Abstract: Australian railway histories are dominated by narratives of engineering triumphs, colonial expansion into empty land, and bringing civilisation and development through railway infrastructure. These settler-colonial stories can be read back on themselves as histories and geographies of Aboriginal dispossession and colonial possession. Indeed, Aboriginal people, lands, waterways, and cultures have always been implicated in railway infrastructures, willingly or not. Aboriginal people’s entanglements with the New South Wales railways, to which we refer as “rail relations,” have involved dispossession, removal, employment, mobility, and travel, including the forced removal of children known as the Stolen Generations. These are relations of harm, loss, and grief but also of pride, connectivity, and survival. We argue in this paper that when Aboriginal communities engage in storying the New South Wales railways as Aboriginal they reassemble this infrastructure otherwise: not just as a tool of dispossession but also as life affirming. Indigenous storytelling can therefore overcome settler colonial erasure and the oversimplification of railway infrastructure hi/stories. Research about how Aboriginal lives have been interconnected with railways expansion and development is limited. While Aboriginal railway stories are continuously told within communities, they remain almost entirely silenced elsewhere. Overcoming the invisibility of Aboriginal rail relations is crucial as both truth-telling of the past and to ensure more just infrastructural outcomes now and in the future.


Abstract: In this dissertation, I provide a place-based examination of settler fire management in the Boreal Forest region of what is lately known as the Canadian province of Saskatchewan. In Chapter 1, I start with a historical examination of settler colonialism in the kistapinānihk, or Prince Albert, region of the province, which is my home community and the site of state-led wildfire management in Saskatchewan. Drawing from Indigenous studies and settler colonial studies research, I argue that settler colonialism in the region is characterized by: the violation of agreements with Indigenous Nations, communities and people; ecological change for the purpose of developing and maintaining settler economies; and settler-led conquest characterized by genocide and Indigenous erasure. In Chapter 2, I describe anti-colonial placed-based research, including how my positioning as a non-Indigenous settler researcher informed my research topics, questions, methods and analysis. In the subsequent article-style chapters, I examine two areas of wildfire management in the province: (1) agency-led wildfire response and policy; and (2) wildfire research and practice as is characterized by dominant science and this dissertation. In Chapter 3, I examine the history of fire tower development in the province, including a recent shift towards remotely-operated cameras, showing how wildfire detection in the province has, at times, been colonial insofar as it renders Indigenous lands and labour exploitable to achieve settler state economic and political goals. In Chapter 4, I document the quarter-century long controversy about what many Indigenous northerners refer to as the ‘Let-it-Burn’ policy, showing how provincial practices of fire suppression render many Indigenous ‘values-at-risk’ expendable under the guiding premise that fires are ‘natural’ in certain regions. In Chapter 5, co-authors Robin Mcleod, Dr. Herman Michell and myself conduct a systematic literature review of wildfire science pertaining to climate change in the province, showing how Indigenous erasure permeates dominant scientific research practices, which in turn impacts scientific knowledge of wildfire issues. In Chapter 6, I examine these findings as they relate to Indigenous and settler jurisdiction, concepts of universalism and place-based knowledge, and settling as research practice. Reframing settling as an ethical orientation to uphold obligations with Indigenous Nations, I suggest that settlers may contribute to anti-colonialism within fire management and research by working collectively with Indigenous Nations to push back against practices of conquest and uphold agreements for shared jurisdiction.


Access the intervention here.



Abstract: This thesis presents a critical textual analysis of what I call the reconciliation change narrative in the Canadian settler philanthropy sector, as expressed across an archive of 156 texts produced from 2008-2022 by four philanthropic organizations and their members: one Indigenous-led intermediary (the Circle); three settler-led philanthropic intermediaries (Imagine Canada, Community Foundations Canada [CFC], and Philanthropic Foundations Canada [PFC]); and one widely read sector publication called The Philanthropist. Engagement with the concept of reconciliation became common in the Canadian settler philanthropy world after 2015. Change narratives like reconciliation are stories whereby philanthropic actors situate themselves in the social order and justify their activities; they are simultaneously discursive and affective formations with important material functions, directing organizational and sectoral policies, and shaping giving and granting decisions, institutional practices, and giving relationships. Across my chapters, I explore how diverse and dissonant expressions of the reconciliation change narrative can maintain colonial durabilities, working to mask or obscure the ongoing workings of colonial violence in the settler philanthropy sector and the wider world, especially through what Coulthard (2014) calls colonial recognition and Vimalessary et al. (2016) describe as colonial unknowing. At other times the texts I analyze present alternative possibilities for and beyond dominant expressions of reconciliation and settler philanthropy. These shift the focus away from the colonial politics of reconciliation toward the advancement of relations of reparations, reciprocity and refusal. Drawing on diverse approaches and theoretical frameworks from critical discourse analysis, affect theory, decolonial studies and philanthropic studies, I demonstrate through this analysis that Canadian settler philanthropy’s relations to coloniality are, and always have been, characterized by dissonance.


Access the chapter here.