Excerpt: Survivance as a legal concept names the right to inheritance and more specifically the condition of being qualified to inherit a legacy. In his essay “Aesthetics of Survivance” (2008), Vizenor describes survivance as “the heritable right of succession or reversion of an estate” (1). This aspect of survivance is overlooked by those scholars of Vizenor’s work who focus rather on the conjunction of the terms “survival” and “resistance,” terms that are important most fundamentally as they intersect with the capacity to transmit and to accept the inheritance of the past that is itself the intersection of survival and resistance. That is to say, acts of resistance and survival form the axiology (or ethical action) of survivance; the preservation of tribal languages, for example, or the transmission of traditional stories, are acts that ensure the continual availability of the tribal values of knowing and being in the world that are encoded in those words and stories. These Indigenous lifeways constitute the inheritance that motivates survivance. Thus, survivance is not a static object or method but a dynamic, active condition of historical and cultural survival and also of political resistance, practiced in the continual readiness of Indigenous communities to accept and continue the inheritance passed on by elders and ancestors. In this sense, claims made by recent Indigenous video-game developers to speak to youth through digital media by creating games that transmit tribal legacies of language, stories, ontologies, and ways of knowing and being in the world, speak to the practice of survivance. Indeed, the particular capacity of video games to engage active participation in the making of stories offers a powerful means to encourage and sustain survivance. In what game designer Elizabeth LaPensée (Anishinaabe/Métis) refers to as “Indigenously-determined” video-games, then, survivance is both a substantive dimension of the experience of playing a game and also the underlying structural principle that governs the game mechanics that are determined by Indigenous epistemologies.




Abstract: This dissertation addresses the depictions of Native Americans in public works of art. More specifically, I am concerned with murals that were commissioned by the Section of Painting and Sculpture (the Section); a program that was administered by the United States Treasury as part of President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s New Deal Era programs (1933-1943). These paintings were installed in post offices across the country, and they were generally well received by local community members. The Section embraced the art movement of Regionalism, which led artists to paint scenes of local history, culture, and industry. Interestingly, depictions of Indigenous cultures can be found in one-quarter of the more than 1600 works of art created for the program. These images were rarely based on realistic representations, but, instead, artists often relied on stereotypes of Indigenous people. The myth of the vanishing race was commonplace as was the romanticized view of the noble savage, and some artists painted views of the Indians as savages attacking white settlers. As the longest running, government- sponsored art program, it is not possible to discuss these representations in their entirety. Instead, I will use murals painted for Oklahoma post offices as a case study for my discussion of Native themes in these New Deal era paintings. The Oklahoma post office murals include the stereotypes so frequently associated with depictions of the American Indian. However, what truly sets Oklahoma apart is that Native American artists were awarded commissions as part of this art program. Therefore, my work provides an opportunity to compare depictions of the Indigenous people of Oklahoma by both Native American and non-Native artists. To understand the reception of these paintings, I rely on the theories of E.H. Gombrich and Hans Robert Jauss as well as the writings on history and memory by Pierre Nora. By using their methodologies to frame my analysis of these paintings, I call attention to the positive reception of the depictions of Indigenous cultures based on the viewer’s own perceptions of Native American history and culture. Finally, I consider the understanding of these paintings in the twenty-first century. Some of the images painted for the Section are disrespectful to the Indigenous people they depict. Appropriation and misrepresentation are issues that must be addressed. However, censorship of art can be dangerous. In my conclusion, I argue that these representations should be properly contextualized in order to teach the public about the long-standing tropes that developed in American art through the inaccurate yet widely accepted depictions of Indigenous people of the United States.



Access the chapter here.



Excerpt: The US American West is often referred to as “the geography of hope.” Many people came to the Great Plains looking toward a better future for themselves and their children. Among these was a thirteen-year-old boy named John Talcott Norton, who moved from Mason City, Illinois, to Larned, Kansas, in 1877. Much can be learned from the insights he shared about the past. He provided a firsthand account of his journey from Illinois to Kansas and of his day-to-day experience living on the frontier. To one reading the words of this young man today, it is remarkable how many of the themes that emerge from his diary connect to contemporary life on the Plains, and, ultimately, to how topics such as social studies are best taught in schools today. Few other topics in today’s curriculum can be more important than social studies, since it draws on so many areas of inquiry, for example, anthropology, archaeology, economics, geography, history, law, philosophy, political science, psychology, religion, and sociology, and on various aspects of the humanities, mathematics, and natural sciences. This article takes the view that connecting the accounts from the writings of young people such as John Norton will significantly enhance the teaching of the story of westward settlement. Our pedagogy can be improved and our students can experience a life that is both very different from, yet remarkably similar to, their own. In other words, there really is much that can be learned from a teenager.

To encourage western settlement, the federal government passed both the Homestead Act, in 1862, and the Timber Culture Act, in 1873. The Homestead Act gave a settler 160 acres of land if he or she lived there for five years and improved the land by cultivating it. The Timber Culture Act gave a settler 160 acres of land if he or she planted trees, and for ten years maintained them.

It was the Timber Culture Act that inspired John Talcott Norton’s family to leave Illinois for Kansas in 1877. Fortunately for the sake of posterity, he was motivated to capture in his diary what he did, what he saw, and what he was thinking while growing up on the prairie in the 1870s.

John Talcott Norton provides social studies students today with unique insights that arguably cannot be replicated with any lecture or reading from the traditional American history textbook.