Abstract: Despite global and national calls and efforts to bring Indigenous knowledge and peoples into engineering and Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) education, these populations continue to struggle in these fields because their ways of knowing are not recognized or legitimized due to settler colonialism. Consequently, Indigenous peoples view Indigenous knowledge and STEM education as two separate entities. Decolonization research is in the beginning stages to develop culturally relevant STEM education for Indigenous populations to heal their identities and bring back their knowledge and its motivations. This narrative literature review focuses on analyzing these implementations of reconnecting STEM education and Indigenous knowledge in North America using the research question: How has Indigenous knowledge of North America been (re)incorporated into culturally relevant STEM education? Using review procedures including specified database search terms and inclusion and exclusion criteria, I identified 20 articles focused around incorporating Indigenous knowledge into STEM education as a form of culturally relevant pedagogy. Using inductive coding and thematic analysis, I identified three themes: centering Indigenous ways of knowing, ensuring Elder involvement, and recognizing all knowledge holders. By comparing exemplary implementations of Indigenous knowledge into STEM education for all three themes, I illustrated the meaning and benefits of each. Finding the common thread between the three themes provides one answer for the research question. I propose spiritual knowledge as the binding thread that connects the themes and (re)connects Indigenous knowledge and STEM education. Spirituality can become a theorizing space to help with the decolonizing of engineering education by challenging the dominant knowledge types and bringing in other ways of knowing.





Abstract: This article is part of the collaborative research project Populist Publics. Housed at Carleton University (www.carleton.ca/populistpublics), it applies a data-driven analysis of online hate networks to trace how false framings of the historical past, what we call historical misinformation, circulates across platforms, shaping the politics of the center alongside the fringes. We cull large datasets from social media platforms and run them through a variety of different programs to help visualize how harmful speech and civilizational rhetoric about race, ethnicity, immigration, multiculturalism, gender equality, and LGBTQ+ rights are circulated by far-right groups across borders, noting specifically when and how they are taken up in the mainstream as legitimate discourse. Our interest is in how the distortion of the historical record is used to build alternative collective memories of the past so as to undermine minority rights and cultures in the present. We began with a basic question: To what extent is this actually new? As much as the atomized publics of our current day create ideal conditions for radical ideas to fester and circulate, it was obvious to us that we needed to look for linkages across time, drawing on interdisciplinary methods from the fields of history, media and communication, and data science to identify the tactics, strategies, and repertoires among such groups and individuals. By analyzing German-Canadian relations in particular, what follows is a first attempt to piece together some of these connections, with a focus on far-right hate groups—homegrown and imported—in the settler colonial project that is today’s Canada.