The Legal History Blog has called our attention to a conference to be held at UC Irvine in April. The program looks great:
April 16th
Welcome and Introduction: Catherine Fisk (Law, UC Irvine)
Session 1: Interactions – Law, Text, History
Chair Dirk Hartog (History, Princeton)
Speakers:
Steven Wilf (Law, Connecticut), “Law/Text/Past”; Norman Spaulding (Law, Stanford), “On the Interdependence of Law, History and Memory”; Kunal Parker (Law, Miami), “Common Law Thought and the Problem of History”; Marianne Constable (Rhetoric, Berkeley), “‘In the Name of the Law’: Law as Claim to Justice”; Commentator: Christopher Tomlins (Law, UC Irvine)
Session 2: Intersections – Law, History, Culture
Chair Ariela Gross (Law, USC)
Speakers:
Peter Goodrich (Law, Cardozo), “Specters of Law: Why the History of the Legal Spectacle has not been Written”; Shai Lavi (Law, Tel Aviv), “Law as World: Secular History and Jewish Ritual in Nineteenth Century Germany”; Assaf Likhovski (Law, UCLA and Tel Aviv), “Chasing Ghosts: On Writing Cultural History of Tax Law”; Roger Berkowitz (Political Studies & Human Rights, Bard College), “History and the Noble Art of Lying”; Commentator: John Comaroff (Anthropology, Chicago)
April 17th
Session 3: Interpretations – Law, Polity, Economy
Chair: Risa Goluboff (Law, Virginia)
Speakers:
Ritu Birla (History, Toronto), “Law as Economy: Convention, Corporation, Currency”; Roy Kreitner (Radcliffe Institute and Law, Tel Aviv), “Money in the 1890s: The Circulation of Law, Politics, and Economics”; Christopher Schmidt (Law, Chicago-Kent), “Conceptions of Law in the Civil Rights Movement”; Barbara Welke (History & Law, Minnesota), “Owning Hazard in the Modern American Consumer Marketplace”; Commentator: Morton Horwitz (Law, Harvard)
Session 4: Instantiations – Law, Sovereignty, Justice
Chair Laura Kalman (History, Santa Barbara)
Speakers:
Laura Edwards (History, Duke), “The Peace: The Meaning and Production of Law in the Post-Revolutionary U.S.”; John Witt (Law, Yale), “Escape and Engagement: The Laws of War in the Early American Republic”; Paul Frymer (Politics, Princeton), “Building an American Empire: Territorial Expansion and Indian Removal, 1787-1850”; Mariana Valverde (Criminology Centre, Toronto) “‘The honour of the Crown is at stake’: Aboriginal Land Claims Litigation in Canada and the Epistemology of Sovereignty”; Commentator: Robert W. Gordon (Law, Yale)
Filed under: Call for papers, Seminar | Closed
This is now a year old, but I thought I’d put a link up to it anyway.
Settler Colonialism
Volume 107, Number 4, Fall 2008
- Ilan Pappé
- Zionism as Colonialism: A Comparative View of Diluted Colonialism in Asia and Africa
South Atlantic Quarterly 107(4): 611-633 (2008); DOI:10.1215/00382876-2008-009
- J. Kehaulani Kauanui
- Colonialism in Equality: Hawaiian Sovereignty and the Question of U.S. Civil Rights
South Atlantic Quarterly 107(4): 635-650 (2008); DOI:10.1215/00382876-2008-010
- Hilton Obenzinger
- Naturalizing Cultural Pluralism, Americanizing Zionism: The Settler Colonial Basis to Early-Twentieth-Century Progressive Thought
South Atlantic Quarterly 107(4): 651-669 (2008); DOI:10.1215/00382876-2008-011
- Alex Lubin
- “We are all Israelis”: The Politics of Colonial Comparisons
South Atlantic Quarterly 107(4): 671-690 (2008); DOI:10.1215/00382876-2008-012
- Zine Magubane
- The American Construction of the Poor White Problem in South Africa
South Atlantic Quarterly 107(4): 691-713 (2008); DOI:10.1215/00382876-2008-013
- Matthew Abraham
- The Perils of Separation: Fouzi El-Asmar’s To Be an Arab in Israel as an Allegory of Settler Colonial Anxiety
South Atlantic Quarterly 107(4): 715-734 (2008); DOI:10.1215/00382876-2008-014
- Fouad Makki
- Imperial Fantasies, Colonial Realities: Contesting Power and Culture in Italian Eritrea
South Atlantic Quarterly 107(4): 735-754 (2008); DOI:10.1215/00382876-2008-015
- Ricardo D. Salvatore
- The Unsettling Location of a Settler Nation: Argentina, from Settler Economy to Failed Developing Nation
