Abstract: The Russian Empire’s conquest of Southern Ukraine in the 1780s inaugurated an era characterised by the convergence of internal and external colonisation. This southward expansion granted Russia access to lucrative maritime trade routes and established a fertile agricultural frontier on Ukrainian lands. Contemporary observers likened the colonisation of the Black Sea steppes to overseas imperial projects, drawing direct comparisons between ‘New Russia’ and the American West. These parallels rested on shared features of settler colonisation, unfree labour regimes, and the export of staple commodities. As Odessa emerged as a key port city, this article situates its early development within the broader history of settler colonialism by comparing it to New Orleans and its influence over the Mississippi Basin. Between 1800 and the 1860s, both cities became major economic centres, serving as gateways for immigration and capital due to their geographical locations and inflows of foreign investment. Yet their shared reliance on bound labour also proved a structural vulnerability, hindering commercial modernisation and industrial diversification. By placing Odessa’s economic trajectory in a transatlantic framework, the study highlights how Russian settler colonialism shaped labour relations, commerce, and the integration of Southern Ukraine into global economic networks.



Abstract: This paper interrogates the complex negotiation of anthropocentrism within the literary imagination of Patrick White. While his oeuvre is celebrated for its profound engagement with the Australian landscape, this analysis argues that White simultaneously employs and subverts the settler-colonial gaze, exposing the inherent violence of an anthropocentric worldview. Through an ecocritical and postcolonial lens, this study deconstructs White’s narrative strategies in key works such as Voss and The Tree of Man. It examines how his protagonists—from the megalomaniacal explorer Voss to the pioneering Stan Parker—initially impose a hermeneutics of domination upon the land, perceiving it as a space for conquest, spiritual trial, or material utility. However, White systematically dismantles this gaze. The Australian environment is not a passive backdrop but an active, agential force that resists, transforms, and ultimately obliterates human pretensions of mastery. This paper traces the progression from a colonizing perspective to moments of ecological reckoning, where the human subject is rendered vulnerable and re-situated within, rather than above, the more-than-human world. By foregrounding the land’s formidable alterity and its capacity to erode ego and identity, White’s fiction performs a crucial critique. It reveals the spiritual and ecological poverty of anthropocentrism, suggesting that a tenuous, fraught coexistence, predicated on a recognition of human insignificance, is the only alternative to the settler’s doomed project of domination.


A settler, who thinks like a settler and responds like a settler in the face of a settler crisis: access the Substack post here.


Abstract: This article examines the failure of the Bal-Gharbieh factory in the late 1950s, an industrial venture proposed under Israeli military rule, to show how ‘economic development’ operated as a tool of elimination through dependency. It argues that understanding the Palestinian economy in Israel requires integrating two frameworks: dependency theory, rooted in Marxist critiques of development, and the logic of elimination in settler-colonial studies. Modernization in Arab villages functioned as a discourse of collaboration with select Palestinian figures and local leaders, reinforcing dependency, while simultaneously undermining their authority – as in the case of Fares Hamdan – by restructuring Palestinian economic and social life. Drawing on archival documents, government reports, and community narratives, the study shows that the factory, promoted as a step toward modernization, was designed to dispossess land, dismantle peasant structures, and control surplus labor. The factory’s rapid collapse was not the product of poor planning but of the settler-colonial state’s policies toward Palestinian citizens. Its failure, shaped by the involvement of local Zionist actors and companies seeking to exploit Arab labor, highlights how development projects intersected with elimination. This case complicates conventional narratives of Israeli development and dependency by showing how military rule extended control beyond the state and how minor Zionist actors reinforced settler-colonial structures.