Abstract: Settler-colonial archives have historically functioned as instruments of state power, perpetuating narratives that erase or marginalize Indigenous peoples’ histories, knowledges, and sovereignties. This study investigated the growing phenomenon of contemporary Indigenous artistic interventions within these institutions, framing them as critical acts of “curating dissent” that challenge the archival claim to objective truth. This research employed a qualitative, comparative case study methodology to analyze three distinct, institutionallysanctioned artistic interventions in major settler-colonial archives in Canada, Australia, and New Zealand between 2020 and 2024. A multi-modal data collection strategy included visual analysis of the artworks, textual analysis of archival records, and thematic analysis of 25 semi-structured interviews with artists, curators, and community members. The analysis revealed three primary strategies of intervention: “Re-contextualization and Juxtaposition,” which disrupts colonial classifications by placing Indigenous epistemologies alongside archival records; “Embodied Knowledge and Affective Encounters,” which uses performance and sensory elements to reanimate ancestral connections within the archive; and “Digital Sovereignty and Archival Remixing,” which leverages digital tools to reclaim and re-narrate colonial documents. Institutional responses ranged from enthusiastic collaboration to forms of negotiated resistance and containment. In conclusion, within the specific context of sanctioned projects, Indigenous artistic interventions function as potent decolonial practices that create new spaces for Indigenous knowledge and memory to flourish. This study proposes the concept of “Archival Acupuncture,” a theoretical framework for understanding how these targeted, therapeutic interventions can systemically alter the narrative body of the archive to foster restorative justice. These acts signal a critical shift, demanding archives become active partners in a more just future.



Abstract: The article investigates the spatial dimension of the entanglement of settler colonialism and nationalism embedded in the Israeli policy of cultural heritage conservation in Silwan (East Jerusalem) by focusing on the case of the City of David National Park. Attempting to naturalize the Jewish presence in this part of the city, Israel invests in production of a site-specific and highly agential arrangement of material and discursive elements to solidify the Jewish nation’s identity and facilitate the colonial acquisition of the Palestinian land. This architectonics of belonging occlude the colonial character of the Israeli presence in the area, spatializing what discursively figures as a historically legitimized Jewish right to this territory, thus redesigning the spatial settler colonial dynamics defining who counts as native in the area. However, as the article expounds, from a settler colonial perspective, both the Zionist settlement project in Silwan and the establishment of the City of David National Park display a dissonance between aspirations and outcomes: while devastating for local Palestinians, these initiatives still fundamentally fail in achieving settler colonial goals. The article offers a localized reading of the Israeli project in Silwan by paying attention to the narratives of Silwanian activists, attempting to look at the ongoing situation in Silwan from their standpoint. As a result, it partly recalibrates the dominant settler colonial paradigm (typically focused on settlers’ perspective), situating our analysis within the context of Palestinian resilience.







Abstract: The Australian settler government has repeatedly promised indigenous peoples (Anangu) of Uluru-Kata Tjuta National Park that they will benefit from settler government’s use of their lands as a significant tourism destination, yet the anangu community of Uluru remains one of the poorest communities in Australia. this article utilises historical analysis and qualitative interviews with Anangu, Parks staff, and tourism staff to chart key dynamics in the relationship between the tourism industry and anangu over 39 years of Joint Management in the Park. We show how the prioritisation of settler logics of tourism and work over Anangu benefit is not just an arbitrary cultural decision meted out in day-to-day interpersonal relations but is built into the geographies and temporalities of work in the Park. highlighting how anangu benefit is deferred through settler logics of work draws attention to the possibility for alternatives that are founded on indigenous lifeworlds. this article’s analytic focus on quotidian, relational dynamics in intercultural contexts brings insights from indigenous and settler colonial studies into tourism research and demonstrates a new way of identifying opportunities for transformation in indigenous tourism industries in settler colonies. From a practical perspective, these insights underscore the importance of developing shared understandings of what meaningful and good “work” is in intercultural industries and highlights possible interventions into entrenched dynamics between indigenous and settler peoples in these contexts.