South Atlantic Quarterly 107(4): 755-789 (2008); DOI:10.1215/00382876-2008-016
- Grant Farred
- The Unsettler
South Atlantic Quarterly 107(4): 791-808 (2008); DOI:10.1215/00382876-2008-017
- María Josefina Saldaña-Portillo
- “How many Mexicans [is] a horse worth?” The League of United Latin American Citizens, Desegregation Cases, and Chicano Historiography
South Atlantic Quarterly 107(4): 809-831 (2008); DOI:10.1215/00382876-2008-018
- Alyosha Goldstein
- Where the Nation Takes Place: Proprietary Regimes, Antistatism, and U.S. Settler Colonialism
South Atlantic Quarterly 107(4): 833-861 (2008); DOI:10.1215/00382876-2008-019
Filed under: Uncategorized | Closed
A postgraduate workshop and round table discussion is in the pipeline for early May at Sydney’s Unviersity of Technology. More details to come soon.
Filed under: Uncategorized | Closed
Seminar topics this year include:
- Sexuality in the South Seas
- Critical Histories of Human Biology and ‘Hybridity’ in the Pacific
- The Antarctic Laboratory: Science, Culture, and Law
- The Atlantic World in a Pacific Field
for more details, check the USYD School of Philosophical and Historical Inquiry website.
Filed under: Scholarship and insights, Seminar | Closed
Laura J. Mitchell has published a brilliant monograph on the VOC, settlers, and natives in early Southern Africa. The book analyses contact, law and order, settler life, Khoisan resistance and Company authority all in one neat package – and is arranged beautifully.
Congratulations to Dr. Mitchell for her fantastic monograph, and for her decision to publish it as a stunning e-book on Gutenberg, free for all readers to enjoy.
Filed under: Empire, gender, Scholarship and insights, Southern Africa | Closed
@ the University of Texas. From their website (and see also their forthcoming conference on decolonisation and Mexican independence):
February 25-26, 2010
The focus of the conference is the British Empire during its “decade of crisis” between the end of the Seven Years’ War in 1763 and the passage of the Tea Act ten years later. Over the course of this decade, Britons drastically transformed the way they viewed themselves and their empire. For the first time, British imperial policy extended to the governance of the French Catholic inhabitants of Canada, the Native people of the trans-Appalachian interior of North America, Africans in the new colony of Senegambia, and the twenty million inhabitants of Bengal subject to the authority of the East India Company. In Britain itself, the governance of this vastly extended empire engendered an enormous amount of bitter debate and anxious discussion in the halls of power as well as in the popular press. Among historians of each of the different parts of the British World, this decade has long been seen as one of crucial importance. However, while invaluable work has been done to examine British and indigenous relations and exchanges in specific colonial contexts, as well as to examine connections between the metropolis and specific colonial regions, there has been as yet few attempts to interrogate the links across and between the colonial regions and to set developments in particular regions into the context of the transformation of the British Empire as a whole. We aim to address this need by bringing scholars working on various aspects of the British World into dialogue and debate over the causes and character of the imperial transformation of the 1760s and early 1770s.
The conference will be organized around the discussion of pre-circulated papers. Accepted papers must be submitted for circulation to participants no later than February 1, 2010.
Filed under: Call for papers, Canada, United States | Closed
I was made aware of the following book by a post at the Legal History blog. According to Susan Reynolds in her new book, the legal technique of acquiring land from certain individuals for the common good, from the Medieval period to around 1800, is one that is fruitfully compared across Europe and settler North America.
