Abstract: This dissertation describes how the specific settler-colonial histories of the United States and Argentina led to similar types of counter-colonial science fiction taking shape in both countries. In Argentina, as opposed to parts of Latin America where ideas of racial mestizaje are more dominant, colonial discourse has exalted a “pure” whiteness that would “civilize” the frontier by murdering indigenous people outright. This idea has much in common with genocidal notions of Manifest Destiny in the United States. The dismal commonality of these two colonial discourses led, in turn, to both countries appropriating the style of European proto-science fiction — which tended to allegorize and rearrange the key terms of colonial discourse — in parallel ways. While the majority of this science fiction tended to support the settler-colonial ideology of Argentina and the U.S., there were also authors in both countries that used the genre to subvert the frontier ideology of their respective nations. The focus of my analysis is the latter, more subversive type of writing. In describing the shape this science fiction took in Argentina and the U.S., I hope to contribute to documenting the prehistory of the anticolonial and antiracist science fiction that has risen to prominence since the 1990s, as well as to highlight how certain formal features of the genre become salient in geographically specific colonial contexts.






Abstract: From 1919 through the early 1950s, agricultural scientists affiliated with the University of California and agricultural scientists setting up settlements in Mandatory Palestine traveled between California and Palestine on a series of research trips. Building on conversations in historical political ecology and critical political ecologies of settler colonialism and racial capitalism, this article sets out to answer, how was agricultural science part of the project of settler colonialism in both California and Palestine in the first half of the twentieth century? Through an analysis of archival materials–field notes, professional and personal correspondence, and scholarly and popular media publications by US and European Jewish Zionist scientists—I argue that these scientists naturalized and made universal racial hierarchies through transnational technoscientific collaboration. US and Zionist scientists engaged in exchange and debate in two topics: over the proper physical organization of and location of farms, and over the concept of carrying capacity of the land of historic Palestine. In both, agricultural science was used as an objective reason to elevate Western ideologies of proper cultivation and capitalist yield. This justified the dispossession of Palestinians from their land because they were “poor stewards.” This historical case study holds implications for contemporary issues around land and population by Zionists in Israel today, and related debates in global sustainable development at large.