Excerpt: Eiichiro Azuma and Greg Dvorak gift us with two important and richly researched books that deepen our understanding of how settler colonialism operates as a connective mechanism tying Japanese and US imperialisms. My response applies a concept from one study to the other; both questions stem from my interest in Blackness and the African diaspora in the Pacific, or the Black Pacific. Eiichiro: how would a focus on indigeneity, including Indigenous voices and lives—a particular strength of Dvorak’s Coral and Concrete: Remembering Kwajalein Atoll between Japan, America, and the Marshall Islands—illuminate the effects of your articulation of “adaptive settler colonialism?” Greg: How would a more encompassing analysis of race, highlighted in Azuma’s In Search of Our Frontier: Japanese America and Settler Colonialism in the Construction of Japan’s Borderless Empire, expand our understanding of the Marshallese and their experiences in and beyond Micronesia? Both books engage the interactive, overlapping, and distinct imperial interests and settler practices of Japan and the United States. They detail the diversity within and hierarchies among racialized, national, and Indigenous populations. Azuma and Dvorak theorize how global processes and individual actors come together to reveal the mechanics of domination, displacement, and resistance. Azuma offers a top-down approach in his study of Japan’s uneven success in implementing imperial ambitions though their settlements of “new Japans” in regions spanning North and South America, the Pacifc, and other parts of Asia. Dvorak pins his attention to Kwajalein, a main islet of the Marshall Islands in the Micronesian region of the Pacifc, to show how its people, reef, land, and missile-illuminated skies have been cumulatively affected by Japanese, US, and Marshallese exchanges.




Abstract: This volume examines migration to Australia through the critical lens of Indigenous sovereignty, arguing for a fundamental rethinking of migration studies within settler colonial contexts. While migration and Indigenous studies have developed largely in parallel, this book challenges that separation by foregrounding the entanglements between migrant arrivals and the ongoing dispossession of Indigenous lands and peoples. The collection centres Indigenous epistemologies and critiques the ways in which celebratory multicultural narratives have obscured the colonial foundations of the Australian state. This introduction sets out the volume’s methodological framework, drawing on decolonial, antiracist, and Indigenous scholarship to critique disciplinary silos and advocate for reflexive, participatory, and community-informed research. Editors and contributors—many of whom are migrants or descendants of migrants—explore their own positionalities and the responsibilities of working and researching on unceded Indigenous land. The volume’s structure reflects its commitment to interdisciplinarity and undisciplined inquiry, with contributions ranging from autoethnographic reflection to critical policy analysis and media studies. Through case studies involving Greek and Italian diaspora, language policy, cinema, literature, and activist art, the chapters engage with the complexities of migrant-Indigenous relations, revealing tensions as well as possibilities for solidarity. The introduction also critiques the absence of Indigenous perspectives in leading migration studies handbooks, highlighting the volume’s intervention in the field. This collection thus offers a significant scholarly and ethical challenge to conventional migration research, proposing that any decolonial agenda must begin by recognising Indigenous sovereignty and reconfiguring the frameworks through which migration is studied, understood, and represented in settler colonial societies.


Description: This open access edited collection provides an interdisciplinary assessment of research about migration on Indigenous lands. Via an assortment of critical reflections from settler colonial Australia, it identifies tensions between colonialism and Indigenous sovereignty as an increasingly salient topic of analysis within migration research. It poses challenges to migration research that takes place on Indigenous lands, reflects on the methodological and theoretical issues at play when studying migration in settler colonial Australia, and outlines potential pathways for ethical migration research agendas that genuinely engage with Indigenous knowledges and scholarship.  The book also compares and synthesizes where studies of settler colonialism and migration have intersected and contributing authors profile how migration, colonialism and Indigenous sovereignties intersect in multicultural Australia’s pasts and presents. At its core, the volume challenges migration studies, from Australian shores, to reimagine itself. In doing so, questions related to migration are altered and the basis of discussion around colonial legacies, multiculturalism, integration and diversity is recast. By providing nuanced theoretical, historical, and reflective case studies from a rage of disciplinary approaches, the volume will be a great resource to students, academics in migration and refugee studies, Indigenous scholars, activists, as well as policymakers in settler colonial societies.




Excerpt: Settler colonialism was never inevitable in North America. It was always vulnerable to defeat at the hands of the colonized who waged anticolonial wars in defense of their territories and governance. Anticolonial war was the reminder of settler colonialism’s limits and weaknesses that its narratives of conquest disavowed. When US settlers invaded Indigenous lands of the western seaboard following the United States’ imperial war that seized Mexico’s northern territories in 1848, they confronted erupting anticolonial wars with the potential to upend US rule. One of the most formidable anticolonial war campaigns during this period was the Garra Uprising of 1851. Antonio Garra, a leader of the Cupeño nation, united and led the Cupeños, Cahuillas, Cocopahs, Kumeyaay, Luiseño, and Quechan in armed rebellion to rout US settlers from southern California. Garra’s forces seized settlers’ livestock, destroyed enemy infrastructure, and killed in battle those who tried to repress the uprising. Garra specifically targeted settlers known for anti-Indigenous abuse and violence. US military forces and state militias scrambled to contain the uprising. It only came to an end due to internal disunity. Garra was betrayed by a fellow leader, Juan Antonio of the Chuillas, who used a coalition meeting with Garra as a trap to capture and deliver him to US authorities. Joshua Bean, the Major General of California’s state militia, formally arrested Garra and charged him with treason against the United States. Despite arguing that he had never pledged loyalty to the United States as the leader of a sovereign Indigenous nation fighting to end unjust US rule over Cupeño lands, Garra was found guilty and executed by firing squad.