Abstract: This dissertation explores the role of white women in the settler colonial processes of the Zuid Afrikaansche Republiek (ZAR) and the Northwest Territories in the nineteenth century. It introduces to the historiography of the Transvaal evidence that the ZAR mimicked the patterns of settler colonization globally. Through an analysis of the Boer trek period, statute law, private diaries and correspondence, and government records, this dissertation shows that white women played a fundamental role in the creation of a settler colonial republic, and its predecessor settlements, in the Transvaal region from 1834 to 1881. It is also placed in conversation with the established settler colonial history of Canada. The thesis includes a comparative case study, Wetaskiwin, Alberta, against which to affirm the internationally consistent nature of settler colonialism broadly, and in the ZAR, specifically. The dissertation studies the role of women through three thematic paradigms: settler colonialism, race, and gender. In each, the history of women as laborers, wives, reproducers of the state, and social figureheads and caregivers, comes to the fore to show that women served vital roles during settler colonization, and in state policies of Indigenous removal and displacement. The dissertation concludes that white women were core participants in settler colonization in the ZAR, and that the ZAR fit into a global pattern of imperial settlement.


Abstract: In this critical introduction, co-editors Dan Tout, Emma-Jaye Gavin, and Julia Hurst set out the provocation and framing for Barriers to Truth and Justice in Settler-Colonial Australia: Why Won’t Settlers Listen? The collection emerges in the aftermath of the defeat of the October 2023 referendum on an Indigenous Voice to Parliament and the constitutional recognition of Australia’s First Peoples as Australia’s First Peoples, situating this defeat in the broader context of persistent patterns of settler refusal to hear and act upon truths long articulated by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples. Rather than a deficit of knowledge, let alone information, the editors identify a pervasive infrastructure of refusal—denial, ignorance, and antipathy—that sustains settler legitimacy while constraining the possibilities of justice. Situating Australian experience within comparative and transnational contexts, the volume interrogates how refusal operates institutionally and affectively, and how it is reproduced through pedagogy, culture, and politics. At the same time, contributors foreground Indigenous-led truth-telling and sovereignty, affirming their independent power as practices of healing, resurgence, and mobilisation. Rejecting reconciliationist closures, the introduction advances a historiographical agonism that retains tension and contestation as necessary to resisting settler moves to innocence. In mapping both impediments and points of vulnerability, this collection reframes the burden of response: truth-telling is not a project First Nations must render more palatable to a settler polity structured by refusal, but rather a challenge settlers and their institutions must confront if just relations are to be realised.





Abstract: Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are deeply connected to the lands, seas and skies across the settler-colonial state of Australia. They take strength from ongoing connection to culture, spirituality and community. Colonisation impacts these life-giving connections through the dispossession of peoples from Country and disconnection from community and culture. These ongoing colonial processes negatively impact Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people’s access to quality housing and are the source of housing precarity. Housing research often portrays Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people’s housing experiences within deficit discourse. Deficit discourse causes harm in its problematisation of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people who are reduced to characterisations such as ‘the Indigenous housing problem’. Strengths-based discourse, now regularly applied in health, can address this harm by centring Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people’s cultures, knowledges and priorities, and appropriately contextualising experiences within settler colonialism. Aboriginal health researchers have for two decades pushed for strengths-based discourse, leading to shifts in health policy, such as the call to eradicate systemic racism. There is an opportunity to similarly flip the script in housing research to centre Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people’s existing strengths, capabilities and community-led housing solutions and positively influence housing policy.




Abstract: Major actors within the United Nations and academia have suggested that the Svalbard Global Seed Vault (SGSV), a ‘backup’ facility for the world’s crop diversity, could facilitate reconciliation between Indigenous and ex situ conservation approaches. This paper examines the collaboration between the SGSV and their Indigenous depositor, Parque de la Papa (Parque), to assess this proposition. Although the SGSV promises to ‘secure’ crop diversity ‘for the benefit of everyone’, work in decolonial and Indigenous studies has shown that neoliberal capitalist and colonial structures underpin and hinder reconciliation and conservation efforts. By critically analyzing literature from various fields and content from institutional websites, I demonstrate how the SGSV’s methods, while intended to safeguard crop diversity, may inadvertently perpetuate colonial dynamics by integrating Indigenous seeds into a system that prioritizes Western/settler colonial, neoliberal capitalist values. Reading the two conservation approaches vis-à-vis, I highlight the asymmetrical exchange that the Parque must navigate to preserve Indigenous knowledge and resources amid climate change challenges in the Andean highlands. Based on the analysis, I assert that despite the collaboration’s benefits, it risks transforming Indigenous communities along Western lines, potentially undermining biodiversity. Understanding these challenges is crucial for improving biodiversity protection and supporting the communities involved.