Abstract: This article articulates a sociological conception of settler colonial remembering as a tool of legitimation. Theories of memory in the context of settler colonialism generally center counter-memories by the subaltern or colonized, or official hegemonizing representations at the level of state institutions. Underexamined is the dialectical nature of memory and discursive representations that help reproduce settler colonial processes of accumulation and displacement at the micro-level. The article draws on archival data from avowedly socialist-leftist Zionist colonies to explicate patterned representations of Palestinian villages that Zionist forces gradually displaced prior to and during the 1948 War/Nakba. I demonstrate how the colonial settlers attributed political meaning through five representational modes: contrasting the indigenous as backward and primitive and settlers as progressive and developed; denying an indigenous connection to the land; emphasizing amiable relations through the promotion of cultural progress and settler superiority; asymmetrically assessing settler and indigenous belongings to national collectives; and legitimizing land purchases that dispossessed indigenous cultivators, despite the settlers’ socialist ideology, while reducing conflict to the issue of economic compensation. I theorize a form of settler colonial memory based not merely on erasure, but on recognition and disavowal. Finally, I argue that local memory is a significant site of production in which the conceptual tools to both trace the historical processes of supremacy and subvert asymmetrical sociality lie.



Abstract: Eighteenth and nineteenth century British and European colonial extension into the New World and the South Seas resulted in the growth of new colonial cities. With this development came the establishment of Western institutions, namely, the museum. These new museums needed content, and where better to look than the models beloved at ‘home’ in England. The need for legitimizing ancestors for a young Empire, and already established reverence for Greco-Roman art saw British colonisers looking to the ancient past for works which represented both. Works within the canon of ancient sculptures deemed the paragon of material culture were reproduced in plaster, distributed, and displayed throughout the colonies during the Victorian period. Behind each of these donated collections can be found an individual, or a small group of men, who sought to enrich their emerging cities and enhance their personal legacy. In a single transaction, groups of casts could be sent to preserve ‘good taste’ and provide the means for education while also establishing the donor as a cultured connoisseur and a generous philanthropist. These displays of wealth were a way of building legacy, both personal and cultural, as they connected cities like Auckland, New Zealand, back to English art and values. As the circulation of casts reached its height, Auckland was given its sizeable collection by Thomas Russell. The Auckland Institute and Museum received thirty-three statues and busts in 1878, made by Domenico Brucciani, the era’s foremost castmaker in Britain. The donation was significant in size, quality, and precedence. With the Russell Statues (as this gift is known), the Auckland Institute and Museum could diversify its collection, following in the footsteps of other cities moving towards a colonial metropolitan ideal. My research tracks and examines the uses of this collection as exhibition items, educational tools for the South Kensington system, tastemakers, and decoration, unveiling the complex roles they have filled. This thesis explores their odyssey from fabrication in Brucciani’s London workshop to their resting place – principally in the Auckland Museum’s storage facilities. It also investigates the dissemination of Western artistic ideals and the European fascination with Greece and Rome.