« Suburban settler colonialism: Sean Tyler, ‘The Settler-Suburban Imaginary: Improvement, John Claudius Loudon, and Colonial Dispossession in the Swan River Colony’, Fabrications, 2026
Bilingual settler colonialsm: E. Haque, ‘Dual white settler coloniality and the genealogy of indigenous language policy’, Language Policy, 2026 »

Protection, assimilation, settler colonialism: Andrew Woolford, ‘Protective legislation and paternalism: assimilative indigenous education in the US and Canada, 1928-1953’, Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 2026

26Oct26

Abstract: In both the US and Canada third pillar protective legislation was largely oriented towards the promoting assimilation and solving the ‘Indian problem’. It provided a context and frame of reference for the establishment and shaping of a key component of second pillar Indigenous policy – the promotion of church-run, state-funded boarding schools (US) and residential schools (Canada) expressly created to eradicate Indigenous Peoples by erasing their languages, religions, cultures, and identities. However, while the trends were largely similar in the US and Canada, differing constellations of individual and institutional actors – reformers, activists, bureaucrats, churches, and states – at times allowed for some notable distinctions in the two nations. I explore the character and role of third pillar protective legislation and how it shaped second pillar education policy and schools in US and Canadian history, highlighting where and how it diverged, as well as how these trends have influenced contemporary Indigenous politics in each country.


Filed under: Uncategorized   |  Closed