In this concise history of expropriation of land for the common good in Europe and North America from medieval times to 1800, Susan Reynolds contextualizes the history of an important legal doctrine regarding the relationship between government and the institution of private property.
Before Eminent Domain concentrates on western Europe and the English colonies in America. As Reynolds argues, expropriation was a common legal practice in many societies in which individuals had rights to land. It was generally accepted that land could be taken from them, with compensation, when the community, however defined, needed it. She cites examples of the practice since the early Middle Ages in England, France, Germany, Italy, and Spain, and from the seventeenth century in America.
Reynolds concludes with a discussion of past and present ideas and assumptions about community, individual rights, and individual property that underlie the practice of expropriation but have been largely ignored by historians of both political and legal thought.
Filed under: Scholarship and insights | Closed
As part of the Macquarie Bicentenary Commemorations, the Forbes Society are presenting Brent Salter to speak on colonial law at the Common Room, NSW Bar Association, 174 Phillip Street Sydney, at 5pm on Monday 10 March. Salter, a wealth of knowledge on colonial law and co-editor of the Kercher Reports, will undoubtedly provide an interesting address regarding the rule of law in NSW during the convict era.
See here for more details.
Filed under: Australia, public lecture | Closed
Following on from the Fifth Galway Conference on Colonialism (dedicated to settler colonialism), this conference is concerned with education. From their website:
Continuing in the tradition of Colonialism Conferences at NUI Galway, we are delighted to announce that the sixth conference in the series – Education and Empire – will take place in Galway from 24th to 26th June 2010.
The aim of this interdisciplinary conference is to explore the role of education in shaping, promoting, and challenging imperial and colonial ideologies, institutions and processes throughout the modern world. We invite papers from every discipline and suggested topics may be found in the Call for Papers.
Since this conference is being in part funded through a grant provided by the Irish Research Council for the Humanities and Social Sciences to an inter-university group to explore the relationship between empire and higher education in Ireland, a strand of the conference will explore the particularity of Irish institutions of higher education in shaping the above processes, and of the role of higher education in shaping Ireland’s ambiguous coloniality.
Filed under: Call for papers, Empire | Closed
This conference looks set to take place at Maynooth, County Kildare, in August. From their website:
Short Abstract
This panel will explore cross-cultural experiences of crisis in the course of colonial encounters. We invite papers that focus on the colonized, and/or on the colonizers and their practices and concepts. Colonial is understood broadly, including both imperial and internal colonialism
Long Abstract
Colonial encounters have often been marked by moments of crisis. This might for example refer to the nefarious consequences of colonial regimes upon the indigenous cultures, or to the varied modes of autochthonous resistance that followed colonial domination. Yet, ‘crisis’ also appears in relation to the internal condition of many colonial regimes. Colonizers very often had to deal with shortage of capital and personnel; insufficient knowledge production about the ‘Other’; slippages into immorality and ‘savagery’; or, still, with metropolitan expectations hard to accomplish in the periphery. This panel seeks to explore from the perspective of historical anthropology the varied indigenous and colonial experiences of, and strategies for dealing with, crises resulting from colonial encounters. ‘Colonial crisis’ will be approached not simply as a negative and destructive notion, but also as a cross-cultural juncture for the reconfiguration of social relationships. As such, we invite papers that explore the cross-cultural significance of colonial events of crisis, engaging with empirical material. How, and why, are certain colonial encounters and events experienced and represented as ‘crisis’, for example in archives? Which specific processes are triggered by these experiences and representations, and how does this reconfigure the social, cultural, and political forms mediating between colonizers and colonized? What strategies are used to deal with colonial crisis, within both the colonizing and indigenous communities? Can processes of crisis be understood as productive moments of the reinvention of the social, rather than mere negative aspects of colonialism? ‘Colonial’ will here be taken broadly, including both imperial expansionism and internal colonialism and state-building in Europe, Asia, Africa, Oceania, or America. Areas of inquiry might refer to (but are not limited to) topics such as state-minorities relations, regimes of colonial administration, medicine, archives, governmentality, ritual and religion, commerce, or conquest.
Filed under: Call for papers, Empire | Closed