settler colonial studies blog
about
definition
books
journal
«
Integration requires disintegration: Paloma E. Villegas, Breanna Barrie, Serriz Peña, Jilanch Alphonso, Alveera Mamoon, ‘Integration, Settler Colonialism, and Precarious Legal Status Migrants in Canada’, Journal of International Migration and Integration, 2019, pp. 1–17
Erasing present indigenous people by focusing on long gone ones: Lee M. Panich, Tsim D. Schneider, ‘Categorical Denial: Evaluating Post-1492 Indigenous Erasure in the Paper Trail of American Archaeology’, American Antiquity, 2019
»
Foreclosing indigenous people, literally: K-Sue Park, ‘Money, Mortgages, and the Conquest of America’, Law & Social Enquiry, 41, 4, 2016, pp. 10006-1035
01Sep19
Abstract:
In colonial America, land acquired new liquidity when it became liable for debts. Though English property law maintained a firm distinction between land and chattel for centuries, in the American colonies, the boundary between the categories of real and personal property began to disintegrate. There, the novelty of easy foreclosure and consequent easy alienation of land made it possible for colonists to obtain credit, using land as a security. However, scholars have neglected the first instances in which a newly unconstrained practice of mortgage foreclosure appeared—the transactions through which colonists acquired land from indigenous people in the first place. In this article, I explore these early transactions for land, which took place across fundamental differences between colonists’ and native communities’ conceptions of money, land, and exchange itself. I describe how difference and dependence propelled the growth of the early American contact economy to make land into real estate, or the fungible commodity on the speculative market that it remains today.
Share this:
Share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
Facebook
Share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
Reddit
Share on X (Opens in new window)
X
Print (Opens in new window)
Print
Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
Email
Like
Loading...
Related
Filed under:
Uncategorized
|
Closed
Settler colonialism is a global and transnational phenomenon, and as much a thing of the past as a thing of the present. Settlers 'come to stay': they are founders of political orders who carry with them a distinct sovereign capacity.
If you're a scholar, and you find some of your work featured on the blog, then chances are that we want it for
our journal.
what’s new
Ontological sovereignty against settler violences: Nadera Shalhoub-Kevorkian, Abeer Otman, ‘Enacting Lived Sovereignty Amid Epistemic and Ontological Violence in the Settler-Colonial Academy’, Sociological Forum, 2026
Settler colonial studies revisited: Jay Lalonde, ‘Settler Colonialism and the Politics of Colonialism’, in Maddalena Marinari (ed.), Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Migration Studies, OUP, 2026
Asian settler colonisers: Hana Maruyama, ‘Asian Diasporas and US Settler Colonialism’, in Maddalena Marinari (ed.), Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Migration Studies, OUP, 2026
Italian settler colonisers: Emanuele Ertola, ‘Italian Settlers and Decolonization’, in Maddalena Marinari (ed.), Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Migration Studies, OUP, 2026
The last settler frontier? Jess Arnett, Settler Imperialism: Alaska Natives and the Myth of the Last Frontier, De Gruyter Brill, 2026
Indigenous oral history is needed: Mohammed Nijim, ‘Indigenous Epistemologies and Decolonising Genocide Research on Palestine’, Journal of Holy Land and Palestine Studies, 25, 1, 2026
Cloning acceptable indigeneities: Debbie Bargallie, ‘Producing the “good Indigenous employee”: cultural cloning and the reproduction of sameness in the Australian workplace, Ethnic and Racial studies, 2026
Picture this (i.e., a settler colonial citizenship): Fay Anderson, Jane Lydon, Melissa Miles, Amanda Nettelbeck (eds), Picturing Citizenship: Images, Belonging and Colonial Legacies in the Settler Nation, Bloomsbury, 2025
Soviet-settler Territorialism: Gamze İme, ‘The Crimean Jewish Autonomy Project of the 1920s–30s’, Journal of Jewish Studies, 77, 1, 2026
Decolonial ruralisation in the settler colony: Ettore Santi, Ethan Matthews, ‘Ruralization as decolonization: Land, property, and possibilities in North America’, Dialogues in Human Geography, 2026
Militant ignorance to settler colonialism: Lara Fricke, German Militant Ignorance towards Palestinian Experiences of Israeli Settler Colonialism, PhD dissertation, University of Exeter, 2026
The settler triangle: Fearghal Mac Bhloscaidh, ‘Dromore and Trillick: revolution and reaction on a colonial frontier, 1906–22’, Settler Colonial Studies, 2026
It’s an improvement! (no it isn’t): Lorenzo Veracini, ‘Book Review: Settler Colonial Sovereignty: Visions of Improvement and Indigenous Erasure by Liam Midzain-Gobin’, International Journal: Canada’s Journal of Global Policy Analysis, 2026
The settlers’ ‘dream’: Neerej Dev, ‘From Rivermind to Care Homes: Settler Dreams and Britain’s Care Crisis; the cannibalistic business model depicted in Common People holds up a mirror to Britain’s predatory social-care infrastructure’, Economic & Political Weekly, lXI, 11, 2026, pp. 71-72
Auctioning settler colonialism (mobilising preaccumulation): Reinoud Vermoesen, ‘A world without stuff? Public auctions in a colonial setting: Kingston (New York) in the seventeenth century’, in Bruno Blondé, Anne Sophie Overkamp, Jon Stobart (eds), Auctions and Households in the Eighteenth-Century World: Comparative Perspectives from Across the Globe, 1700-1850, Routledge, 2026
contribute
email the editor
Reblog
Subscribe
Subscribed
settler colonial studies blog
Join 282 other subscribers
Sign me up
Already have a WordPress.com account?
Log in now.
settler colonial studies blog
Subscribe
Subscribed
Sign up
Log in
Copy shortlink
Report this content
View post in Reader
Manage subscriptions
Collapse this bar
%d