resistance. Settler colonialism is scrutinized as an agent of rupture that unsettles age-old practices, denies Indigeneity, tampers with memory, and alters history in the service of a triumphant Zionism keen on constructing a narrative to suppport its colonizing claims to Palestine.




Abstract: This paper examines the intricate dynamics of accountability within the context of historical and political power imbalances in the Palestine-Israel relationship. It explores the paradoxical nature of accountability in settler-colonial contexts, focusing on why accountability mechanisms frequently fail to serve Indigenous populations. Using empirical illustrations of revenue-sharing mechanisms, the study reveals how the settler state—Israel—exerts control over tax revenues accrued to the Palestinian Authority (PA), arbitrarily deducting expenses without transparency or oversight. This lack of transparency leaves the PA uninformed about actual revenue figures and unable to scrutinise deductions, exacerbating power imbalances, weakening internal accountability mechanisms, and increasing vulnerability to corruption. The paper contributes to the growing body of research on accountability practices affecting Indigenous populations by examining their intersection with settler colonialism. It highlights how settler states prioritise their sovereignty to undermine accountability structures and marginalise Indigenous governance. Drawing on concepts such as “settler sovereignty” and “primitive accumulation,” the paper advances the literature on accounting’s role in dispossession, disempowerment, and systemic oppression. Furthermore, it underscores the pivotal role of financial control as a tool of settler-colonial domination, offering valuable insights into the broader implications of accountability within such frameworks.


Excerpt: Zahi Zalloua’s Solidarity and the Palestinian Cause (2023) is well worth reading. In chapters on identification and surveillance, occupation and colonization of thought, ressentiment and paranoia, and sovereignty, the book offers an urgent, vitally intelligent critical-theoretical take on “Palestine”—I scare-quote the word to mark its overdetermined multivalence, its simultaneous signification as subjectivity, ethnicity, conflict, political-cultural cause, national struggle, etc.—that avoids the common identitarian traps. Zalloua explains that the book is a sequel of sorts to 2017’s Continental Philosophy and the Palestinian Question, where he takes on postwar philosophy’s embrace of an idealization of “the Jew” as the paradigm for ethical inquiry. In that earlier book he incisively argued that while intellectuals imagined “the Jewish question” as accessing the universal in figuring Christian Enlightenment’s Other, this guilty phantasm was in its exceptionalism ideologically cognate with Zionism’s “exclusionary” settler colonial project; in response, Zalloua elaborated the “Palestinian question,” “forclose[d]” by Zionism, as a way of rendering conspicuous “the others” of that idealized “Other” (Zalloua 2017, 7). Here he extends that discussion. Solidarity and the Palestinian Cause begins with a discussion of “Indigenous Reason,” an adaptation of Achille Mbembe’s “black reason” (2017). Mbembe provides Zalloua a way to analyze Palestinian indigeneity without relying on the same zero-sum historicist concept of identity that Zionism relies on for its project to legitimize an exclusivist Jewish claim to the historical land of Palestine. Zalloua emphasizes the biopolitical core of Zionism: that Palestinians’ “sheer presence is an existential threat and an offense to” Zionism’s setter-colonial “demographic advantage” and supremacist “right to belong.” This is the phantasmatic force supporting Israel’s vast machinery of Palestinian population control. As he sharpens the point, “In the Zionist order of things, for Jewish life to matter, Palestinian life must un-matter” (11). Evading this biopolitical trap and the pissing match between historical subjects presumably bearing opposing rights to belong that it inevitably entails—and which has issued in Oslo’s legitimation of the two-state solution’s “ghettoized sovereignty” (134), a “cynical tool” (131) that “ideologically rebrand[s]” the “racist” status quo as an “ideal” (135)—Zalloua pursues a critique of indigeneity that does not demand allegiance to, or rely on the conceptual security blanket of, the chimerical purity of an imagined “pristine time before the settler,” a construction he borrows from Frank B. Wilderson III’s Afropessimist challenge to ideological insularity and separatism (2017, 3; of course it’s worth noting that originalist historicist fantasies are central also to Zionism’s own legitimation project)