One or two decolonisations? Andrew Curley, Pallavi Gupta, Lara Lookabaugh, Christopher Neubert, Sara Smith, ‘Decolonisation is a Political Project: Overcoming Impasses between Indigenous Sovereignty and Abolition’, Antipode, 2022 | settler colonial studies blog

One or two decolonisations? Andrew Curley, Pallavi Gupta, Lara Lookabaugh, Christopher Neubert, Sara Smith, ‘Decolonisation is a Political Project: Overcoming Impasses between Indigenous Sovereignty and Abolition’, Antipode, 2022

07Apr22

Abstract: In this article we seek to intervene in conversations that frame Black abolition and decolonisation as antagonistic political projects. We respond to Garba and Sorentino’s (2020) “Slavery is a metaphor”, which critiques Tuck and Yang (2012; “Decolonization is not a metaphor”) and decolonisation. Our concern is that scholarship in this vein denies Indigenous sovereignty and futurity while unnecessarily characterising decolonisation as antiblack. We contend that ontological, epistemological, and disciplinary traps lead to this problem: reductions, conflations, and taking settler-enslavers’ word as truth. We suggest that critiques of settler colonial studies shouldn’t be confused with the aims of Indigenous decolonisation, where the former is largely driven by white scholarship and the latter is an Indigenous-led project rooted in Indigenous epistemologies. We focus on questions of land and sovereignty, gesturing toward framings that are inclusive of Black, Native, and immigrant communities.

Filed under: Uncategorized | Closed

Settler colonialism is a global and transnational phenomenon, and as much a thing of the past as a thing of the present. Settlers 'come to stay': they are founders of political orders who carry with them a distinct sovereign capacity.
If you're a scholar, and you find some of your work featured on the blog, then chances are that we want it for our journal.
what’s new
contribute

email the editor

%d bloggers like this: