Abstract: This project revalues the often underrated concept of ambivalence as a distinct concept pregnant with creative potentialities and applies it to settler Newfoundland culture as a research lens. In the process, our understanding and image of the place are enriched by reinterpreting a collection of charged contexts, which have hitherto been considered little related, as belonging to a pervasive and potentially creative web of cultural ambivalence. Contexts studied include the European colonization of the island, the precariousness in Newfoundland outports, the Smallwood era’s sociopolitical tangle, clashes between resource exploitation and love of the land, settler Newfoundlanders’ non-singular colonial identity, and the place’s puzzling quality as both centre and periphery. In terms of research questions, the project asks what a meaningful and productive understanding of ambivalence looks like and how it can be used to develop a richer understanding of settler Newfoundland.1 Methodologically, the research is based on discourse analysis with a focus on problematization, abductive reasoning, transversality, and speculation. These approaches share the capacity to open alternative trajectories of reasoning through the radical questioning or active ignoring of existing explanatory systems. This tenor is imperative for a project that attempts to reshuffle both the conceptual and interpretive packs by using an undervalued concept (ambivalence) to re-map a jagged terrain (an array of tensions in settler Newfoundland). Conceptual key findings include the unambiguity of ambivalence and its overlap with creativity. Within the Newfoundland case study, the lens of cultural ambivalence challenges supposedly demarcated spheres of agency and power in both colonial and postcolonial spheres and exposes Newfoundlanders’ enhanced capacity for creativity. Moreover, it allows me to debunk a number of persistent myths and to provide others with actual content. Finally, by assembling a variety of contexts not studied in this constellation before under the umbrella of cultural ambivalence, I am able to identify correlations that have previously gone unnoticed or underappreciated. The resulting web of ambivalence provides a rhizomatic explanatory grid that establishes a creative facet of the place and exposes new leverage points for addressing cultural tensions. This recommends cultural ambivalence as a potent prism for borderlands with complex colonial histories more generally. 1Please note that, with the local settler society and culture as my object of study, my focus is on the island part of the province of Newfoundland and Labrador, where the large majority of the settler population resides.








Abstract: “Nurturing Resistance: Food Sovereignty in Jonny Appleseed and The Seed Keeper” investigates how Indigenous literary characters engage in subsistence practices—growing, preparing, and consuming food—as a means of resisting the resource extraction, industrial agriculture, and ecological degradation perpetrated by settler-colonial powers on traditional First Nations and Métis territories in present-day Manitoba and Minnesota. This master’s thesis reads works of fiction by authors Diane Wilson (Dakhóta) and Joshua Whitehead (Two-Spirit Oji-nêhiyaw member of Peguis First Nation) as “case studies” that contribute to a better understanding of the real-life struggles Indigenous people face to reclaim their ancestral lands and lifeways. North American settler society’s aggressive consumption of land, resources, and even Indigenous bodies looms large in both novels. In Wilson’s and Whitehead’s texts, Indigenous characters undermine these exploitative Euro-American power structures and challenge cultural hegemony by exerting bodily autonomy, nurturing familial relationships, and cultivating (traditional) foods. Multiple generations of Dakhóta women in The Seed Keeper (2021) struggle against the cultural and environmental destruction inflicted upon their traditional territory by Euro-American settlers. Ripped from her family by the predatory policies of the U.S. foster care system, Wilson’s protagonist Rosalie eventually finds her way back to her roots through the seeds and plants of her Dakhóta homeland. In Jonny Appleseed (2018) Whitehead’s protagonist similarly connects to his ancestors and sustains friendships through sharing meals. This literary analysis explores characters’ fraught relationships with highly processed foods which simultaneously bring them and their relatives closer together while also contributing to high rates of diet-related diseases within their communities. Despite the pervading food insecurity he experiences in Peguis First Nation and in Winnipeg, Jonny and his family manage to renegotiate and resurge their culture’s traditional foodways to meet their contemporary needs. In both novels the struggle for food sovereignty reaches far beyond physical survival. For Indigenous characters, cultural survival is inextricably rooted in food sovereignty.


Abstract: This dissertation investigates the reproduction of American settler colonialism in the Tohono (desert, Tohono O’odham territory) and waterways’ physical and ideological reconstruction via the appropriation of O’odham labor and indigeneity since the early twentieth century. Social scientists have emphasized the role of infrastructure, land, labor, race, and gendered and sexualized power in the physical and ideological reproduction of settler colonialism in the United States. Looking at the transformation of the Tohono following American colonialism, I ask, “How has indigeneity been appropriated to reconstruct waterways in the Tohono since Franklin D. Roosevelt’s New Deal? How has American settler colonialism established collaborative arrangements with O’odham in the form of governance and labor? How have ideas and responses to water management impacted the everyday lives of O’odham?” I focus on historical and current experiences and perceptions of drought to trace the role of power in local and national discussions of water management. This research argues four main points: 1) both water management and the racialization of Tohono O’odham labor have been intricately tied to the expansion of settler colonialism, 2) commercial agriculture has worked to shape the racial and gendered experiences of Indigenous women, 3) American scientists and media sources in Southern Arizona have historically nationalized discussions about water to garner political and economic support for conservation projects, and 4) Collaborative arrangements between Tohono O’odham elites and Anglo American elites have produced structures of stratification expressed in fiscal inequality and historically recurring experiences of environmental and political violence.