Settler parliaments as (go figure) settler colonial institutions: Harry Hobbs, ‘First Nations, Settler Parliaments, and the Question of Consultation: Reconciling Parliamentary Supremacy and Indigenous Peoples’ Right to Self-Determination’, Osgoode Hall Law Journal, 58, 2, 2021, pp. 337-384 | settler colonial studies blog

Settler parliaments as (go figure) settler colonial institutions: Harry Hobbs, ‘First Nations, Settler Parliaments, and the Question of Consultation: Reconciling Parliamentary Supremacy and Indigenous Peoples’ Right to Self-Determination’, Osgoode Hall Law Journal, 58, 2, 2021, pp. 337-384

20Jul21

Abstract: First Nations peoples assert a right to a distinctive relationship with the state based on their pre-colonial
status as self-governing sovereign communities. Ascertaining the scope of First Nations peoples’
collective right to self-determination is complex, but there is broad international agreement that it
encompasses a right to be consulted on state action that will affect their interests, including in the lawmaking process. The problem is that the right to be consulted in the development of legislation appears
to place a constraint on the power of the legislature to propose, debate, amend, and enact laws as they
see fit. Does the right to consultation unduly or impermissibly fetter democratic government by imposing
a procedural or substantive restriction on the introduction of proposed laws? Can this entitlement be
reconciled with the constitutional value of parliamentary supremacy? In recent years, the highest courts in
Australia, Canada, and Aotearoa New Zealand have explored these questions. This paper examines those
decisions and considers their consequences for the appropriate constitutional relationship between First
Nations Peoples and the State.

Filed under: Uncategorized | Closed