« Analize this: Martin Kemp, ‘The psychoanalytic encounter with settler colonialism in Palestine/Israel’, International Journal of Applied Psychoanalytic Studies, 17, 2, 2020, pp. 93-125
Black Indigeneity: Bennett Brazelton, ‘On the erasure of Black Indigeneity’, Review of Education, Pedagogy, and Cultural Studies, 2021 »

Reclaiming signs and symbols: Heidi Nicholls, ‘Colonial and Decolonial Resignification: US Empire-state Sovereignty in Hawai‘i’, Global Historical Sociology of Race and Racism, 2021

11Sep21

Abstract: This chapter analyzes the semiotic construction of US claims to sovereignty in Hawai‘i. Building on semiotic theories in sociology and theories within critical Indigenous and settler colonial studies, it presents an interpretive analysis of state, military, and academic discursive strategies. The US empire-state attempts to construct colonial narratives of race and sovereignty that rehistoricize the history of Hawaiians and other Indigenous peoples. In order to make claims to sovereignty, settler-colonists construct narratives that build upon false claims to superiority, advancement, and discovery. Colonial resignification is a process by which signs and symbols of Indigenous communities are conscripted into the myths of empire that maintain such sovereign claims. Yet, for this reason, colonial resignification can be undone through reclaiming such signs and symbols from their use within colonial metanarratives. In this case, efforts toward decolonial resignification enacted alternative metanarratives of peoples’ relationships to place. This “flip side” of the synecdoche is a process that unravels the ties that bind layered myths by providing new answers to questions that underpin settler colonial sovereignty.


Filed under: Uncategorized   |  Closed
%d bloggers like this: