Abstract: What does it mean to narrate the human condition when it is forced to confront militarization, occupation, and displacement? What does it mean to author experiences violently constrained by settler colonialism? Furthermore, what does it mean to engage in such practices using digital media? Reflecting on these questions, my dissertation explores the affirming ways Palestinians narrate their experiences using new and digital media, communicating what I refer to as a digital poetic. In my work, I illustrate how a digital poetic reveals technomediated possibilities for Palestinian sociality not foreclosed by the disembodying and death-making logics of settler colonialism, militarization, occupation, or displacement. I take as my point of departure the impossibility of narration advanced by Edward Said in his essay, “Permission to Narrate” (1984). Said highlights obstacles to narrating a Palestinian experience due to the pejorative powers of Israel and the West’s “disciplinary communication apparatus.” In attending to Said’s call for a Palestinian-authored narration, my dissertation advances a decolonial feminist reading practice illuminating an exclusively Palestinian sociality unconcerned with externalized validation and unrestricted by the disciplinary powers of the state. To undertake this work, my project first outlines a poetics of refusal, by centering Palestinian examples of life-making, life-preserving, and life-affirming practices. To illustrate this, I first engage with the writings of contemporary Arab women writers Etel Adnan, Adania Shibli, and Suheir Hammad to articulate a poetics of refusal that gives rise to a grammatology of an embodied sociality. Then, to exemplify the layered textures of a Palestinian digital poetic, I turn my attention to the 2020 Palestine Writes Literature Festival. Taking place over five days and accessible on the festival’s “Virtual Venue,” social media sites including YouTube and Instagram, Palestine Writes is a celebratory invitation into Palestinian life, culture, and futurity. Untethered by the settler-colonial state’s “disciplinary communication apparatus,” the festival’s literary, cultural, political, and experiential presentations of Palestinian life offer a new language of resistance. These digital poetics not only unearth new publics capable of examining power, but also birth new ways of existing and knowing for those who produce them and those who engage them.








Abstract: This dissertation examines the settler colonial, multispecies, and microbial politics of Atlantic salmon aquaculture in what is now British Columbia, Canada. Salmon aquaculture production systems enable 18 million Atlantic salmon to be raised in nets that are anchored to the seafloor in the coastal waters of British Columbia each year. Aquaculture is recognized as the fastest growing method of food production worldwide and is often positioned as a “blue revolution” capable of providing sustainable, affordable seafood in the midst of salmon population declines. In British Columbia, however, the raising of Atlantic salmon in critical Pacific salmon migration routes has engendered concerns about emerging industrial uses of the waterscape and the ability for farm-borne viruses to move between species. By investigating how industrial aquaculture is encountered, negotiated, and resisted on-the-ground, particularly by Indigenous communities in whose waters the practice is occurring, I instead propose that aquaculture is not a radical departure or a revolutionary break from the past, but is steeped within and dependent upon histories of colonialism, industrialization, and capitalism that have long transformed salmon and waterscapes into sites of state and economy-building. Stemming from ongoing uncertainties regarding the potential for pathogens to transfer between Atlantic and Pacific salmon, this dissertation particularly focuses on historic, scientific, and political controversies that surround salmon viruses. In the absence of state monitoring for salmon pathogens like Piscine orthoreovirus (PRV), Indigenous leaders and their allies travel to sites of aquaculture production to monitor the daily operations of farms and gather underwater video footage from within farm sites. Campaigns to enact stronger fish health protections and document the spread of viruses and pollution also become part of broader political movement aimed at reclaiming territory and restoring Indigenous forms of governance within coastal waterscapes. While pathogens come to reflect and reinforce colonial structures of dispossession, I argue that Indigenous-led efforts to track pathogens throughout salmon bodies and ecosystems are shifting power dynamics in ways that offer new possibilities for the “blue revolution.” This research brings scholarship on pathogens and industrial landscapes into conversation with enduring concerns about the material consequences of environmental injustice and colonialism. In situating aquaculture as part of an under-explored extension of settler colonial logics, structures, and governance into marine space, I suggest that the dominant framing of settler colonialism as land-based leaves large openings for understanding how colonialism and sovereignty are enacted in water-centered and maritime regions. Illuminating how industrial aquaculture and efforts to track pathogens take place within a broader politics of asserting sovereignty “at sea” reveals how historical inequalities and ongoing power dynamics become inscribed within oceans, with important implications for understanding contemporary ocean politics in the 21st century.



Abstract: Climate change puts an inequitable and heavy burden on people who are forced to adapt to unjust socioenvironmental conditions created by the legacy of ongoing climate coloniality and historical settler and imperial colonialism. However, universalizing climate adaptation discourses fail to conceptualize these historical processes by framing climate change as external to complex social and human systems. A plural reconceptualization of adaptation instead asks us to question what it means to adapt to environmental changes not just under the guise of global climate change, but as embedded in coloniality and settler colonialism in place. Critically engaging with different epistemologies of adaptation and grappling with what it means to do this work in the context of settler colonial realities asks scholars to co-produce knowledges of adaptation that embody place-based histories and human-environmental relations that are too often erased, elided, or appropriated in mainstream Eurocentric adaptation science. In this paper, we draw on an environmental oral history with the Chief of the Lenape Indian Tribe of Delaware to understand how the possibility of indigenous futurity and climate adaptation unfolds towards confronting climate coloniality and efforts to unsettle settler colonialism on stolen lands. Addressing climate coloniality on settler colonial territories suggests that as part of discussing climate change adaptation, scholars should make way for repatriating indigenous knowledges of adaptation and climate change to repair colonial wounds.