Description: Hungry Listening is the first book to consider listening from both Indigenous and settler colonial perspectives. A critical response to what has been called the “whiteness of sound studies,” Dylan Robinson evaluates how decolonial practices of listening emerge from increasing awareness of our listening positionality. This, he argues, involves identifying habits of settler colonial perception and contending with settler colonialism’s “tin ear” that renders silent the epistemic foundations of Indigenous song as history, law, and medicine. With case studies on Indigenous participation in classical music, musicals, and popular music, Hungry Listening examines structures of inclusion that reinforce Western musical values. Alongside this inquiry on the unmarked terms of inclusion in performing arts organizations and compositional practice, Hungry Listening offers examples of “doing sovereignty” in Indigenous performance art, museum exhibition, and gatherings that support an Indigenous listening resurgence. Throughout the book, Robinson shows how decolonial and resurgent forms of listening might be affirmed by writing otherwise about musical experience. Through event scores, dialogic improvisation, and forms of poetic response and refusal, he demands a reorientation toward the act of reading as a way of listening. Indigenous relationships to the life of song are here sustained in writing that finds resonance in the intersubjective experience between listener, sound, and space





Excerpt: Fanon’s insights on colonialism, oppression, and the division between colonizers and the colonized resonate profoundly when examining the complex and enduring struggle in Palestine. His writings shed light on the intricacies of a struggle where a colonial dividing line has been etched deep into the landscape and consciousness of the region. In exploring Fanon’s perspective on the colonial experience, and applying it to the Palestinian context, we gain a deeper understanding of the dynamics that have shaped the Israeli-Palestinian colonial entanglement. From the physical barriers of walls, checkpoints and daily violence to the social, cultural, and psychological divides, Fanon’s framework provides valuable insights into the ongoing struggle for justice, freedom, right of return, sovereignty, and peace in Palestine. This exploration seeks to illuminate the multifaceted layers of the conflict through the lens of Fanon’s astute analysis, highlighting the enduring relevance of his work in understanding the complexities of colonialism and its lasting impact on societies around the world, including Palestine. Palestine’s geographical world is a colonized one divided in two; the colonized are the indigenous Palestinians and the colonizers are the Zionists and all their Western allies. In this geography and per Fanon’s framing, “the dividing line, the border, is represented by the” military barracks, bases, concrete walls, and the sniper stations. Thus, in the Palestinian colonial experience, everything revolves around the “power” of the Israeli (colonial) Defense Force, settlements and settlers, and persistent structured violence.




Abstract: This dissertation focuses on artworks by Andy Warhol, Brian Jungen, Mike Kelley and Rebecca Belmore. These works emerged in the wake of a shift that commenced in the 1960s and 1970s, as Canada and the United States largely changed their state policies towards Indigenous peoples from coercive assimilation to a form of political recognition based on the accommodation of cultural difference. These changes were a response to Indigenous activism across the continent, which altered the terms of engagement between these nation-states and Indigenous peoples with respect to settler colonialism’s characteristic process of dispossession. The artists I study explore the persistence of settler imaginaries, revealing both the seeming exhaustion of old stereotypes and their tenacious emotional and psychological grip on mainstream North American culture. The promises of multiculturalism and equal citizenship held out by the paradigm of political recognition were never suited to mediate relations between citizens from a multitude of Indigenous nations with complex sovereignty claims overlapping with the settler states of Canada and the United States. Yet this new paradigm also faced profound challenges posed by the neoliberal drive, starting in the 1970s, to impose market logics on more and more aspects of life. The struggles of the civil and women’s rights movements to win recognition as equal citizens involved emphasizing the differences of their respective constituencies, a social dynamic to which capitalist consumer markets quickly adapted. The artworks I address here reflect on forms of subjectivity profoundly shaped by the pervasion of consumerism and reveal the increasing demands placed on artists to perform their identities in ways that foreground their difference to gain recognition from the art market, state arts funding bodies, and the dominant organs of art criticism. My first case study, discussing some of Warhol’s final works, ruminates on how his commitment to “business art” figured this kind of subjectivity in relation to a settler-colonial imaginary that he explicitly associated with the commodity par excellence: money. Jungen, Kelley and Belmore each incorporated these new pressures to perform into their work, even as they slyly subverted, or outright refused the imperatives fueling these demands. Each of the projects discussed here calls attention to the economic circuits through which performances of identity are mediated in institutional art contexts. They show that this economy refracts both the desires and expectations of a broader public, but is deeply contingent on the unique emotional incentives that structure art’s consumption in its rarified institutional spaces.