Abstract: Climate imaginaries – collectively held visions of future climate change – take shape in a variety of media and genres, from computer models to poetry. While some cli-mate imaginaries have proven particularly enduring and have managed to attain a hegemonic status in climate change discourse – for example, the “techno-market” imaginary and the “climate apocalypse” imaginary – others remain marginalized. Drawing on Waubgeshig Rice’s Moon of the Crusted Snow (2018), this article theorizes the “colonial Anthropocene” imaginary as an alternative imaginary and examines its co-production at the intersection of academic discourses, activism, and literature. The “colonial Anthropocene” imaginary generally and Moon of the Crusted Snow spe-cifically negotiate ideological tensions that have emerged in the discourse on the An-thropocene and forge a connection between the seemingly exceptional event of an-thropogenic climate change and a historical sequence of colonial violence and forced displacement of Indigenous peoples. As one of this imaginary’s manifestations in the literary domain, Moon of the Crusted Snow (2018) embeds climate change into a longer story that begins with settler colonialism on the North American continent by drawing on an equally old genre: the Indian captivity narrative. Significantly, the “co-lonial Anthropocene” imaginary is a reaction to the impulse toward claims to univer-sality resurfacing in the discourse on the Anthropocene, particularly in the notion of “the human.” 



Abstract: This dissertation traces the evolution of “emigrant colonialism” from the late nineteenth century through the interwar years. During this period, several traditionally emigrant-sending nations, including Poland, Germany, Italy, and Japan, developed similar strategies for channeling their outflows of migrants into projects for overseas expansion. What they called “emigrant colonialism” involved forming private companies to purchase large tracts of isolated territory abroad. By settling their compatriots in linguistically homogeneous company towns on the frontiers of Brazil, Argentina, and Paraguay, they sought to simulate a national settler colonial experience while expanding economic and political influence overseas. Although some aimed to use these demographic enclaves as foreign extensions of their domestic economies, others aspired to transform their settlement colonies into fully independent “daughter states” in South America. While the specifics of their respective agendas varied, German, Polish, Italian, and Japanese emigrant colonialists all developed analogous geopolitical imaginaries and approaches to managing migration. This dissertation explains how and why they developed such a simultaneously idiosyncratic yet similar expansionist strategy. By reconstructing the perspectives of German and Polish emigrant colonial activists from the 1880s through the 1930s and situating them within the secondary scholarship on Japan and Italy, this study argues that emigrant colonialism was not nationally unique to any one of these nations, as previous historians have held. Rather, emigrant colonialism was a subgenre of imperialism that all four collaboratively pioneered through their rivalry and mimesis. In addition to pinpointing the unique spin each nation gave to the practice, this dissertation highlights the cross-pollination and convergent evolution of the German, Polish, Italian, and Japanese emigrant colonial projects over the interwar years. This study advances two major claims to explain this entangled history. First, it contends that the transnational flows of influence between their expansionist projects were facilitated by a shared “underdog imperialist mentality,” defined as a specific way of viewing the world and their nations’ place within it. Second, it argues that the international system of the interwar world played a crucial role in fostering the growth and development of emigrant colonialism during this period.