Settler completion now? (debating the Indigenous voice to the Australian parliament) Murray Goot, Tim Rowse, ‘The Debate Over the Constitutional Recognition of Indigenous Australians: National Unity and Memories of the 1967 Referendum’, Australian Journal of Politics and History, 2023 | settler colonial studies blog

Settler completion now? (debating the Indigenous voice to the Australian parliament) Murray Goot, Tim Rowse, ‘The Debate Over the Constitutional Recognition of Indigenous Australians: National Unity and Memories of the 1967 Referendum’, Australian Journal of Politics and History, 2023

23May23

Excerpt: In the debate over constitutional recognition of Indigenous Australians since 2010, the high “Yes” vote in 1967 has been recalled as a benchmark of national unity and goodwill towards Indigenous Australians, something to which Australians must return. The 1967 referendum has been evoked as a “step” towards reconciliation, with constitutional recognition presented as the next step. The “recognition” that the 1967 referendum enabled has been (mis)represented as allowing Indigenous Australians to be counted in the Census, hence to “count” more generally. Explaining constitutional changes to voters in the referendum on an Indigenous Voice, “Yes” and “No” campaigns are likely to describe amendments in emotively powerful terms. False memories of “recognition” obscure a political fissure within the myth of 1967. Some who celebrate 1967 have wanted the Constitution to continue to distinguish Indigenous from nonIndigenous Australians, one understanding of the 1967 amendment to Section 51(xxvi); others have hoped that the next referendum would complete the deletion of distinguishing words that had begun in 1967 with the repeal of Section 127. The myths of 1967 combine to accommodate opposing ideals of national “unity”, allowing protagonists in the debate to read the “lessons” of 1967 in ways that reinforce their own political perspectives.

Filed under: Uncategorized | Closed

%d bloggers like this: